Is transcranial direct current stimulation a potential method for improving response inhibition?

Neural Regeneration Research

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1048-1054

  Kwon, Yong Hyun ^a   Kwon, Jung Won ^b  

^a Yeungnam College of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^b Daegu University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Behavioral modification; Grants supported paper; Inhibitory control; Motor learning; Neural regeneration; Neuroregeneration; Neurorehabilitation; Pre supplementary motor area; Response inhibition; Stop signal task; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRICAL STIMULUS TEST; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT INHIBITION; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; NERVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TEMPORAL CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890828265     PISSN: 16735374     EISSN: 18767958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Cai W, Oldenkamp CL, Aron AR. A proactive mechanism for selective suppression of response tendencies. J Neurosci. 2011;31:5965-5969.
2. Claffey MP, Sheldon S, Stinear CM, et al. Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48: 541-548.
3. Goghari VM, MacDonald AW 3rd. The neural basis of cognitive control: response selection and inhibition. Brain Cogn. 2009;71:72-83.
4. Aron AR, Durston S, Eagle DM, et al. Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition. J Neurosci. 2007;27(44): 11860-11864.
5. Aron AR, Poldrack RA. Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci. 2006;26(9):2424-2433.
6. Zandbelt BB, Vink M. On the role of the striatum in response inhibition. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13848.
7. Li CS, Huang C, Constable RT, et al. Imaging response inhibition in a stop-signal task: neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post-response processing. J Neurosci. 2006;26:186-192.
8. Chao HH, Luo X, Chang JL, et al. Activation of the pre-supplementary motor area but not inferior prefrontal cortex in association with short stop signal reaction time--an intra-subject analysis. BMC Neurosci. 2009; 10:75.
9. Chen CY, Muggleton NG, Tzeng OJ, et al. Control of prepotent responses by the superior medial frontal cortex. Neuroimage. 2009;44(2):537-545.
10. Cai W, George JS, Verbruggen F, et al. The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108:380-389.
11. Jenkins IH, Jahanshahi M, Jueptner M, et al. Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. II. The effect of movement predictability on regional cerebral blood flow. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 6):1216-1228.
12. Toma K, Honda M, Hanakawa T, et al. Activities of the primary and supplementary motor areas increase in preparation and execution of voluntary muscle relaxation: an event-related fMRI study. J Neurosci. 1999;19: 3527-3534.
13. Aron AR, Behrens TE, Smith S, et al. Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. J Neurosci. 2007;27:3743-3752.
14. Folden D, Stuss DT. Inhibitory control is slowed in patients with right superior medial frontal damage. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18:1843-1849.
15. Nachev P, Wydell H, O'Neill K, et al. The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action. Neuroimage 2007;36 Suppl 2:T155-163.
16. Obeso I, Wilkinson L, Casabona E, et al. Deficits in inhibitory control and conflict resolution on cognitive and motor tasks in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 212:371-384.
17. Bissett PG, Logan GD. Balancing cognitive demands: control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011;37(2):392-404.
18. Verbruggen F, Logan GD. Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009;35(3):835-854.
19. Ko YT, Alsford T, Miller J. Inhibitory effects on response force in the stop-signal paradigm. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012;38:465-477.
20. Verbruggen F, Logan GD. Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;12(11): 418-424.
21. Verbruggen F, Logan GD. Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33:647-661.
22. Antal A, Polania R, Schmidt-Samoa C, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI. Neuroimage. 2011;55:590-596.
23. Jang SH, Ahn SH, Byun WM, et al. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cortical activation by motor task in the human brain: an fMRI study. Neurosci Lett. 2009;460:117-120.
24. Kwon YH, Jang SH. The enhanced cortical activation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation during hand movements. Neurosci Lett. 2011;492:105-108.
25. Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011;17:37-53.
26. Stagg CJ, Jayaram G, Pastor D, et al. Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49:800-804.
27. Reis J, Fritsch B. Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011;24:590-596.
28. Tabu H, Mima T, Aso T, et al. Functional relevance of pre-supplementary motor areas for the choice to stop during Stop signal task. Neurosci Res. 2011;70:277-284.
29. Neubert FX, Mars RB, Olivier E, et al. Modulation of short intra-cortical inhibition during action reprogramming. Exp Brain Res. 2011;211(2):265-276.
30. Zandbelt BB. Neurally constrained cognitive modeling clarifies how action plans are changed. J Neurosci. 2012;32:10449-10450.
31. Hsu TY, Tseng LY, Yu JX, et al. Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex. Neuroimage. 2011;56:2249-2257.
32. Verbruggen F, Logan GD. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009;35(5):1381-1388.
33. Chikazoe J, Jimura K, Hirose S, et al. Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task. J Neurosci. 2009;29: 15870-15877.
34. Greenhouse I, Oldenkamp CL, Aron AR. Stopping a response has global or nonglobal effects on the motor system depending on preparation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107:384-392.
35. Aron AR, Fletcher PC, Bullmore ET, et al. Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(2):115-116.
36. Chambers CD, Bellgrove MA, Gould IC, et al. Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98(6):3638-3647.
37. Alegre M, Lopez-Azcarate J, Obeso I, et al. The subthalamic nucleus is involved in successful inhibition in the stop-signal task: a local field potential study in Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. 2013;239:1-12.
38. Eagle DM, Baunez C, Hutcheson DM, et al. Stop-signal reaction-time task performance: role of prefrontal cortex and subthalamic nucleus. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18: 178-188.
39. Juan CH, Muggleton NG. Brain stimulation and inhibitory control. Brain Stimul. 2012;5:63-69.
40. Badry R, Mima T, Aso T, et al. Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1717-1723.
41. Zandbelt BB, Bloemendaal M, Hoogendam JM, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI reveal cortical and subcortical interactions during stop-signal response inhibition. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013;25(2):157-174.
42. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9: 97-113.
43. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48(3):206-208.
44. Verbruggen F, Logan GD, Stevens MA. STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40:479-483.
45. Mars RB, Klein MC, Neubert FX, et al. Short-latency influence of medial frontal cortex on primary motor cortex during action selection under conflict. J Neurosci. 2009;29: 6926-6931.
46. Moore JW, Ruge D, Wenke D, et al. Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: pre- supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency. Proc Biol Sci. 2010;277(1693):2503-2509.
47. Rushworth MF, Hadland KA, Paus T, et al. Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study. J Neurophysiol. 2002;87(5): 2577-2592.
48. Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, et al. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (transcranial direct current stimulation) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 114:2220-2222.