Thinking about Health-Related Outcomes: What Do We Need Evidence about?

Clinical and Translational Science

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 286-291

  Glasgow, Russell E ^a   Brownson, Ross C ^b,c   Kessler, Rodger S ^d  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomarkers; Evaluation; Implementation; Measures; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; SAFETY;

BIOMARKERS; EVALUATION; IMPLEMENTATION; MEASURES; OUTCOMES;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);

EID: 84890844518     PISSN: 17528054     EISSN: 17528062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cts.12080     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 2011; 38(2): 65-76.
2. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Eng J Med 2003; 348(26): 2635-2645.
3. Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2000.
4. Kessler R. The patient centered medical home: an oppportunity to move past brilliant and irrelevant research and practice. Transl Behav Med 2012; 2: 311-312. doi:10.1007/s13142-012-0151-6.
5. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, eds. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. 1st edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
6. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health 2012; 102(7): 1274-1281.
7. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Committee on Quality Health Care in America; National Academies Press; 2003.
8. Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: to whom do the results of this trial apply? Lancet 2005; 365: 82-93.
9. Allen JD, Linnan LA, Emmons KM. Fidelity and its relationship to implementation effectiveness, adaptation, and dissemination. In: Brownson RC, Colditz G, Proctor E, eds. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp 281-304.
10. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2007; 2: 40.
11. Breitenstein SM, Gross D, Garvey CA, Hill C, Fogg L, Resnick B. Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Res Nurs Health 2010; 33(2): 164-173.
12. Rabin BA, Brownson RC. Developing the terminology for dissemination and implementation research in health. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, eds. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012; 23-54.
13. Aarons GA, Horotwitz JD, Dlugosz LR, Ehrhart MG. Role of organizational processes in dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz G, Proctor E, eds. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. 128-153.
14. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edn. New York: Free Press; 2003.
15. Sussman S, Valente TW, Rohrbach LA, Skara S, Pentz MA. Translation in the health professions: converting science to action. Eval Health Prof 2006; 29: 7-22.
16. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T, Gold L. Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58: 788-793.
17. Shediac-Ritzkallah MC, Bone LR. Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for resaerch, practice and policy. Health Educ Res 1998; 13(1): 87-108.
18. Scheirer MA, Dearing JW. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am J Public Health 2011; 101(11): 2059-2067.
19. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: a1655.
20. Faes MC, Reelick MF, Esselink RA, Rikkert MG. Developing and evaluating complex healthcare interventions in geriatrics: the use of the medical research council framework exemplified on a complex fall prevention intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58(11): 2212-2221.
21. Woolf SH. Potential health and economic consequences of misplaced priorities. JAMA 2007; 297(5): 523-526.
22. Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Benkeser RM, Peek CJ. What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model? Eval Health Prof 2012; 36(1): 44-46.
23. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Ann Rev Public Health 2007; 28: 413-433.
24. Kaplan RM, Ganiats TG. Qalys: their ethical implications. JAMA 1990; 264(19): 2502-2503.
25. Mackenbach JP. The persistence of health inequalities in modern welfare states: the explanation of a paradox. Soc Sci Med 2012; 75(4): 761-769.
26. Marmot M, Allen J, Bell R, Bloomer E, Goldblatt P. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet 2012; 380(9846): 1011-1029.
27. Chin MH, Clarke AR, Nocon RS, Casey AA, Goddu AP, Keesecker NM, Cook SC. A roadmap and best practices for organizations to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27(8): 992-1000.
28. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA 2012; 307(15): 1583-1584.
29. Crabtree BF, Nutting PA, Miller WL, Stange KC, Stewart EE, Jaen CR. Summary of the National Demonstration Project and recommendations for the patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med 2010; 8(Suppl 1): S80-S90.
30. Glasgow RE, Kaplan RM, Ockene JK, Fisher EB, Emmons KM. Patient-reported measures of psychosocial issues and health behavior should be added to electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31(3): 497-504.
31. Estabrooks PA, Boyle M, Emmons KM, Glasgow RE, Hesse BW, Kaplan RM, Krist AH, Moser RP, Taylor MV. Harmonized patient-reported data elements in the electronic health record: supporting meaningful use by primary care action on health behaviors and key psychosocial factors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19(4): 575-582.
32. Raue PJ, Schulberg HC, Heo M, Klimstra S, Bruce ML. Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome: a randomized primary care study. Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60(3): 337-343.
33. Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, Moser RP, Henton MD, Proctor EK, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE. Advancing the application, quality, and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci 2012 Dec 11; 7: 119.
34. Kaplan RM. Two pathways to prevention. Am Psychol 2000; 55(4): 382-396.
35. Shy CM. The failure of academic epidemiology: witness for the prosecution. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 145(6): 479-484.
36. Nathan DM, Singer DE, Hurxthal K, Goodson JD. The clinical information value of the glycosylated hemoglobin assay. N Engl J Med 1984; 310(6): 341-346.
37. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 1985; 14: 32-38.
38. Rose G. The Strategy of Preventive Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
39. McKinlay JB, Marceau LD. To boldly go.. Am J Public Health 2000; 90(1): 25-33.
40. Bloomgarden ZT. Diabetes treatment: the coming paradigm shift. J Diabetes 2012; 4(4): 315-317. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12005.
41. Genuth S, Ismail-Beigi F. Clinical implications of the ACCORD trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97(1): 41-48.
42. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996.
43. Mayo NE, Scott S. Evaluating a complex intervention with a single outcome may not be a good idea: an example from a randomised trial of stroke case management. Age Ageing 2011; 40(6): 718-724.
44. Carle AC, Cella D, Cai L, Choi SW, Crane PK, Curtis SM, Gruhl J, Lai JS, Mukherjee S, Reise SP, Teresi JA, Thissen D, Wu EJ, Hays RD. Advancing PROMIS's methodology: results of the Third Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Psychometric Summit. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011; 11(6): 677-684.