Influence of feed concentration and transmembrane pressure on membrane fouling and effect of hydraulic flushing on the performance of ultrafiltration

Desalination

Volumn 335, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-8

  Huang, Jinhui ^a   Liu, Liuxia ^a   Zeng, Guangming ^a   Li, Xue ^b   Peng, Lei ^a   Li, Fei ^a   Jiang, Yongbing ^a   Zhao, Yong ^a   Huang, Xiaolong ^a  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHANGSHA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Hydraulic flushing; Membrane fouling; Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration; Sodium dodecyl sulfate

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; CRITICAL MICELLE CONCENTRATION (CMC); HYDRAULIC FLUSHING; MEMBRANE SEPARATION; MICELLAR ENHANCED ULTRAFILTRATION; SURFACTANT ADSORPTION; SURFACTANT MICELLES; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

CRITICAL MICELLE CONCENTRATION; MEMBRANE FOULING; METAL IONS; THERMOMECHANICAL PULPING PROCESS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER FILTRATION;

SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE;

ADSORPTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FOULING; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE; MEMBRANE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER;

EID: 84890916308     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.038     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Fang Y.-Y., Zeng G.-M., Huang J.-H., Liu J.-X., Xu X.-M., Xu K., Qu Y.-H. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of cadmium ions with anionic-nonionic surfactants. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320(1-2):514-519.
2. Jadhav S., Verma N., Sharma A. Flux and retention analysis during micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for the removal of phenol and aniline. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 24(3):541-557.
3. 2+ from synthetic wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration with hollow fiber membrane. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 294(1):140-146.
4. Li S., Heijman S.G.J., Verberk J.Q.J.C., Le Clech P., Lu J., Kemperman A.J.B., Amy G.L., van Dijk J.C. Fouling control mechanisms of demineralized water backwash: reduction of charge screening and calcium bridging effects. Water Res. 2011, 45(19):6289-6300.
5. Salahi A., Abbasi M., Mohammadi T. Permeate flux decline during UF of oily wastewater: experimental and modeling. Desalination 2010, 251(1-3):153-160.
6. Kaya Y., Barlas H., Arayici S. Evaluation of fouling mechanisms in the nanofiltration of solutions with high anionic and nonionic surfactant contents using a resistance-in-series model. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 367(1-2):45-54.
7. Howe K.J., Clark M.M. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36(16):3571-3576.
8. Danis U., Aydiner C. Investigation of process performance and fouling mechanisms in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of nickel-contaminated waters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162(2-3):577-587.
9. Daniş Ü., Keskinler B. Chromate removal from wastewater using micellar enhanced crossflow filtration: effect of transmembrane pressure and crossflow velocity. Desalination 2009, 249(3):1356-1364.
10. JÖnsson C., JÖnsson A.-S. Influence of the membrane material on the adsorptive fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 108:79-87.
11. Broeckmann A., Busch J., Wintgens T., Marquardt W. Modeling of pore blocking and cake layer formation in membrane filtration for wastewater treatment. Desalination 2006, 189(1-3):97-109.
12. Kim H.-G., Park C., Yang J., Lee B., Kim S.-S., Kim S. Optimization of backflushing conditions for ceramic ultrafiltration membrane of disperse dye solutions. Desalination 2007, 202(1-3):150-155.
13. Choi H., Zhang K., Dionysiou D., Oerther D., Sorial G. Effect of permeate flux and tangential flow on membrane fouling for wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 45(1):68-78.
14. Zsirai T., Buzatu P., Aerts P., Judd S. Efficacy of relaxation, backflushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2012, 46(14):4499-4507.
15. Lamminen M.O., Walker H.W., Weavers L.K. Cleaning of particle-fouled membranes during cross-flow filtration using an embedded ultrasonic transducer system. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 283(1-2):225-232.
16. Zhang Y., Tian J., Liang H., Nan J., Chen Z., Li G. Chemical cleaning of fouled PVC membrane during ultrafiltration of algal-rich water. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2011, 23(4):529-536.
17. Liu T., Chen Z.-l., Yu W.-z., Shen J.-m., Gregory J. Effect of two-stage coagulant addition on coagulation-ultrafiltration process for treatment of humic-rich water. Water Res. 2011, 45(14):4260-4268.
18. Reddy A.V.R., Mohan D.J., Bhattacharya A., Shah V.J., Ghosh P.K. Surface modification of ultrafiltration membranes by preadsorption of a negatively charged polymer. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 214(2):211-221.
19. Laitinen N., Luonsi A., Levänen E., Nyström M. Effect of backflushing conditions on ultrafiltration of board industry wastewaters with ceramic membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 25(1):323-331.
20. Huang J.-h., Zeng G.-m., Qu Y.-h., Zhang Z. Adsorption characteristics of zinc ions on sodium dodecyl sulfate in process of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. 2007, 17(5):1112-1117.
21. Landaburu-Aguirre J., Pongrácz E., Keiski R.L. Separation of cadmium and copper from phosphorous rich synthetic waters by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 81(1):41-48.
22. Chhatre A., Marathe K. Dynamic analysis and optimization of surfactant dosage in micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of nickel from aqueous streams. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41(12):2755-2770.
23. Zeng G.-M., Li X., Huang J.-H., Zhang C., Zhou C.-F., Niu J., Shi L.-J., He S.-B., Li F. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of cadmium and methylene blue in synthetic wastewater using SDS. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 185(2):1304-1310.
24. Singh G., Song L. Influence of sodium dodecyl sulfate on colloidal fouling potential during ultrafiltration. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2006, 281(1):138-146.
25. Huang J.-H., Zhou C.-F., Zeng G.-M., Li X., Niu J., Huang H.-J., Shi L.-J., He S.-B. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of methylene blue from dye wastewater via a polysulfone hollow fiber membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 365(1-2):138-144.
26. Li X., Zeng G.-M., Huang J.-H., Zhang D.-M., Shi L.-J., He S.-B., Ruan M. Simultaneous removal of cadmium ions and phenol with MEUF using SDS and mixed surfactants. Desalination 2011, 276(1):136-141.
27. Huang J.-H., Zeng G.-M., Xu K., Fang Y.-Y. Removal of cadmium ions from aqueous solution via micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2005, 15:184-189.
28. Zeng G.-M., Xu K., Huang J.-H., Li X., Fang Y.-Y., Qu Y.-H. Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of phenol in synthetic wastewater using polysulfone spiral membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 310(1):149-160.
29. 2+ removal by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Desalination 2012, 294:67-73.
30. Llorens J., Pujolà M., Sabaté J. Separation of cadmium from aqueous streams by polymer enhanced ultrafiltration: a two-phase model for complexation binding. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 239(2):173-181.
31. Purkait M., DasGupta S., De S. Resistance in series model for micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of eosin dye. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 270(2):496-506.
32. Mizoguchi K., Fukui K., Yanagishita H. Ultrafiltration behavior of a new type of non-ionic surfactant around the CMC. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208(1):285-288.
33. Cabero M., Riera F., Alvarez R. Rinsing of ultrafiltration ceramic membranes fouled with whey proteins: effects on cleaning procedures. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 154(2):239-250.
34. Qaisrani T., Samhaber W. Impact of gas bubbling and backflushing on fouling control and membrane cleaning. Desalination 2011, 266(1):154-161.
35. Liang H., Gong W., Chen J., Li G. Cleaning of fouled ultrafiltration (UF) membrane by algae during reservoir water treatment. Desalination 2008, 220(1-3):267-272.