Advancing PROMIS's methodology: Results of the Third Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS ®) Psychometric Summit

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 677-684

  Carle, Adam C ^a   Cella, David ^b   Cai, Li ^c   Choi, Seung W ^b   Crane, Paul K ^d   Curtis, S McKay ^d   Gruhl, Jonathan ^d   Lai, Jin Shei ^b   Mukherjee, Shubhabrata ^d   Reise, Steven P ^c   Teresi, Jeanne A ^e   Thissen, David ^f   Wu, Eric J ^c   Hays, Ron D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

computerized adaptive testing; dimensionality; factor analysis; item response theory; patient reported outcomes; PROMIS; psychometrics; structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; SELF REPORT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 81755162960     PISSN: 14737167     EISSN: 17448379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/erp.11.74     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care 45(5 Suppl. 1), S3 (2007).
2. Hambleton RK. Item Response Theory. Kluwer, MA, USA (1985).
3. Van Der Linden W, Glas C. Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Springer Netherlands, The Netherlands (2000).
4. Reeve BB. Item response theory modeling in health outcomes measurement. Expert Rev. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 3(2), 131-145 (2003).
5. Holland P. A framework and history for score linking. In: Linking and Aligning Scores and Scales. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences Part I, Springer, NY, USA, 5-30 (2007).
6. Thissen D, Varni J, Stucky B, Liu Y, Irwin D, Dewalt D. Using the PedsQL™ 3.0 athma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS). Qual. Life Res. 20(9), 1497-1505 (2011).
7. Cai L. A two-tier full-information item factor analysis model with applications. Psychometrika 75(75), 581-612 (2010).
8. Bock R, Aitkin M. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika 46(4), 443-459 (1981).
9. Muthén B. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49(1), 115-132 (1984).
10. Stocking ML, Lord FM. Developing a common metric in item response theory. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 7(2), 201 (1983).
11. Kolen M, Brennan R. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2004).
12. Teresi JA, Stewart AL, Morales LS, Stahl SM. Measurement in a multi-ethnic society. Overview to the special issue. Med. Care 44(11 Suppl. 3), S3-S4 (2006).
13. Teresi JA, Ocepek-Welikson K, Kleinman M et al. Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS): an item response theory approach. Psychol. Sci. Q 51(2), 148 (2009).
14. Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala BB, Bruce B. Improved responsiveness of physical function (disability) scales based upon item response theory. Arthritis Rheum. 60(Suppl.), S229 (2009).
15. Jöreskog KG, Goldberger AS. Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 70(351), 631-639 (1975).
16. Carle A. Mitigating systematic measurement error in comparative effectiveness research in heterogeneous populations. Med. Care 48(6), S68 (2010).
17. Crane PK, Gibbons LE, Jolley L, Van Belle G. Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar. Med. Care 44(11 Suppl. 3), S115-S123 (2006).
18. Reise S, Moore T, Haviland M. Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. J. Pers. Assess. 92(6), 544-559 (2010).
19. Reise S, Morizot J, Hays R. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Qual. Life Res. 16, 19-31 (2007).
20. Cai L, Du Toit SHC, Thissen D. IRTPRO: Flexible, Multidimensional, Multiple Categorical IRT Modeling. Scientific Software International, IL, USA.
21. Ferguson T. A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Ann. Stat. 1(2), 209-230 (1973).
22. Lunn D, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS - a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput. 10(4), 325-337 (2000).
23. Fox J, Glas C. Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using Gibbs sampling. Psychometrika 66(2), 271-288 (2001).
24. Reckase M. Multidimensional Item Response Theory. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2009).
25. Gibbons R, Hedeker D. Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika 57(3), 423-436 (1992).
26. Wainer H, Bradlow E, Wang X. Testlet Response Theory and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007).
27. Schilling S, Bock RD. High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature. Psychometrika 70(3), 533-555 (2005).
28. Cai L. High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm. Psychometrika 75(1), 33-57 (2010).
29. Cai L. Metropolis-Hastings Robbins- Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 35(3), 307 (2010).
30. Thissen D, Steinberg L, Wainer H. Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In: Differential Item Functioning. Holland PW (Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, USA, 67-113 (1993).