Left-hemisphere activation is associated with enhanced vocal pitch error detection in musicians with absolute pitch

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 97-108

  Behroozmand, Roozbeh ^a   Ibrahim, Nadine ^a   Korzyukov, Oleg ^a   Robin, Donald A ^b   Larson, Charles R ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Absolute pitch; Auditory feedback; Event related potentials (ERPs); Pitch processing; Relative pitch; Vocal motor control

Indexed keywords

ABSOLUTE PITCH; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; AUDITORY LATERALIZATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DULT; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACILITATION; HEARING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; LATENT PERIOD; LEFT HEMISPHERE ACTIVATION; MOTOR CONTROL; MUSICIAN; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PITCH; PITCH PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELATIVE PITCH; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SINGING; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VOCAL PITCH CONTROL; VOCAL PITCH ERROR DETECTION; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; VOICE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEREBRUM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MUSIC; PITCH PERCEPTION; VOICE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890813525     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Atienza M., Cantero J.L., Grau C., Gomez C., Dominguez-Marin E., Escera C. Effects of temporal encoding on auditory object formation: A mismatch negativity study. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 16(3):359-371.
2. Bass P., Jacobsen T., Schroger E. Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: Evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2008, 70(2):137-143.
3. Behroozmand R., Karvelis L., Liu H., Larson C.R. Vocalization-induced enhancement of the auditory cortex responsiveness during voice F0 feedback perturbation. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009, 120(7):1303-1312.
4. Behroozmand R., Larson C.R. Error-dependent modulation of speech-induced auditory suppression for pitch-shifted voice feedback. BMC Neuroscience 2011, 12:54.
5. Bendixen A., SanMiguel I., Schroger E. Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: A review. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2012, 83(2):120-131.
6. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 2001, 5(9):341-345.
7. Burkard R.F., Don M., Eggermont J.J. Auditory evoked potentials: Basic principles and clinical application 2006, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 1 ed.
8. Burnett T.A., Freedland M.B., Larson C.R., Hain T.C. Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998, 103(6):3153-3161.
9. Chang E.F., Niziolek C.A., Knight R.T., Nagarajan S.S., Houde J.F. Human cortical sensorimotor network underlying feedback control of vocal pitch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2013.
10. Chen S.H., Liu H., Xu Y., Larson C.R. Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2007, 121(2):1157-1163.
11. Donath T.M., Natke U., Kalveram K.T. Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002, 111(1):357-366.
12. Eliades S.J., Wang X. Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89(4):2194-2207.
13. Eliades S.J., Wang X. Dynamics of auditory-vocal interaction in monkey auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(10):1510-1523.
14. Eliades S.J., Wang X. Neural substrates of vocalization feedback monitoring in primate auditory cortex. Nature 2008, 453(7198):1102-1106.
15. Gaab N., Gaser C., Schlaug G. Improvement-related functional plasticity following pitch memory training. Neuroimage 2006, 31(1):255-263.
16. Gaab N., Gaser C., Zaehle T., