Antitrust analysis of tying arrangements and exclusive dealing

Antitrust Law and Economics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 183-212

  Wright, Joshua D ^a   Abbott, Alden F ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890990673     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781849805285.00014     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments (5th ed. 2002), Chicago: American Bar Association.
2. Antitrust Modernization Commission (2007), Report and Recommendations, available at http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/amc/report_recommendation/amc_final_report.pdf.
3. Areeda, P. and H. Hovenkamp (2002), Antitrust Law (2d ed.), New York: Aspen Publishers.
4. Asker, J. (2005), 'Diagnosing Foreclosure Due to Exclusive Dealing' (unpublished working paper), available at http:pages.stern.nyu.edu/~jasker/Paper1_ExclusiveForeclosure.pdf.
5. Bakos, Y. and E. Brynjolfsson (1999), 'Bundling Information Goods: Prices, Profits, and Efficiency', Management Science, 45(12), 1613-30.
6. Bakos, Y. and E. Brynjolfsson (2000), 'Bundling and Competition on the Internet: Aggregations Strategies for Information Goods', Marketing Science, 19(1), 63-82.
7. Baxter, W. and D. Kessler (1998), 'The Law and Economics of Tying Arrangements: Lessons for the Competition Policy Treatment of Intellectual Property', in Anderson, R. and N. Gallini (eds), Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge- Based Economy, Calgary: University of Calgary Press, pp. 137-51.
8. Bernheim, D. and M. Whinston (1998), 'Exclusive Dealing', Journal of Political Economy, 106(1), 64-103.
9. Bork, R. (1978), The Antitrust Paradox, New York: Basic Books.
10. Bowman, W. Jr., (1957), 'Tying Arrangements and the Leveraging Problem', Yale Law Journal, 67(1), 19-36.
11. Bronsteen, P., D. Mills and K. Elzinga (2005), 'Price Competition and Slotting Allowances', Antitrust Bulletin, 50(2), 267-81.
12. Carbajo, J., D. de Meza and D. Seidmann (1990), 'A Strategic Motivation for Commodity Bundling', Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(3), 283-98.
13. Carlton, D., J. Gans and M. Waldman (2007), 'Why Tie a Product Consumers Do Not Use?' (unpublished manuscript), available at http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/papers/Carlton-Gans-Waldman-07-08-09.pdf.
14. Carlton, D. and J. Perloff(2005), Modern Industrial Organization (4th ed), Boston: Addison Wesley.
15. Carlton, D. and M. Waldman (2002), 'The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving Industries', Rand Journal of Economics, 33(2), 194-220.
16. Carlton, D. and M. Waldman (2005), 'Tying, Upgrades, and Switching Costs in Durable- Goods Markets', National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 11407, available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w11407.
17. Cooper, J., L. Froeb, D. O'Brien and M. Vita (2005), 'Vertical Antitrust Policy as a Problem of Inference', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23 (7-8), 639-64 (2005).
18. DeGraba, P. (1996), 'Why Lever into a Zero- Profit Industry: Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion', Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 5(3), 433-47.
19. Evans, D. and M. Salinger (2005), 'Why Do Firms Bundle and Tie? Evidence from Competitive Markets and Implications for Tying Law', Yale Journal on Regulation, 22(1), 37-89.
20. Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice Joint Hearings on Competition and Intellectual Property Law and Policy in the Knowledge- Based Economy (2002).
21. Fumagalli, C. and M. Motta (2006), 'Exclusive Dealing and Entry, When Buyers Compete', American Economic Review, 96(3), 785-95.
22. Glazer, K. and A. Lipsky, Jr. (1995), 'Unilateral Refusals to Deal Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act', Antitrust Law Journal, 63(3), 749-800.
23. Granitz, E. and B. Klein (1996), 'Monopolization by "Raising Rivals' Costs": The Standard Oil Case', Journal of Law & Economics, 39(1), 1-47.
24. Grimes, W. (2002), 'The Antitrust Tying Law Schism: A Critique of Microsoft III and a Response to Hylton and Salinger', Antitrust Law Journal, 70(1), 199-229.
25. Hanssen, F.A. (2000), 'The Block Booking of Films Reexamined', Journal of Law & Economics, 43(2), 395-426.
26. Heide, J., S. Dutta and M. Bergan (1998), 'Exclusive Dealing and Business Efficiency: Evidence from Industry Practice', Journal of Law & Economics, 41(2), 387-408.
27. Hovenkamp, H. (2002), 'IP Ties and Microsoft Rule of Reason', Antitrust Bulletin, 47(2-3), 369-422.
28. Hovenkamp, H., M. Janis and M. Lemley (2002), IP and Antitrust, New York: Aspen Publishers.
29. Jacobson, J. (2002), 'Exclusive Dealing, "Foreclosure," and Consumer Harm', Antitrust Law Journal, 70(2), 311-69.
30. Jacobson, J. and A. Qureshi, (2002) 'Did the Per Se Rule on Tying Survive "Microsoft"?', (14 May 2002, IP- Antitrust Hearings), available at http://www.ftc.gov/opp/intellect/020514jacobson2.pdf.
31. Kaplow, L. and C. Shapiro (2007), 'Antitrust', in Polinksy, A. and S. Shavell (eds), The Handbook of Law and Economics, Amsterdam (London): North- Holland, pp. 1073-225.
32. Kenney, R. and B. Klein (1983), 'The Economics of Block Booking', Journal of Law & Economics, 26(3), 497-540.
33. Kenney, R. and B. Klein (2000), 'How Block Booking Facilitated Self- Enforcing Film Contracts', Journal of Law & Economics, 43(2), 427-36.
