A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 21, Issue , 2012, Pages 30-38

  Frank, Susanne ^a   Fürst, Christine ^a   Koschke, Lars ^a   Makeschin, Franz ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecosystem service assessment; Landscape metrics; Landscape planning; Landscape structure; Pimp Your Landscape

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LANDSCAPE METRICS; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES; PIMP YOUR LANDSCAPE;

CELLULAR AUTOMATA; ECOSYSTEMS; REFORESTATION;

URBAN PLANNING;

AFFORESTATION; AGRICULTURAL LAND; AUTOMATION; BIOTOPE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONNECTIVITY; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ESTHETICS; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; SOFTWARE;

GERMANY;

EID: 84860291363     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.027     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Augenstein, I.; 2002. Die Ästhetik der Landschaft. Ein Bewertungsverfahren für die planerische Umweltvorsorge. Diss. Weißensee-Verlag, Berlin.
2. C. Baessler, and S. Klotz Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 115 2006 43 50
3. D.J.B. Baldwin Sensitivity of landscape pattern indices to input data characteristics on real landscapes: implications for their use in natural disturbance emulation Landscape Ecology 19 2004 255 271
4. O. Bastian, and K.-F. Schreiber Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft 1999 Spektrum Akad. Verl Heidelberg, Berlin
5. Beck, S.; et al.; 2006. UFZ-Bericht 2/2006. Die Relevanz des Millennium Ecosystem Assessment für Deutschland. UFZ - Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle GmbH in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft, Leipzig, p. 118.
6. R. Billeter Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study Journal of Applied Ecology 45 2008 141 150
7. Blaschke, T.; 1999. Quantifizierung der Struktur einer Landschaft mit GIS: Potential und Probleme. In: Walz, U. (Ed.), Erfassung und Bewertung der Landschaftsstruktur für Umweltmonitoring und Raumplanung, Dresden, pp. 9-24.
8. B.M.U. National Strategy on Biological Diversity. Adopted by the Federal Cabinet on 7 November 2007 2007 Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conversation and Nuclear Safety Bonn
9. BNatSchG, 2010. Bundesnaturschutzgesetz. Gesetz über Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, first version 14.05.1967, actualized 01.03.2010, Bundesgesetzblatt 1/2010.
10. B. Burkhard Ecosystem services - bridging ecology, economy and social sciences Ecological Complexity 7 2010 257 259
11. A. Buyantuyev, and J. Wu Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern analysis Landscape Ecology 22 2007 7 13
12. G. Castilla The impact of thematic resolution on the patch-mosaic model of natural landscapes Landscape Ecology 24 2009 15 23
13. V.H. Dale, and S. Polasky Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services Ecological Economics 64 2007 286 296
14. R. de Groot Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes Landscape and Urban Planning 75 2006 175 186
15. R.S. de Groot Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making Ecological Complexity 7 2010 260 272
16. R.S. de Groot A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services Ecological Economics 41 2002 393 408
17. E. Díaz-Varela Multiscale delineation of landscape planning units based on spatial variation of land-use patterns in Galicia, NW Spain Landscape and Ecological Engineering 5 2009 1 10
18. F. Dieleman, and M. Wegener Compact city and urban sprawl Built Environment 30 4 2004 308 323
19. W.E. Dramstad Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure Landscape and Urban Planning 78 2006 465 474
20. G. Eiden Quantifying landscape structures: spatial and temporal dimensions EC EEA From Landcover to Landscape Diversity in the European Union 2000 European Commission and European Environmental Agency http://ec.europa.eu/ agriculture/publi/landscape/index.htm
21. J. Farley, and R. Costanza Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global Ecological Economics 69 2010 2060 2068
22. C.K. Feld Assessing and monitoring ecosystems - indicators, concepts and their linkage to biodiversity and ecosystem services RUBICODE Rationalising Biodiversity Conservation in Dynamic Ecosystems 2007 p. 108 http://www.rubicode. net/rubicode/RUBICODE-Review-on-Indicators.pdf
23. Franco The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation The Role of a Landscape Ecological Network on a Socio-Cultural Process 2003 Elsevier Amsterdam PAYS-BAS
