Change and continuity in the relationship between private responsibilities and public officeholding: The more things change, the more they stay the same

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 569-584

  Dodson, Debra L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5544252549     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1997.tb00042.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Berkman, M. B., & O'Connor, R. E. (1993). Do women legislators matter? Female legislators and state abortion policy. American Politics Quarterly, 21, 102-124.
2. Blair, D. K., & Henry, A. R. (1981). The family factor in state legislative turnover. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 6, 55-68.
3. Boles, J. K. (1991). Advancing the women's agenda within local legislatures: The role of female elected officials. In L. Dodson (Ed.), Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office (pp. 39-48). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
4. Burrell B. (1994). A woman's place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5. Carroll, K. (1983). The age difference between men and women politicians. Social Science Quarterly, 64, 332-339.
6. Carroll, S. J. (1989). The personal is political: The intersection of private lives and public roles among women and men in elective and appointive office. Women & Politics, 9, 51-67.
7. Carroll, S. J. (1994). Women as candidates in American politics (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
8. Carroll, S. J. (Ed.) (forthcoming). The impact of women in public office. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
9. Carroll, S. J., & Geiger-Parker, B. (1983). Women appointed to state government: A comparison with all stale appointees. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
10. Carroll, S. J., & Strimling, W. (1983). Women's routes to elective office: A comparison with men's. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
11. Center for the American Woman and Politics. (1995). Women in state legislatures 1995. Fact Sheet. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
12. Center for the American Woman and Politics. (1996). Women candidates for state legislatures: Election results 1986, 1988, 1992, 1994 & 1996. Fact Sheet. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
13. Center for the American Woman and Politics. (1997). Women in elective office 1997. Fact Sheet. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
14. Clark, J. (1998). Women at the national level: An update on roll call voting behavior. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office: Past, present and future (pp. 118-129). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15. Considine, M., & Deutchman, E. (1994, September). Narrowing the gap or closing the door: What kinds of women get jobs as legislators? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, NY.
16. Council of State Governments. (1994). The book of the states, 1994-95 edition. Volume 30. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.
17. Darcy, R., Welch, S., & Clark, J. (1994). Women, elections, and representation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
18. Diamond, I. (1977). Sex roles in the state house. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Di Stefano, C. (1997). Integrating gender into the political science curriculum: Challenges, pitfalls, and opportunities. PS: Political Science and Politics, 30 (2), 204-206.
20. Dodson, D. L. (Ed.). (1991). Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
21. Dodson, D. L. (1997, August). Gender difference, institutional constraints, and the representation of women's interests in Congress. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
22. Dodson, D. L. (1998). Representing women's interests in the U.S. House of Representatives. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office: Past, present and future (pp. 130-149). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Dodson, D. L. (forthcoming). Is what they say what they do?: A comparison of the impact of women's and men's attitudes on their legislative behavior. In S. J. Carroll (Ed.), The impact of women in public office. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
24. Dodson, D. L., & Carroll, S. J. (1991). Reshaping the agenda: Women in state legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
25. Dodson, D. L., Carroll, S. J., Mandel, R. B., Kleeman , K. E., Schreiber, R., & Liebowitz, D. (1995). Voices, views, votes: The impact of women in the 103rd Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Rutgers University.
26. Dolan, K., & Ford, L. (1994, August). Women state legislators and change over time: 1972-1992. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, NY.
27. Dubeck, P. J. (1976). Women and access to political office: A comparison of female and male state legislators. Sociological Quarterly, 17, 2-52.
28. Duerst-Lahti, G., & Versiegen, D. (1995). Making something of absence: The "year of the woman" and women's representation. In G. Duerst-Lahti & R. M. Kelly (Eds.), Gender power, leadership and governance (pp. 213-238). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
29. Flammang, J. A. (1985). Female officials in the feminist capital: The case of Santa Clara County. Western Political Quarterly, 38, 94-118.
30. Frankovic, K. A. (1977). Sex and voting in the U.S. House of Representatives 1961-1975. American Politics Quarterly, 5, 315-330.
31. Freeman, P., & Lyons, W. (1992). Female legislators: Is there a new type of woman in office? In G. F. Moncrief & J. A. Thompson (Eds.), Changing patterns in state legislative careers (pp. 59-70). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
32. Gerstel, N., & Gross, H. E. (1995). Gender and families in the United States: The reality of economic dependence. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (5th ed.) (pp. 92-127). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
33. Havens, C. M., & Healy, L. M. (1991). Cabinet-level appointees in Connecticut: Women making a difference. In D. L. Dodson (Ed.), Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office (pp. 21-30). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Rutgers University.
34. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York, NY: Avon.
35. Hoffnung, M. (1995). Motherhood: Contemporary conflict for women. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (5th ed.) (pp. 162-181). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
36. Johnson, M., & Carroll, S. (1978). Profile of women holding office II. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
37. Jones, M. (1997). Legislator gender and legislator policy priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives. Policy Studies Journal, 25(4), 613-629.
38. Kathlene, L. (1989). Uncovering the political impacts of gender An exploratory study. Western Political Quarterly, 42, 397-421.
39. Kathlene, L. (1995). Alternative views of crime: Legislative policy-making in gendered terms. Journal of Politics, 57, 696-723.
40. Kirkpatrick, J. J. (1974). Political woman. New York, NY: Basic Books.
41. Leader, S. G. (1977). The policy impact of elected women officials. In L. Maisel & J. Cooper (Eds.), The impact of the electoral process (pp. 265-284). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. Lee, M. M. (1976). Why so few women hold public office. Political Science Quarterly, 91, 297-314.
43. Lynn, N. B. (1984). Women and politics: The real majority. In Jo Freeman (Ed.), Women: Feminist perspective (3rd ed.) (pp. 264-285). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
44. Mandel, R. B. (1983). In the running: The new woman candidate. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
45. Mandel, R. B., & Dodson, D. L. (1992). Do women officeholders make a difference? In S. E. Rix (Ed.), The American woman, 1992-93 (pp. 149-177). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
46. Mezey, S. G. (1978). Does sex make a difference? A case study of women in politics. Western Political Quarterly, 31, 492-501.
47. Mezey, S. G. (1994). Increasing the number of women in office: Does it matter? In E. A. Cook, S. Thomas, & C. Wilcox (Eds.), The year of the woman: Myths & realities (pp. 255-270). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
48. Nechemias, C. (1985). Geographic mobility and women's access to state legislatures. Western Political Quarterly, 38, 119-131.
49. Nechemias, C. (1987). Changes in the election of women to U.S. state legislative seats. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12, 125-142.
50. Newman, J. (1994). Perception and reality: A study comparing the success of men and women candidates. Washington. DC: National Women's Political Caucus.
51. Phillips, A. (1991). Engendering democracy. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
52. Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
53. Poole, K. T., & Zeigler, L. H. (1985). Women, public opinion & politics. New York, NY: Longman.
54. Reingold, B. (1992). Concepts of representation among female and male state legislators. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17, 509-537.
55. Saint-Germain, M. A. (1989). Does their difference make a difference? The impact of women on public policy in the Arizona legislature. Social Science Quarterly, 7, 956-968.
56. Sapiro, V. (1982). Private costs of public commitments or public costs of private commitments? Family roles versus political ambition. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 265-279.
57. Sapiro, V., & Farah, B. G. (1980). New pride and old prejudice: Political ambitions and role orientations among female partisan elites. Women & Politics, 1, 13-36.
58. Sigel, R. S. (1996). Ambition and accommodation: How women view gender relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59. Squire, P. (1992). Legislative professionalism and membership diversity in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17, 69-79.
60. Stanley, J. R., & Blair, D. D. (1989, August). Gender differences in legislative effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
61. Swain, C. M. (1994). Black faces, black interests. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Tamerius, K. L. (1995). Sex, gender, and leadership in the representation of women. In G. Duerst-Lahti & R. M. Kelly (Eds.), Gender power, leadership and governance (pp. 93-112). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
63. Thomas, S. (1989). Voting patterns in the California assembly: The role of gender. Women & Politics, 9, 43-53.
64. Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65. Thompson, J. A., & Moncrief, G. F. (1993). The implications of term limits for women and minorities: Some evidence from the states. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 300-309.
66. Uhlaner, C., & Scholzman, K. (1986). Candidate gender and congressional campaign receipts. Journal of Politics, 48, 30-50.
67. United States Bureau of the Census. (1992). Statistical abstract of the United States, 1992 (112th ed.). Washington, DC: United States Bureau of the Census.
68. United States Bureau of the Census. (1995). Statistical abstract of the United States, 1995 (115th ed.). Washington, DC: United States Bureau of the Census.
69. Vega, A., & Firestone, J. M. (1995). The effects of gender on congressional behavior and the substantive representation of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20, 213-222.
70. Welch, S. (1985). Are women more liberal than men in the U.S. Congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10, 125-134.