Thoracoscopic oesophageal mobilization during thoracolaparoscopy three-stage oesophagectomy: A comparison of lateral decubitus versus semiprone positions

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 829-834

  Lin, Jiangbo ^a   Kang, Mingqiang ^a   Chen, Chun ^a   Lin, Ruobai ^a  

^a FUJIAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Oesophageal cancer; Oesophageal surgery; Thoracoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY POSTURE; CHYLOTHORAX; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED GASTRIC EMPTYING; ERGONOMICS; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LATERAL DECUBITUS POSITION; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEMIPRONE POSITION; STOMACH DISEASE; THORACOLAPAROSCOPY THREE STAGE OESOPHAGECTOMY; THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGEAL MOBILIZATION; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; VOCAL CORD PARALYSIS; AGED; ESOPHAGUS SURGERY; ESOPHAGUS TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OESOPHAGEAL CANCER; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT POSITIONING; THORACOSCOPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

OESOPHAGEAL CANCER; OESOPHAGEAL SURGERY; THORACOSCOPY;

AGED; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRONE POSITION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THORACOSCOPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84890949119     PISSN: 15699293     EISSN: 15699285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivt306     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992;37:7-11.
2. Cuschieri A. Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1994;2:21-5.
3. Lin J, Kang M, Chen C, Lin R, Zheng W, Zhug Y et al. Thoracolaparoscopy oesophagectomy and extensive two-field lymphadenectomy for oesophageal cancer: Introduction and teaching of a new technique in a highvolume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43:115-21.
4. Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T et al. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2010;24:2965-73.
5. Kuwabara S, Katayanagi N. Comparison of three different operative methods of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Esophagus 2010;7:23-9.
6. Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: A head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2485-91.
7. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 2012;256:95-103.
8. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi Rrajan PS et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position-experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203: 7-16.
9. Agasthian T. Revisiting the prone position in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2010;18:364-7.
10. Kang CH, Kim YT, Jeon SH, Sung SW, Kim JH. Lymphadenectomy extent is closely related to long-term survival in esophageal cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:154-60.
11. Hulscher JBF, Van Sandick JW, De Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1662-9.
12. Tchartchian G, Dietzel J, Bojahr B, Hackethal A, De Wilde R. Decreasing strain on the surgeon in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery by using semi-active robotics. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2011;112:72-5.
13. van der Schatte Olivier RH, van Hullenaar CDP, Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robotassisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1365-71.