24. Frank, S.; et al.; 2010a. Chances and limits of using landscape metrics within the interactive planning tool "Pimp Your Landscape". In: C.-C.-I.-.Inra (Ed.), Proceedings LandMod2010, Montpellier, France, p. 13 (www.symposcience.org/, accessed at 28.11.2010).
25. Frank, S.; et al.; 2010b. Landschaftsbewertung zur Unterstützung regionaler Planung: Landschaftsstrukturmaße als Indikatoren ökologischer Intaktheit. In: Korn, H.; et al. (Eds.), Biodiversität und Klima - Vernetzung der Akteure in Deutschland VII - Ergebnisse und Dokumentation des 7, Workshops, vol. 282. Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN), Insel Vilm, pp. 49-52.
26. Frank, S.; et al.; 2010c. A regionally adaptable approach of landscape assessment using landscape metrics within the 2D cellular automaton "Pimp your landscape". In: Azevedo, J.C.; et al. (Eds.), IUFRO Landscape Ecology Working Group International Conference. Instituto Politécnico de Bragana, Portugal, Bragana, Portugal, p. 757.
27. G. Fry The ecology of visual landscapes: exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators Ecological Indicators 9 2009 933 947
28. C. Fürst Pimp your landscape - a generic approach for integrating regional stakeholder needs into land use planning Ecology and Society 15 3 2010 34 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art34/
29. Fürst, C.; et al.; in preparation. Integrating land management aspects in the impact assessment of land cover changes on Ecosystem Services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management.
30. C. Fürst How to support forest management in a world of change: results of some regional studies Environmental Management 2009 1 12
31. C. Fürst Pimp Your Landscape: a tool for qualitative evaluation of the effects of regional planning measures on ecosystem services Environmental Management 2010 1 16
32. Gao, J.; Li, S.; 2011. Detecting spatially non-stationary and scale-dependent relationships between urban landscape fragmentation and related factors using Geographically Weighted Regression. Applied Geography, doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.06.003, in press.
33. E.H. Girvetz Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: a statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA Landscape and Urban Planning 86 2008 205 218
34. D. Haase Changes to central european landscapes - analysing historical maps to approach current environmental issues, examples from Saxony, Central Germany Land Use Policy 24 2007 248 263
35. H. Herbst Contribution of landscape metrics to the assessment of scenic quality - the example of the landscape structure plan Havelland/Gemany Landscape Online 10 2009 1 17
36. J. Huang A global comparative analysis of urban form: applying spatial metrics and remote sensing Landscape and Urban Planning 82 2007 184 197
37. M. Hunziker, and F. Kienast Potential impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty - a prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment Landscape Ecology 14 1999 161 176
38. J.A.G. Jaeger Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation Landscape Ecology 15 2000 115 130
39. J.A.G. Jaeger Implementing landscape fragmentation as an indicator in the swiss monitoring system of sustainable development (Monet) Journal of Environmental Management 88 2008 737 751
40. B. Jessel Elements, characteristics and character - information functions of landscapes in terms of indicators Ecological Indicators 6 2006 153 167
41. K.-H. Kim, and S. Pauleit Landscape character, biodiversity and land use planning: the case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea Land Use Policy 24 2007 264 274
42. Koschke, L.; et al.; submitted for publication. Using a multi-criteria approach for the integrated land cover based assessment of ecosystem services as an evaluation basis for the modified 2-D cellular automaton Pimp your landscape. Ecological Indicators.
43. E. Krüsemann Der Biotopverbund nach § 3 BNatSchG Natur und Recht 28 2006 546 554
44. S. Lang, and T. Blaschke Landschaftsanalyse mit GIS 2007 Ulmer Stuttgart
45. S. Lautenbach Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data Ecological Indicators 11 2010 676 687
46. X. Li The adequacy of different landscape metrics for various landscape patterns Pattern Recognition 38 2005 2626 2638
47. D. Lindenmayer A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation Ecology Letters 11 2008 78 91
48. M.A. Millennium ecosystem assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis 2005 Island Press Washington, D.C
