Telephone based self-management support by 'lay health workers' and 'peer support workers' to prevent and manage vascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Small, Nicola ^a   Blickem, Christian ^a   Blakeman, Tom ^a   Panagioti, Maria ^a   Chew Graham, Carolyn A ^b   Bower, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chronic care; Chronic kidney disease; Health services research; Lay; Management; Meta analysis; Non healthcare professional; Patients; Peer; Prevention; Randomised controlled trial; Review; Self management support; Social disadvantage; Telephone; Vascular disease

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY CARE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PEER GROUP; REVIEW; SELF CARE; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR DISEASE;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PEER GROUP; SELF CARE; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 84891033806     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-533     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Murray C, Lopez A, The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from disease, injuries and risk factors in 1990 Cambridge: The Harvard School of Public Health: World Health Organization: Harvard University Press 1996
2. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Prevention of cardiovascular disease at population level London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2010
3. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Wagner E, Austin B, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A, Health Aff 2001 20 64 78 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 (Pubitemid 33707442)
4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Chronic kidney disease. Early identification and management of chronic kidney disease in adults in primary and secondary care London: Clinical guidelines CG 73 2008
5. Designing and implementing behaviour change interventions to improve population health. Michie S, J Health Serv Res Policy 2008 13 64 69 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008014 18806194
6. The contributions of health care science to social support. Stewart M, Tilden V, Int J Nurs Stud 1995 32 535 544 10.1016/0020-7489(95)00014-9 8926155
7. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, Richardson G, et al. J Epidem Comm Health 2007 61 254 261 10.1136/jech.2006.053538 (Pubitemid 46579562)
8. Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Lewin S, Dick J, Pond P, Zwarenstein M, Aja G, van Wyk B, Coch Data Syst Rev 2005 25 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004015.pub2
9. Telephone peer-delivered intervention for diabetes motivation and support: the telecare exploratory RCT. Dale J, Caramlau I, Sturt J, Friede T, Walker R, Pat Ed Couns 2009 75 91 98 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.014
10. Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery. Dale J, Caramlau I, Docherty A, Sturt J, Hearnshaw H, Trials 2007 8 1 8 10.1186/1745-6215-8-1 17210080 (Pubitemid 46210298)
11. Adherence to diabetes control recommendations: impact of nurse telephone calls. Kim H, Oh J, J Adv Nurs 2003 44 256 261 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02800.x 14641395 (Pubitemid 37414374)
12. A telephone-delivered intervention for patients with NIDDM. Effect on coronary risk factors. Kirkman M, Weinberger M, Landsman P, Samsa G, Shortliffe E, Simel D, Feussner J, Diab Care 1994 17 840 846 10.2337/diacare.17.8.840 (Pubitemid 24235504)
13. Peer support telephone calls for improving health. Dale J, Caramlau I, Lindenmeyer A, Williams S, Coch Data Syst Rev 2009 8 doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD006903.pub2
14. Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure. Inglis S, Clark R, McAlister F, Ball J, Lewinter C, Cullington D, et al. Coch Data Syst Rev 2010 4 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007228. pub2
15. Peer support within a healthcare context: a concept analysis. Dennis C, Int J Nurs Stud 2003 40 321 332 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00092-5 12605954 (Pubitemid 36871573)
16. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of the BRinging Information and Guided Help Together (BRIGHT) intervention for the self-management support of people with stage 3 chronic kidney disease in primary care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Blickem C, Blakeman T, Kennedy A, Bower P, Reeves D, Gardner C, et al. Trials 2013 14 1 11 10.1186/1745-6215-14-1 23286245
17. Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular risk: epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention. Gansevoort R, Correa-Rotter R, Hemmelgarn B, Jafar T, Heerspink H, Mann J, et al. Lancet 2013 382 339 352 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60595-4 23727170
18. de Lusigan S, Gallagher H, Stevens P, Harris K, Dimitrieva O, Tahir A, et al. Chronic Kidney Disease Frequently Asked Questions London: NHS Employers and the General Practitioners Committee of the British Medical Association 2011
19. Medical Research Council, Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance London: MRC 2008
20. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K, JAMA 2002 288 1909 1914 10.1001/jama.288.15.1909 12377092 (Pubitemid 35168149)
21. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research Effectiveness: CRD's Guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 2001
