Prevalence and persistence of potentially pathogenic and antibiotic resistant bacteria during anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 153, Issue , 2014, Pages 284-291

  Resende, Juliana Alves ^a   Silva, Vânia Lúcia ^a   de Oliveira, Tamara Lopes Rocha ^a   de Oliveira Fortunato, Samuel ^a   da Costa Carneiro, Jailton ^b   Otenio, Marcelo Henrique ^b   Diniz, Cláudio Galuppo ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF JUIZ DE FORA   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Antimicrobial resistance; Biofertilizer dairy cattle manure; Biogas; Pathogenic bacteria

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; ANTIBIOTICS; BIOGAS; FERTILIZERS; MANURES; MICROORGANISMS;

ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT BACTERIA; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCES; ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY; DAIRY CATTLE MANURE; DRUG-RESISTANT BACTERIA; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; GRAM-POSITIVE COCCI; PATHOGENIC BACTERIUM;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

AMIKACIN; AMPICILLIN; CEFEPIME; CHLORAMPHENICOL; COTRIMOXAZOLE; ERYTHROMYCIN; GENTAMICIN; LEVOFLOXACIN; MEROPENEM; METHANE; OXACILLIN; PENICILLIN DERIVATIVE; PIPERACILLIN PLUS TAZOBACTAM; RIFAMPICIN; SULTAMICILLIN; VANCOMYCIN;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; BACTERIUM; BIOGAS; EFFLUENT; FERMENTATION; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; MANURE; PATHOGENICITY; SANITATION;

