Mechanism for the catastrophe-promoting activity of the microtubule destabilizer Op18/stathmin

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 51, 2013, Pages 20449-20454

  Gupta, Kamlesh K ^a   Li, Chunlei ^a   Duan, Aranda ^a   Alberico, Emily O ^a   Kim, Oleg V ^a   Alber, Mark S ^a   Goodson, Holly V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; GMPCPP; T2S complex; Zn sheets

Indexed keywords

DOLASTATIN 10; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; OP18 PROTEIN; POLYMER; STATHMIN; TUBULIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPOLYMERIZATION; HYPOTHESIS; MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 84890845323     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309958110     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Murphy ME, Cassimeris L (2006) A novel cancer therapy approach targeting microtubule function. Cancer Biol Ther 5(12):1721-1723.
2. Rana S, Maples PB, Senzer N, Nemunaitis J (2008) Stathmin 1: A novel therapeutic target for anticancer activity. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8(9):1461-1470.
3. Steinmetz MO (2007) Structure and thermodynamics of the tubulin-Stathmin interaction. J Struct Biol 158(2):137-147.
4. Cassimeris L (2002) The oncoprotein 18/stathmin family of microtubule destabilizers. Curr Opin Cell Biol 14(1):18-24.
5. Belmont LD, Mitchison TJ (1996) Identification of a protein that interacts with tubulin dimers and increases the catastrophe rate of microtubules. Cell 84(4):623-631.
6. Howell B, Larsson N, Gullberg M, Cassimeris L (1999) Dissociation of the tubulinsequestering and microtubule catastrophe-Promoting activities of oncoprotein 18/stathmin. Mol Biol Cell 10(1):105-118.
7. Manna T, Thrower D, Miller HP, Curmi P, Wilson L (2006) Stathmin strongly increases the minus end catastrophe frequency and induces rapid treadmilling of bovine brain microtubules at steady state in vitro. J Biol Chem 281(4):2071-2078.
8. Amayed P, Pantaloni D, Carlier MF (2002) The effect of stathmin phosphorylation on microtubule assembly depends on tubulin critical concentration. J Biol Chem 277(25): 22718-22724.
9. Nogales E, Wang HW (2006) Structural intermediates in microtubule assembly and disassembly: How and why Curr Opin Cell Biol 18(2):179-184.
10. Margolin G, et al. (2012) The mechanisms of microtubule catastrophe and rescue: Implications from analysis of a dimer-Scale computational model. Mol Biol Cell 23(4): 642-656.
11. Gupta KK, et al. (2009) Minimal plus-End tracking unit of the cytoplasmic linker protein CLIP-170. J Biol Chem 284(11):6735-6742.
12. Arnal I, Wade RH (1995) How does taxol stabilize microtubules Curr Biol 5(8): 900-908.
13. Elie-Caille C, et al. (2007) Straight GDP-Tubulin protofilaments form in the presence of taxol. Curr Biol 17(20):1765-1770.
14. Müller-Reichert T, Chrétien D, Severin F, Hyman AA (1998) Structural changes at microtubule ends accompanying GTP hydrolysis: Information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue of GTP, guanylyl (alpha,beta) methylenediphosphonate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(7):3661-3666.
15. Moores CA, Milligan RA (2008) Visualisation of a kinesin-13 motor on microtubule end mimics. J Mol Biol 377(3):647-654.
16. Mulder AM, et al. (2009) A new model for binding of kinesin 13 to curved microtubule protofilaments. J Cell Biol 185(1):51-57.
17. Boukari H, Sackett DL, Schuck P, Nossal RJ (2007) Single-Walled tubulin ring polymers. Biopolymers 86(5-6):424-436.
18. Cormier A, Marchand M, Ravelli RB, Knossow M, Gigant B (2008) Structural insight into the inhibition of tubulin by vinca domain peptide ligands. EMBO Rep 9(11):1101-1106.
19. Kamimura S, Mandelkow E (1992) Tubulin protofilaments and kinesin-Dependent motility. J Cell Biol 118(4):865-875.
20. Kawachi A, et al. (2003) Different protofilament-Dependence of the microtubule binding between MAP2 and MAP4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 305(1):72-78.
21. Krouglova T, Amayed P, Engelborghs Y, Carlier MF (2003) Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy analysis of the dynamics of tubulin interaction with RB3, a stathmin family protein. FEBS Lett 546(2-3):365-368.
22. Carlier MF (2007) Measurements of stathmin-Tubulin interaction in solution. Methods Mol Med 137:103-110.
23. Gigant B, et al. (2000) The 4 A X-Ray structure of a tubulin:stathmin- Like domain complex. Cell 102(6):809-816.
24. Ravelli RB, et al. (2004) Insight into tubulin regulation from a complex with colchicine and a stathmin-Like domain. Nature 428(6979):198-202.
25. Nawrotek A, Knossow M, Gigant B (2011) The determinants that govern microtubule assembly from the atomic structure of GTP-Tubulin. J Mol Biol 412(1):35-42.
26. Barbier P, et al. (2010) Stathmin and interfacial microtubule inhibitors recognize a naturally curved conformation of tubulin dimers. J Biol Chem 285(41):31672-31681.
27. Wang C, Cormier A, Gigant B, Knossow M (2007) Insight into the GTPase activity of tubulin from complexes with stathmin-Like domains. Biochemistry 46(37):10595-10602.
28. Clément MJ, et al. (2005) N-Terminal stathmin-Like peptides bind tubulin and impede microtubule assembly. Biochemistry 44(44):14616-14625.
29. Gregoretti IV, Margolin G, Alber MS, Goodson HV (2006) Insights into cytoskeletal behavior from computational modeling of dynamic microtubules in a cell-Like environment. J Cell Sci 119(Pt 22):4781-4788.
30. Komarova YA, Vorobjev IA, Borisy GG (2002) Life cycle of MTs: Persistent growth in the cell interior, asymmetric transition frequencies and effects of the cell boundary. J Cell Sci 115(Pt 17):3527-3539.