Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT results using evolutionary polynomial regression

Computers and Geotechnics

Volumn 37, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 82-92

  Rezania, Mohammad ^a   Javadi, Akbar A ^a   Giustolisi, Orazio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Earthquake; Evolutionary computation; Geotechnical models; Soil liquefaction

Indexed keywords

CASE HISTORY; COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; CONTRIBUTING FACTOR; CONVENTIONAL MODELS; EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATIONS; GEOTECHNICAL MODELS; GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETERS; LIQUEFACTION POTENTIALS; NEW APPROACHES; POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION; SANDY SOILS; THREE MODELS;

CHARGE TRAPPING; EARTHQUAKES; ELECTRON RESONANCE; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NEURAL NETWORKS; PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUANTUM THEORY; SOIL LIQUEFACTION; SOIL MECHANICS; SOILS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTY; LIQUEFACTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SANDY SOIL;

EID: 70649105547     PISSN: 0266352X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Youd T.L., Idriss I.M., Andrus R.D., Arango I., Castro G., Christian J.T., et al. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 127 10 (2001) 817-833
2. Seed H.B., and Idriss I.M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div, ASCE 97 9 (1971) 1249-1273
3. Seed HB, De Alba P. Use of SPT and CPT tests for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of sands. In: Proceedings, special conference on use of in situ testing in geotechnical engineering. Geotechnical special publication no. 6. New York: ASCE; 1986. p. 281-302.
4. Robertson P.K., and Campanella R.G. Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 111 3 (1985) 384-403
5. Seed H.B., Tokimatsu K., Harder L.F., and Chung R.M. The influence of SPT procedures on soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng Div, ASCE 11 12 (1985) 1425-1445
6. Ishihara K. Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol. 1. The Netherlands, Rotterdam: Balkema; 1985. p. 321-76.
7. Shibata T., and Teparaska W. Evaluation of liquefaction potentials of soils using cone penetration tests. Soils Found 28 2 (1988) 49-60
8. Stark T.D., and Olson S.M. Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 121 12 (1995) 856-869
9. Seed H.B., Idriss I.M., and Arango I. Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng Div, ASCE 109 3 (1983) 458-482
10. Liao S.S.C., Veneziano D., and Whitman R.V. Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 114 4 (1988) 389-411
11. Goh A.T.C. Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 120 9 (1994) 1467-1481
12. Goh, and ATC. Neural network modeling of CPT seismic liquefaction data. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 122 1 (1996) 70-73
13. Najjar Y, Ali H. SPT-based liquefaction potential assessment: an artificial neural network approach. In: Proceedings of the 12th-ASCE specialty conference on engineering mechanics. La Jolla, CA; 1998. p. 953-60.
14. Ural DN, Saka H. Liquefaction assessment by neural networks. Electron J Geotech Eng; 1998. .
15. Juang C.H., and Chen C.J. CPT-based liquefaction evaluation using artificial neural networks. Comput-Aid Civ Infrastruct Eng 14 (1999) 221-229
16. Hanna A.M., Ural D.N., and Saygili G. Evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil deposits using artificial neural networks. J Eng Comput 24 1 (2007) 5-16
17. Youd T.L., and Bennett M.J. Liquefaction sites Imperial Valley, California. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 109 3 (1983) 440-457
18. Arulanandan K, Yogachandran C, Meegoda NJ, Ying L, Zhauji S. Comparison of the SPT, CPT, SV and electrical methods of evaluating earthquake induced liquefaction susceptibility in Ying Kou City during the Haicheng earthquake. In: Proceedings of the use of in situ tests in geotechnical engineering, no. 6, New York, NY: ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication; 1986. p. 389-415.
19. Bennett M.J. Liquefaction analysis of the 1971 ground failure at the San Fernando Valley Juvenile Hall California. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 26 2 (1989) 209-226
20. Bennett MJ. Ground deformation and liquefaction of soil in the Marina district. Effects of the Loma Prieta earthquake on the Marina district, San Francisco, California; Open file rep. 90-253. Denver, Colo: Dept of the Interior, US Geological Survey; 1990. p. 44-79.
21. Tuttle M., Law K.T., Seeber L., and Jacob K. Liquefaction and ground failure induced by the 1988 Saguenay, Quebec, Earthquake. Can Geotech J 27 5 (1990) 580-589
22. Kayan RE, Mitchell JK, Seed RB, Lodge A. Nishio S, Coutinho R. Evaluation of SPT-, CPT-, and shear wave-based methods for liquefaction potential assessments using Loma Prieta data. In: Proceedings of the 4th Japan-US workshop on earthquake resistant des of lifeline facilities and countermeasures for soil liquefaction; NCEER-92-0019. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering; 1992. p. 177-92.
23. Charlie WA, Doehring DO, Brislawn JP, Scott CE, Butler LW. Liquefaction evaluation with the CSU piezo-vane. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol. 1; 1994. p. 197-200.
24. Mitchell JK, Lodge AL, Coutinho RQ, Kayen RE, Seed RB. In situ test results from four Loma Prieta earthquake liquefaction sites: SPT, CPT, DMT and shear wave velocity. Geotechnical engineering report no. UCB/GT/94-01. Earthquake Research Center, University of California, Berkeley; 1994.
25. Giustolisi O., and Savic D.A. A symbolic data-driven technique based on evolutionary polynomial regression. J Hydroinform 8 3 (2006) 207-222
26. Giustolisi O., Doglioni A., Savic D.A., and Webb B.W. A multi-model approach to analysis of environmental phenomena. Environ Model Softw 22 5 (2007) 674-682
27. Rezania M., Javadi A.A., and Giustolisi O. An evolutionary-based data mining technique for assessment of civil engineering systems. J Eng Comput 25 6 (2008) 500-517
28. Robertson P.K., and Wride C.E. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35 3 (1998) 442-459
29. Rahman M.S., and Wang J. Fuzzy neural network models for liquefaction prediction. J Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22 (2002) 685-694
30. Juang C.H., Yuan H., Lee D.H., and Lin P.S. Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 129 1 (2003) 66-80
31. Javadi A.A., Rezania M., and Mousavi Nezhad M. Evaluation of liquefaction induced lateral displacements using genetic programming. J Comput Geotech 33 4-5 (2006) 222-233
32. Rezania M., and Javadi A.A. A new genetic programming model for predicting settlement of shallow foundations. Can Geotech J 44 12 (2007) 1462-1473
33. Moss R. CPT-based probabilistic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction initiation. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA; 2003.
34. Idriss I.M., and Boulanger R.W. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 26 2-4 (2006) 115-130