22. Higgins J, Green S, Cochrane Hanbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Chichester, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration. John Wiley & Sons Ltd Cochrane Book Series. 2008
23. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies. Royle P, Waugh N, Med Res Method 2005 5 1 7 10.1186/1471-2288-5-1 (Pubitemid 40317978)
24. What do peer support workers do? A job description. Jacobson N, Trojanowski L, Dewa C, HSR 2012 12 1 11
25. Department of Health, Self Care: A National View in 2007 Compared to 2004-05 London: The Stationery Office 2007
26. Lipsey M, Wilson D, Practical Meta-Analysis Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications 2001
27. A randomised trial of peer coach and office staff support to reduce coronary heart disease risk in African-Americans with uncontrolled hypertension. Turner B, Hollenbeak C, Liang Y, Pandit K, Joseph S, Weiner M, J Gen Intern Med 2012 27 1258 1264 10.1007/s11606-012-2095-4 22570108
28. Results of a successful telephonic intervention to improve diabetes control in urban adults. Walker E, Blanco E, Shmukler C, Scollan-Koliopoulus M, Ullman R, Cohen H, Diab Care 2011 34 2 7 10.2337/dc10-1005
29. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette J, Annals Int Med 2010 153 507 515 10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007
30. A randomized trial of a church-based diabetes self-management program for African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Samuel-Hodge C, Keyserling TC, Park S, Johnston L, Bangdiwala S, Diab Edu 2009 35 439 454 10.1177/0145721709333270
31. Cardiac Home Education and Support Trial (CHEST): a pilot study. Parry MW-WJ, Hodnett E, Tranmer J, Dennis C, Brooks D, Canadian J Cardiol 2009 25 393 e398 10.1016/S0828-282X(09)70531-8
32. Translating a community-based motivational support program to increase physical activity among older adults with diabetes at community clinics: a pilot study of Physical Activity for a Lifetime of Success (PALS). Batik O, Phelan E, Walwick J, Wang G, LoGerfo J, Prev Chron Disease 2008 5 1 7
33. The effects of a collaborative peer advisor/advanced practice nurse intervention: cardiac rehabilitation participation and rehospitalization in older adults after a cardiac event. Carroll D, Rankin S, Cooper B, J Cardio Nurs 2007 22 313 319 10.1097/01.JCN.0000278955.44759.73
34. Pro-active call center treatment support (PACCTS) to improve glucose control in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Young RTJ, Friede T, Hollis S, Mason J, Lee P, Burns E, et al. Diab Care 2005 28 278 282 10.2337/diacare.28.2.278 (Pubitemid 40170926)
35. A randomized trial of an intervention to improve self-care behaviors of African-American women with type 2 diabetes: impact on physical activity. Keyserling T, Samuel-Hodge C, Ammerman A, Ainsworth B, Henriquez-Roldan C, Elasy T, et al. Diab Care 2002 25 1576 1583 10.2337/diacare.25.9.1576 (Pubitemid 41071114)
36. A review of volunteer-based peer support interventions in diabetes. Tang T, Guadalupe X, Cherrington A, Rana G, Diab Spect 2011 24 85 98 10.2337/diaspect.24.2.85
37. Overview of peer support models to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes. Heisler M, Diab Spect 2007 20 214 223 10.2337/diaspect.20.4. 214 (Pubitemid 350206596)
38. Different models to mobilize peer support to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations, and needs for future research. Heisler M, Fam Pract 2010 27 23 i32 10.1093/fampra/cmp003 19293400
39. The role of peer support in diabetes care and self-management. Brownson C, Heisler M, Patient 2009 2 5 17 10.2165/01312067-200902010-00002 22273055
40. Effectiveness of community health workers in the care of persons with diabetes. Norris S, Chowdhury F, Van Le K, Horsley T, Brownstein J, Zhang X, et al. Diab Med 2006 23 544 556 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01845.x
41. Impact of peer nutrition education on dietary behaviours and health outcomes among Latinos: a systematic literature review. Perez-Escamilla R, Hromi-Fiedler A, Vega-Lopez S, Bermudez-Millan A, Segura-Perez S, J Nutr Edu Behav 2008 40 208 225 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.03.011 (Pubitemid 351815196)
42. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2013. American Diabetes Association, Diab Care 2013 36 11 S66
43. KDQOI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for diabetes and chronic kidney disease. National Kidney Foundation, American J Kidney Disease 2007 49 1 S180
44. Understanding the management of early-stage chronic kidney disease in primary care: a qualitative study. Blakeman T, Protheroe J, Chew-Graham C, Rogers A, Kennedy A, BJGP 2012 62 233 e242 22520910
45. CG169 Acute kidney injury: full guideline. NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, http://guidance.nice.org.uk//CG169/Guidance [Accessed on 27 Aug 2013]
46. Feehally J, Gilmore I, Barasi S, Bosomworth M, Christie B, Davies A, et al. RCPE UK Consensus statement on management of acute kidney injury: the role of fluids, e-alerts and biomarkers Edinburgh: Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 2012
47. Epidemiology of mutlimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Barnett K, Mercer S, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B, Lancet 2012 380 37 43 10.1016/S0140- 6736(12)60240-2 22579043