Can we combine structural functionality and landscape services assessments in order to estimate the impact of landscape structure on landscape services?;Je možno zkombinovat hodnocení funkčnosti krajiny s hodnocením krajinných služeb pro odhadnutí dopadu struktury krajiny na její služby?

Moravian Geographical Reports

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 2-15

  Skokanová, Hana ^a  

^a SILVA TAROUCA RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR LANDSCAPE AND ORNAMENTAL GARDENING   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Czech Republic; Landscape assessment; Landscape metrics; Landscape services; Structural functionality

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 84890928773     PISSN: 12108812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/mgr-2013-0016     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ANTROP, M. (2000): Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 77, p. 17-28.
2. BOCK, M. et al. (2005): Spatial indicators for nature conservation from European to local scale. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 5, p. 322-338.
3. BODIN, Ö., TENGÖ, M., NORMAN, A., LUNDBERG, J., ELMQVIST, T. (2006): The value of small size: loss of forest patches and ecological thresholds in Southern Madagascar. Ecological Applications, Vol. 16, p. 440-451.
4. BURKHARD, B., KROLL, F., MÜLLER, F., WINDHORST, W. (2009): Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services-a concept for land-cover based assessment. Landscape Online, Vol. 15, p. 1-22.
5. CUSHMAN, S. A., MCGARIGAL, K., NEEL, M. C. (2008): Parsimony in landscape metrics: strength, universality and consistency. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 8, p. 691-703.
6. DAUBER, J. et al. (2003): Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 98, p. 321-329.
7. de GROOT, R. (2006): Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 75, p. 175-186.
8. de GROOT, R. S., WILSON, M. A., BOUMAND, R. M. J. (2002): A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, Vol. 41, p. 393-408.
9. DRAMSTAD, W. E., TVEIT, M. S., FJELLSTAD, W. J., FRY, G. L. A. (2006): Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 78, p. 465-474.
10. ESRI, Inc. (1999-2008): ArcMap 9. 3. Redlands, CA.
11. ESSL, F., EGGER, G., ELLMAUER, T., AIGNER, S. (2002): Rote Liste der gefährdeten Biotoptypen Österreichs: Konzept. UBA-Monographien, Umweltbundesamt, Wien. 40 pp.
12. FARIG, L. (2003): Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, Vol. 34, p. 487-515.
13. FELD, C. K. et al. (2007): Assessing and monitoring ecosystems-indicators, concepts and their linkage to biodiversity and ecosystem services. The RUBICODE Project. 108 p. [online] available at: http://www. rubicode. net/rubicode/RUBICODE_Review_on_Indicators. pdf.
14. FORMAN, R. T. T., GODRON, M. (1986): Landscape Ecology. John Willey and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA. 619 pp.
15. FRANK, S., FÜRST, C., KOSCHKE, L., MAKESCHIN, F. (2012): A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 21, p. 30-38.
16. HAINES-YOUNG, R., CHOPPING, M. (1996): Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 20, p. 418-445.
17. HAINES-YOUNG, R., POTSCHIN, M. (2008): England's Terrestrial Ecosystem Services and the Ecosystem Approach. Full Technical Report. 89 pp.
18. HERMANN, A. et al. (2013): Assessment framework for landscape services in European cultural landscapes: An Austrian Hungarian case study. Ecological Indicators. (In press).
19. HERMANN, A., SCHLEIFER, S., WRBKA, T. (2011): The concept of ecosystem services regarding landscape research: A review. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, Vol. 5, p. 1-37.
20. HOKIT, D. G., STITH, B. M., BRANCH, L. C. (1999): Effects of landscape structure in Florida scrub: A population perspective. Ecological Applications, Vol. 9, p. 124-134.
21. KONG, F., YIN, H., NAKAGOSHI, N. (2007): Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity vaule of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 79, p. 240-252.
22. KUIPER, J. (1998): Landscape quality based upon diversity, coherence and continuity: Landscape planning at different planning-levels in the River area of The Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 43, p. 91-104.
23. KUTTNER, M., HAINZ-RENETZEDER, C., HERMANN, A., WRBKA, T. (2013): Borders without barriers-Structural functionality and green infrastructure in the Austrian-Hungarian transboundary region of Lake Neusiedl. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 31, p. 59-72.
24. LAUTENBACH, S., KUGEL, C., LAUSCH, A., SEPPELT, R. (2011): Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 11, p. 676-687.
25. MCGARIGAL, K., CUSHMAN, S. A., NEEL, M., ENE, E. (2002): FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. [online] Available at: http://www. umass. edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats. html.
26. MEA (2005): Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis Report. Island Press, Washington, DC., 155 pp.
