Pro-Active Call Center Treatment Support (PACCTS) to improve glucose control in type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

Diabetes Care

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 278-282

  Young, Robert J ^a   Taylor, Jean ^a   Friede, Tim ^b   Hollis, Sally ^b   Mason, James M ^c   Lee, Pauline ^a   Burns, Edna ^a   Long, Andrew F ^d   Gambling, Tina ^e   New, John P ^a   Gibson, J Martin ^a  

^a HOPE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; CAUCASIAN; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NONMEDICAL OCCUPATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRO ACTIVE CALL CENTER TREATMENT SUPPORT; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING; SUPPORT GROUP; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; URBAN AREA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY CARE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOFTWARE; TELEPHONE;

EID: 19944432676     PISSN: 01495992     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.2.278     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (UKPDS 33): Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 352:837-853, 1998
2. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Cost-effectiveness analysis of improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 40. BMJ 317:720-763, 1998
3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39. BMJ 317:713-720, 1998
4. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 317:703-713, 1998
5. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ, Wagner EH, Van JTE, Assendelft WJJ: Interventions to improve ihe management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 24:1821-1833, 2001
6. Edwards R, Burns JA, McElduff P, Young RJ, New JP: Variations in process and outcomes of diabetes care by socio-economic status in Salford, UK. Diabetologia 46: 750-759, 2003
7. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM: Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care 25:1159-1171, 2002
8. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K: Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 288:2469-2475, 2002
9. Haynes RB, McDonald H, Garg AX, Montague P: Helping patients follow prescribed treatment: clinical applications. JAMA 288:2880-2883, 2002
10. McDonald HP, Garg AX, Haynes RB: Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review. JAMA 288:2868-2879, 2002
11. Klonoff DC: Diabetes and telemedicine: is the technology sound, effective, cost-effective, and practical? (Editorial). Diabetes Care 26:1626-1628, 2003
12. Long AF, Gambling T, Young RJ, Taylor J, Mason JM, the PACCTS Team: Acceptability and satisfaction with a telecarer approach to the management of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 28:283-289, 2004
13. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 321:694-696, 2000
14. Biermann E, Dietrich W, Rihl J, Standl E: Are there time and cost savings by using telemanagement for patients on intensified insulin therapy? A randomised, controlled trial. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 69:137-146, 2002
15. Gomez EJ, Hernando ME, Garcia A, Del Pozo F, Cermeno J, Corcoy R, Brugues E, De Leiva A: Telemedicine as a tool for intensive management of diabetes: the DIABTel experience. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 69:163-177, 2002
16. Hersh WR, Helfand M, Wallace J, Kraemer D, Patterson P, Shapiro S, Greenlick M: Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decision Making 1:5, 2001
17. Howells L, Wilson AC, Skinner TC, Newton R, Morris A, Greene SA: A randomised control trial of the effect of negotiated telephone stipport on glycaemic control in young people with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 19:643-648, 2002
18. Izquierdo RE, Knudson PE, Meyer S, Kearns J, Ploutz-Snyder R, Weinstock RS: A comparison of diabetes education administered through telemedicine versus in person. Diabetes Care 26:1002-1007, 2003
19. Piette JD, Weinberger V, McPhee SJ: The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care: a randomized, controlled trial. Med Care 38:218-230, 2000