Sustaining Gendered Practices? Power, Parties, and Elite Political Networks in Argentina

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 85-110

  Franceschet, Susan ^a   Piscopo, Jennifer M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Argentina; candidate backgrounds; gender; legislative politics; political recruitment; women

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890944368     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414013489379     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abuelafia E.,Sergio B.,Miguel B.,Luciano D. G.Who decides on public expenditures? A political economy analysis of the budget process: The case of Argentina. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, Economic and Social Study Series; 2005:.
2. Archenti N.,Johnson N.Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota.Sociología, Problemas, e Prácticas. 2006;52:133-153.
3. Beckwith K.A common language of gender?.Politics & Gender. 2005;1:128-137.
4. Bird K.Who are the women? Where are the women? And what difference can they make? Effects of gender parity in French municipal elections.French Politics. 2003;1:5-38.
5. Bjarnegård E.Gender, informal institutions and political recruitment. Houndmills, Basingtoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013:.
6. Black J. H.,Erickson L.Similarity, compensation, or difference? A comparison of female and male office-seekers.Women & Politics. 2000;21:1-38.
7. Borner J.,Caminotti M.,Marx J.,Rodríguez Gustá A. L.Ideas, presencia, y jerarquías políticas: Claroscuros de la igualdad de género en el Congreso Nacional de Argentina. Buenos Aires: PNUD Argentina and Prometeo Libros; 2009:.
8. Caul Kittilson MChallenging parties, changing parliament. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press; 2006:.
9. Coppedge M.The dynamic diversity of Latin American party systems.Party Politics. 1998;4:547-568.
10. del Mar Martínez Rosón MPoliticians and politics in Latin America. Sáez M. Alcántara, ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2008:235-264.
11. De Luca M.,Jones M. P.,Tula M. I.Back rooms or ballot boxes? Candidate nomination in Argentina.Comparative Political Studies. 2002;35:413-436.
12. Dodson D. L.Change and continuity in the relationship between private responsibilities and public officeholding: The more things change, the more they stay the same.Policy Studies Journal. 1997;25:569-584.
13. Escobar-Lemmon M.,Taylor-Robinson M.Getting to the top: Career paths of women in Latin American cabinets.Political Research Quarterly. 2009;62:685-699.
14. Jones M. P.Pathways to power: Political recruitment and candidate selection in Latin America. Siavelis P. M.Morgenstern S., ed. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 2008:41-75.
15. Jones M. P.,Hwang W.Argentine democracy: The politics of institutional weakness. Levitsky S.Murillo M. V., ed. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 2005:115-138.
16. Jones M. P.,Hwang W.,Micozzi J. P.Government and opposition in the Argentine Congress, 1989-2007: Understanding inter-party dynamics through roll call vote analysis.Journal of Politics in Latin America. 2009;1:67-96.
17. Jones M. P.,Saiegh S.,Spiller P.,Tommasi M.Amateur legislators-professional politicians: The consequences of party-centered electoral rules in a federal system.American Journal of Political Science. 2002;46:656-669.
18. Kenny M.Gender, institutions, and power: A critical review.Politics. 2007;27:91-100.
19. Krook M. L.Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
20. Krook M. L.Beyond supply and demand: A feminist-institutionalist analysis of candidate selection.Political Research Quarterly. 2010;63:707-720.
21. Gender, politics, and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism. Krook M. L.Mackay F., ed. London, England: Palgrave; 2011:.
22. Argentine democracy: The politics of institutional weakness. Levitsky S.Murillo M. V., ed. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 2006:.
23. Lovenduski J.Gendering political research.Annual Review of Political Science. 1998;1:333-356.
24. Mackay F.,Kenny M.,Chappell L.New institutionalism through a gender lens: Towards a feminist institutionalism?.International Political Science Review. 2010;31:573-588.
25. Marx J.,Borner J.,Caminotti M.Las legisladoras: cupos de género y política y Argentina y Brasil. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI Editora Iberoamericana; 2007:.
26. Murray R.Parties, gender quotas, and candidate selection in France. New York, NY: Palgrave; 2010a:.
27. Murray R.Second among equals? A study of whether France's "quota women" are up to the job.Politics & Gender. 2010b;6:93-118.
28. Oakley J. G.Gender-based barriers to senior management positions.Journal of Business Ethics. 2000;27:321-334.
29. Saint-Germain M. A.Paths to power of women legislators in Costa Rica and Nicaragua.Women's Studies International Forum. 1993;16:119-138.
30. Saint-Germain M. A.,Chávez Metoyer C.Women legislators in Central America. Austin: University of Texas Press; 2008:.
31. Schwindt-Bayer L.Women who win: Social backgrounds, paths to power, and political ambition in Latin American legislatures.Politics & Gender. 2011;7:1-33.
32. Pathways to power: Political recruitment and candidate selection in Latin America. Siavelis P.Morgenstern S., ed. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 2008:.
33. Timberlake S.Social capital and gender in the workplace.Journal of Management Development. 2005;24:34-44.
34. Verge T.Quotas' effects on political recruitment, candidates' profiles, and routes to political office. Paper presented at the II European Conference on Gender and Politics; 2011Central European University, Budapest, Hungary; 2011.