49. McGarigal, K.; et al.; 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer Software Program Produced by the Authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at: www.umass.edu/landeco/ research/fragstats/fragstats.html (accessed: 17.03.2010).
50. S. Menzel, and J. Teng Ecosystem services as a stakeholder-driven concept for conservation science Conservation Biology 24 2010 907 909
51. J.F. Palmer Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis Massachusetts Landscape and Urban Planning 69 2004 201 218
52. M.B. Potschin, and R.H. Haines-Young Are Landscapes Self-organising? GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 10 2001 165 167
53. Rannow, S.; et al.; 2010. Potential impacts of climate change in Germany - Identifying regional priorities for adaptation activities in spatial planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.017, in press.
54. C. Renetzeder Can we measure ecological sustainability? Landscape pattern as an indicator for naturalness and land use intensity at regional, national and European level Ecological Indicators 10 2010 39 48
55. J.P. Rossi, and I. van Halder Towards indicators of butterfly biodiversity based on a multiscale landscape description Ecological Indicators 10 2010 452 458
56. RP, 2009. Regionalplan 1. Gesamtfortschreibung 2009, in der Fassung des Satzungsbeschlusses VV 12/2008 vom 15.12.2008, des Nachtragsbeschlusses zur Satzung VV 02/2009 vom 25.02.2009 und des Genehmigungsbescheides vom 28.08.2009.
57. S. Saura, and J. Martíez- Millán Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to map spatial extent Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67 2001 1027 1036
58. Sherrouse, B.C.; et al.; 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography, doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002, in press.
59. SRU, 2000. Umweltgutachten 2000 - Schritte ins nächste Jahrtausend. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart.
60. U. Steinhardt The Hemeroby Index for landscape monitoring and evaluation Y.A. Pykh, Environmental Indices. Systems Analysis Approach 1999 EOLSS Oxford Oxford 237 257
61. E. Tasser Biodiversity indicators for sustainability monitoring at municipality level: An example of implementation in an alpine region Ecological Indicators 8 2008 204 223
62. TEEB, 2010. A Quick Guide to The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Local and Regional Policy Makers, 2010 (www.teebweb.org, accessed at 28.11.2010).
63. J. Termorshuizen, and P. Opdam Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development Landscape Ecology 24 2009 1037 1052
64. Thinh, N.X.; 2004. Entwicklung von Maßen zur Charakterisierung und Bewertung des räumlichen Ordnungsgefüges von Stadtlandschaften. In: Walz, U. (Ed.), Landschaftsstruktur im Kontext von naturräumlicher Vor-prägung und Nutzung - Datengrundlagen, Methoden und Anwendungen. IÖR, Dresden, pp. 237-254.
65. Uuemaa, E.; et al.; 2009. Landscape Metrics and Indices: An Overview of Their Use in Landscape Research. Living Review Landscape Research 3.(http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2009-1, cited on 17.03.2010).
66. C. von Haaren, and M. Reich The German way to greenways and habitat networks Landscape and Urban Planning 76 2006 7 22
67. L.A. Wainger Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions? Ecological Economics 69 2010 978 987
68. D.H. Walker Integrating research results into decision making about natural resource management at a catchment scale Agricultural Systems 69 2001 85 98
69. J. Watling, and J. Orrock Measuring edge contrast using biotic criteria helps define edge effects on the density of an invasive plant Landscape Ecology 25 2010 69 78
70. T. Wrbka Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators Land Use Policy 21 2004 289 306
71. G. Yapp Linking vegetation type and condition to ecosystem goods and services Ecological Complexity 7 2010 292 301
72. C.-T. Yeh, and S.-L. Huang Investigating spatiotemporal patterns of landscape diversity in response to urbanization Landscape and Urban Planning 93 2009 151 162
73. M. Zebisch Landscape response functions for biodiversity - assessing the impact of land-use changes at the county level Landscape and Urban Planning 67 2004 157 172
74. Zebisch, M.; 2004. Modellierung der Auswirkungen von Landnutzungsä nderungen auf Landschaftsmuster und Biodiversität. Fakultät VII-Architektur, Umwelt, Gesellschaft, vol. Doktor der Naturwissenschaften. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, p. 198.