27. MOSER, B., JAEGER, A. G., TAPPEINER, U., TASSER, E., EISELT, B. (2007): Modification of the effective mesh size for measuring landscape fragmentation to solve the boundary problem. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 22, p. 447-459.
28. MÍCHAL, I. (1994): Ekologická stabilita. Veronica, Brno. 275 pp.
29. NAVEH, Z., LIEBERMAN, A. (1994): Landscape ecology, Theory and Applicaton. Springer-Verlag, USA, New York. 356 pp.
30. NG, C. N., XIE, Y. J., YU, X. J. (2013): Integrating landscape connectivity into the evaluation of ecosystem services for biodiversity conservation and its implications for landscape planning. Applied Geography, Vol. 42, p. 1-12.
31. NOVÁKOVÁ, J., SKALOŠ, J., KAŠPAROVÁ, I. (2006): Krajinná ekologie. Skripta ke cvièením. Lesnická práce, Kostelec nad Èernými Lesy. 31 pp.
32. PELLANTOVÁ, J. [ed.] (1994): Metodika mapování krajiny pro potøeby ochrany pøírody a krajiny ve smyslu zákona ÈNR 114/92 Sb. ÈÚOP Praha-Výzkumné a monitorovací pracovištì v Brnì, Praha. 34 pp.
33. PETROVIÈ, F. (2005): Vývoj krajiny v oblasti štálového osídlenia Pohronského Inovca a Tribeèa. Ústav krajinnej ekológie SAV, poboèka Nitra, Bratislava. 209 pp.
34. POTSCHIN, M. (2009): Land use and the state of the natural environment. Land Use Policy, Vol. 26, p. S170-S177.
35. PUCHEROVÁ, Z. [ed.] (2007): Druhotná krajinná štruktúra (Metodická príruèka k mapovaniu). UKF v Nitre, Nitra. 124 pp.
36. RIITERS, K. H. et al. (1995): A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 10, p. 29-39.
37. SEJÁK, J. et al. (2010): Hodnocení funkcí a sluzeb ekosystému Ceské republiky. Fakulta zivotního prostredí UJEP v Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem. 198 pp.
38. SEPPELT, R. et al. (2012): Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 21, p. 145-154.
39. SHERROUSE, B. C., CLEMENT, J. M., SEMMENS, D. J. (2011): A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography, Vol. 31, p. 748-760.
40. SCHINDLER, S., POIRAZIDIS, K., WRBKA, T. (2008): Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments. A case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 8, p. 502-514.
41. SKOKANOVÁ, H., EREMIÁŠOVÁ, R. (2012): Changes in the secondary landscape structure and the connection to ecological stability: the cases of two model areas in the Czech Republic. Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 31, p. 33-45.
42. SKOKANOVÁ, H., EREMIÁŠOVÁ, R. (2013): Landscape functionality in protected and unprotected areas: Case studies from the Czech Republic. Ecological Informatics, Vol. 14, p. 71-74.
43. STATSOFT, Inc. (2004): STATISTICA Cz, version 10. 0. Available at www. statsoft. cz.
44. SU, S., XIAO, R., JIANG, Z., ZHANG, Y. (2012): Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem services value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale. Applied Geography, Vol. 34, p. 295-305.
45. SYRBE, R.-U., WALZ, U. (2012): Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefitting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 21, p. 80-88.
46. STEINHARDT, U., HERZOG, F., LAUSCH, A., MÜLLER, E., LEHMANN, S. (1999): Hemeroby index for landscape monitoring and evaluation. In: Hyatt, D. E., Lenz, R. J. [eds.]: Environmental indices-System analysis approach. EOLSS Publ., Oxford, pp. 237-254.
47. TERMORSHUIZEN, J., OPDAM, P. (2009): Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 24, p. 1037-1052.
48. TISCHENDORF, L. (2001): Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? Landscape Ecology, Vol. 16, p. 235-254.
49. TSCHARNTKE, T., STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I., KRUESS, A., THIES, C. (2002): Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: A mini review. Ecological Research, Vol. 17, p. 229-239.
50. VAN DER HORST, D. (2011): Adoption of payments for ecosystem services: an application of the Hägerstrand model. Applied Geography, Vol. 31, p. 668-676.
51. VONDRUŠKOVÁ, H. [ed.] (1994): Metodika mapování krajiny. SMS Hradec Králové, Praha. 55 pp.
52. WAGNER, H. H., FORTIN, M. J. (2005): Analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology, Vol. 86, p. 1975-1987.
53. WAINGER, L. A., KING, D. M, MACK, R. N., PRICE, E. W., MASLIN, T. (2010): Can the concept of ecosystem services be practially applied to improve natural resource managament decisions? Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, p. 978-987.
54. WALLACE, K. J. (2007): Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, Vol. 139, p. 235-246.
55. WEINSTOERFFER, J., GIRARDIN, P. (2000): Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: use of a landscape indicator. Ecological Modelling, Vol. 130, p. 95-109.
56. WILLEMEN, L., VERBURG, P. H., HEIN, L., van MENSVOORT, M. E. F. (2008): Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 88, p. 34-43.
57. YAPP, G., WALKER, J., THACKWAY, R. (2010): Linking vegetation type and condition to ecosystem goods and services. Ecological Complexity, Vol. 7, p. 292-301.