Economic valuation of environmental impacts in the severely disadvantaged areas in England

Choice Experiments Informing Environmental Policy: A European Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 82-105

  Johns, Helen ^a   Hanley, Nick ^b   Colombo, Sergio ^c   Özdemiroǧlu, Ece ^a  

^a Economics for the Environment Consulting (eftec) Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^c IFAPA CENTRO EL TORUÑO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891014346     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781848441255.00011     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. Bullock, C.H. and Kay, J. (1997), 'Preservation and Change in the Upland Landscape: The Public Benefits of Grazing Management', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40(3): 315-334.
2. Cumulus Consultants Ltd, Institute for European Environmental Policy and the Countryside, and Countryside Research Unit (2005), Assessment of the Impact of CAP Reform and Other Key Policies on Upland Farms and Land Use Implications in both Severely Disadvantaged and Disadvantaged Areas of England, report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
3. Hanemann,W.M. (1984), 'Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiment with Discrete Responses', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66: 332-341.
4. Hanley, N., MacMillan, D., Wright, R.E., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parsisson, D. and Crabtree, B. (1998), 'Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(1): 1-15.
5. Hausman, J.A. and McFadden, D. (1984), 'Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model', Econometrica, 55, 1219-1240.
6. Krinsky, I. and Robb, A.L. (1986), 'On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities', Review of Economics and Statistics, 68: 715-719.
7. Louviere, J.J., Hensher,D.A. and Swait, J.D. (2000), Stated Choice Models: Analysis and Application, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Louviere, J.J., Street, D., Carson, R., Ainslie, A., Deshazo, J., Cameron, T., Hensher, D., Kohn, R. and Marley, T. (2002), 'Dissecting the Random Component of Utility', Marketing Letters 13(3): 177-193.
9. Street, D., Burgess, L. and Louviere, J. (2005), 'Quick and Easy Choice Sets: Constructing Optimal and Nearly Optimal Stated Choice Experiments', International Journal of Research in Marketing 22(4): 459-470.
10. Swait, J. (2006), 'Advanced choice models', in Kanninen, B. (ed.), Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice, Boston: Kluwer.
11. White, P.C.L. and Lovett, J.C. (1999), 'Public Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Nature Conservation in the North York Moors National Park, UK', Journal of Environmental Management, 55: 1-13.
12. Willis, K.G. and Garrod, G.D. (1993), 'Valuing Landscapes: A Contingent Valuation Approach', Journal of Environmental Management, 37(1): 1-22.