ALCALIGENES FAECALIS; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; CATTLE; CITROBACTER FREUNDII; DRUG SENSITIVITY; EFFLUENT; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; ENTEROCOCCUS CASSELIFLAVUS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; ENTEROCOCCUS HIRAE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FECAL COLIFORM; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; MANURE; MICROBIAL IDENTIFICATION; MORGANELLA MORGANII; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS ALCALIGENES; RALSTONIA PICKETTII; STREPTOCOCCUS BOVIS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; BIOFERTILIZER DAIRY CATTLE MANURE; BIOGAS; PATHOGENIC BACTERIA;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOFUELS; BIOREACTORS; CATTLE; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DRUG RESISTANCE, MICROBIAL; HUMANS; MANURE; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; PILOT PROJECTS; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84890911966     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abdul P., Lloyd D. The survival of antibiotic resistant and sensitive Escherichia coli strains during anaerobic digestion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1985, 22:373-377.
2. Abubaker J., Risberg K., Pell M. Biogas residues as fertilisers - effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities. Appl. Energ. 2012, 99:126-134.
3. APHA, 2005. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. American Water Works Association.
4. Alvarez R., Villca S., Lidén G. Biogas production from llama and cow manure at high altitude. Biomass Bioenerg. 2006, 30:66-75.
5. Bagge E., Sahlström L., Albihn A. The effect of hygienic treatment on the microbial flora of biowaste at biogas plants. Water Res. 2005, 39:4879-4886.
6. Beneragama N., Yusuke M., Yamashiro T., Iwasaki M., Adekunle L.S., Umetsu K. The survival of cefazolin resistant bacteria in thermophilic co-digestion of dairy manure and waste milk. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 1181-1186.
7. Beneragama N., Iwasaki M., Lateef S.A., Yamashiro T., Ihara I., Umetsu K. The survival of multidrug-resistant bacteria in thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure and waste milk. Anim. Sci. J. 2012, 10.1111/asj.12017.
8. Berneta N., Béline F. Challenges and innovations on biological treatment of livestock effluents. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5431-5436.
9. Chae K.J., Jang A., Yim S.K., Kim I.S. The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:1-6.
10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 22nd informational supplement. Document M100-S22. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
11. Costa P.M., Loureiro L., Matos A.J.F. Transfer of multidrug-resistant bacteria between intermingled ecological niches: the interface between humans, animals and the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 2013, 10:278-294.
12. Di Iaconi C. Biological treatment and ozone oxidation: integration or couplingα. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 106:63-68.
13. Diniz C.G., Farias L.M., Carvalho M.A.R., Rocha E.R., Smith C.J. Differential gene expression in a Bacteroides fragilis metronidazole-resistant mutant. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 54:100-108.
14. Dungan R.S., Klein M., Leytema A.B. Quantification of bacterial indicators and zoonotic pathogens in dairy wastewater ponds. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2012, 78:8089-8095.
15. Fisher K., Philips C. The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology 2009, 155:1749-1757.
16. Heuer H., Schmitt H., Smalla K. Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011, 14:236-243.
17. Holm-Nielsen J.B., Seadi T.A., Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5478-5484.
18. Karim K., Klasson K.T., Hoffmann R., Drescher S.R., DePaoli D.W., Al-Dahhan M.H. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mixing. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:1607-1612.
19. Krumperman P.H. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing Escherichia coli to identify risk sources of faecal contamination of foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983, 46:165-170.
20. Kunz A., Miele M., Steinmetz R.L.R. Advanced swine manure treatment and utilization in Brazil. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5485-5489.
21. Magiorakos A.P., Srinivasan A., Carey R.B., Carmeli Y., Falagas M.E., Giske C.G., Harbarth S., Hindler J.F., Kahlmeter G., Olsson-Liljequist B., Paterson D.L., Rice L.B., Stelling J., Struelens M.J., Vatopoulos A., Weber J.T., Monnet D.L. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18:268-281.
22. Martensa W., Böhm R. Overview of the ability of different treatment methods for liquid and solid manure to inactivate pathogens. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5374-5378.
23. Munir M., Xagoraraki I. Levels of antibiotic resistance genes in manure, biosolids, and fertilized soil. J. Environ. Qual. 2011, 40:248-255.
24. Nicholson F.A., Groves S.J., Chambers B.J. Pathogen survival during livestock manure storage and following land application. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:135-143.
25. Pandey P.K., Soupir M.L. Escherichia coli inactivation kinetics in anaerobic digestion of dairy manure under moderate, mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. AMB Express 2011, 1:18. 10.1186/2191-0855-1-18.
26. Parveen S., Lukasik J., Scott T.M., Tamplin M.L., Portier K.M., Sheperd S., Braun K., Farrah S.R. Geographical variation in antibiotic resistance profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from swine, poultry, beef and dairy cattle farm water retention ponds in Florida. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 100:50-57.
27. Rico J.L., García H., Rico C., Tejero I. Characterization of solid and liquid fractions of dairy manure with regard to their component distribution and methane production. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:971-979.
28. Sahlström L. A review of survival of pathogenic bacteria in organic waste used in biogas plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87:161-166.
29. Saunders O., Harrison J., Fortuna A.M., Whitefield E., Bary A. Effect of anaerobic digestion and application method on the presence and survivability of E. coli and fecal coliforms in dairy waste applied to soil. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2012, 223:1055-1063.
30. Sawant A.A., Hegde N.V., Straley B.A., Donaldson S.C., Love B.C., Knabel S.J., Jayarao B. Antimicrobial-resistant enteric bacteria from dairy cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:156-163.
31. Smith S.R., Lang N.L., Cheung K.H.M., Spanoudaki K. Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes. Waste Manage. 2005, 25:417-425.
32. Thames C.H., Pruden A., James R.E., Ray P.P., Knowlton K.F. Excretion of antibiotic resistance genes by dairy calves fed milk replacers with varying doses of antibiotics. Front Microbiol. 2012, 3:139.
33. Venglovsky J., Martinez J., Placha I. Hygienic and ecological risks connected with utilization of animal manures and biosolids in agriculture. Livest Sci. 2006, 102:197-203.
34. Venglovsky J., Sasakova N., Placha I. Pathogens and antibiotic residues in animal manures and hygienic and ecological risks related to subsequent land application. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5386-5391.
35. Walczak J.J., Xu S. Manure as a source of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli and enterococci: a case study of a Wisconsin, USA Family Dairy Farm. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2011, 219:579-589.
36. Walsh J.J., Rousk J., Edwards-Jones G., Jones D.L., Prysor Williams A. Fungal and bacterial growth following the application of slurry and anaerobic digestate of livestock manure to temperate pasture soils. Biol. Fert. Soils 2012, 48:889-897.