34. Klein, B. (2003), 'Exclusive Dealing as Competition for Distribution on the Merits', George Mason Law Review, 12(1), 119-62.
35. Klein, B. and A. Lerner (2007), 'The Expanded Economics of Free- Riding: How Exclusive Dealing Prevents Free- Riding and Creates Undivided Loyalty', Antitrust Law Journal, 74(2), 473-519.
36. Klein, B. and K. Murphy (1988), 'Vertical Restraints as Contract Enforcement Mechanisms', Journal of Law & Economics, 31(2), 265-97.
37. Klein, B. and K. Murphy (2008), 'Exclusive Dealing Intensifies Competition for Distribution', Antitrust Law Journal, 25, 433.
38. Klein, B. and J. Wright (2007), 'The Economics of Slotting Contracts', Journal of Law & Economics, 50(3), 421-54.
39. Kobayashi, B. (2005a), 'Does Economics Provide A Reliable Guide to Regulating Commodity Bundling By Firms? A Survey of the Economic Literature', Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 1(4), 707-46.
40. Kobayashi, B. (2005b), 'The Economics of Loyalty Discounts and Antitrust Law in the United States', Competition Policy International, 1(2), 115-48.
41. Kobayashi, B. (2008), 'Spilled Ink or Economic Progress? The Supreme Court's Decision in Illinois Tool Works v. Independent Ink', 53 Antitrust Bulletin, 5-33, working paper version available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract51084475.
42. Kolasky, W. (2002), 'GE/Honeywell: Continuing the Transatlantic Dialogue', University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 23(3), 513-37.
43. Krattenmaker, T. and S. Salop (1986), 'Anticompetitive Exclusion: Raising Rivals' Costs to Achieve Power Over Price', Yale Law Journal, 96(2), 209-91.
44. Lambert, T. (2005), 'Evaluating Bundled Discounts', Minnesota Law Review, 89(6), 1688-757.
45. Marvel, H. (1982), 'Exclusive Dealing', Journal of Law & Economics, 25(1), 1-25.
46. Nalebuff, B. (2000) 'Competing Against Bundles', in Hammond, P. and G. Mayles (eds), Incentives, Organization & Public Economics: Papers in Honour of Sir James Mirrlees, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 323-35.
47. Posner, R. (2001), Antitrust Law (2d ed), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Rasmussen, E., M. Ramseyer and J. Wiley, Jr. (1991), 'Naked Exclusion', American Economic Review, 81(5), 1137-45.
49. Rey, P., P. Seabright and J. Tirole, 'The Activities of a Monopoly Firm in Adjacent Competitive Markets: Economic Consequences and Implications for Competition Policy', Institut d'Economie Industrielle, Université de Toulouse, Working Paper No. 132, 2002, available at http://idei.fr/doc/wp/2001/sctivities2.pdf.
50. Salinger, M. (2008), 'Business Justifications in Tying Arrangements', in Collins, W. (ed.), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, Chicago: ABA Press, pp. 1911-1928.
51. Salop, S. and D. Scheffman (1983), 'Raising Rivals' Costs', American Economic Review, 73(2), 267-71.
52. Sass, T. (2005), 'The Competitive Effects of Exclusive Dealing: Evidence from the U.S. Beer Industry', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(3-4), 203-225.
53. Schwartz, M. and G. Werden (1996), 'A Quality- Signaling Rationale for Aftermarket Tying', Antitrust Law Journal, 64(2), 387-404.
54. Segal, I. and M. Whinston (2000), 'Naked Exclusion: Comment', American Economic Review, 90(1), 296-309.
55. Simpson, J. and A. Wickelgren (2005), 'Exclusive Dealing and Entry, When Buyers Compete: Comment' (mimeo, June 2005).
56. Simpson, J. and A. Wickelgren (2007), 'Naked Exclusion, Efficient Breach, and Downstream Competition', American Economic Review, 97(4), 1305-20.
57. Steuer, R. (2000), 'Customer Instigated Exclusive Dealing', Antitrust Law Journal, 68(2), 239-51.
58. Stigler, G. (1963), 'United States v. Loew's, Inc.: A Note on Block- Booking', Supreme Court Review, 1963, 152-7.
59. Tom, W., D. Balto and N. Averitt (2000), 'Anticompetitive Aspects of Market- Share Discounts and Other Incentives to Exclusive Dealing', Antitrust Law Journal, 67(3), 615-39.
60. US Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (1995), Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/ipguide.htm.
61. US Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (2007), Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/hearings/ip/222655.pdf.
62. Vistnes, G. (2002), 'Bundling and Tying: Antitrust Analysis in Markets with Intellectual Property', 3-5 (14 May 2002), available at http://www.ftc.gov/opp/intellect/020514vistnesppt2. pdf.
63. Whinston, M. (1990) 'Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion', American Economic Review, 80 (3), 837-59.
64. Whinston, M. (2006), Lectures on Antitrust Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Wright, J. (2006a) 'Antitrust Law and Competition for Distribution', Yale Journal on Regulation, 23 (2), 169-207.
66. Wright, J. (2006b) 'Missed Opportunities in Independent Ink', Cato Supreme Court Review, 5, 333-59.
67. Wright, J. (2009) 'Antitrust Analysis of Category Management: Conwood Co. v. United States Tobacco Co.', 17 Supreme Court Economic Review.
68. Yde, P. and M. Vita (2006), 'Merger Efficiencies: The 'Passing- On' Fallacy', Antitrust, Summer 2006, 59.