Bridging conceptions of quality in moments of qualitative research

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 436-456

  Ravenek, Michael John ^a   Rudman, Debbie Laliberte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment; Bridging; Criteria; Evaluation; Moments; Qualitative; Quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890876340     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16094069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/160940691301200122     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ballinger, C. (2006). Demonstrating rigour and quality? In L. Finlay & C. Ballinger (Eds.), Qualitative research for allied health professionals: Challenging choices (pp. 235-246). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Cheek, J. (2008). Beyond the "how to": The importance of thinking about, not simply doing, qualitative research. In K. Nielsen, S. Brinkmann, C. Elmholdt, L. Tanggaard, P. Museaus, & G. Kraft (Eds.), A qualitative stance (pp. 203-214). Arhus, Denmark: Arhus.
3. Collingridge, D. S., & Gantt, E. E. (2008). The quality of qualitative research. American Journal of Medical Quality, 23(5), 389-395.
4. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Delamont, S., Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (2000). The twilight years? Educational ethnography and the five moments model. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(3), 223-238.
6. Denzin, N. K. (2008). The new paradigm dialogs and qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(4), 315-325.
7. Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 139-160.
8. Denzin, N. K. (2011). The politics of evidence. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 645-658). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (2009). Introduction. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and social justice: Towards a politics of hope (pp. 11-50). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 1-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Dingwall, R., Murphy, E., Watson, P., Greatbatch, D., & Parker, S. (1998). Catching goldfish: Quality in qualitative research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 3(3), 167-172.
13. Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215-229.
14. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 274-294.
16. Holt, N. L. (2003). Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 18-28.
17. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
18. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673-693.
20. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275-289.
21. Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2005). The eight and ninth moments-Qualitative research in/and the fractured future. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1115-1126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2003). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 253-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emeging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 99-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250-260.
26. Morse, J. M. (1999). Myth #93: Reliability and validity are not relevant to qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 717-718.
27. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22.
28. Palmer, P. J. (1987). Community, conflict, and ways of knowing: Ways to deepen our educational agenda. Change, 19(5), 20-25.
29. Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126-136.
30. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Rolfe, G. (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 304-310.
32. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2002). Reading qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(1), 74-108.
33. Schwandt, T. A. (1996). Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(1), 58-72.
34. Seale, C. (1999a). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 465-478.
35. Seale, C. (1999b). The quality of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Seale, C. (2002). Quality issues in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 1(1), 97-110.
37. Smith, J. K., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Relativism, criteria, and politics. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 915-932). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Sparkes, A. C. (2002). Telling tales in sport and physical activity: A qualitative journey. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
39. Thorne, S., & Darbyshire, P. (2005). Land mines in the field: A modest proposal for improving the craft of qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 15(8), 1105-1113.
40. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight "big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.
41. Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522-537.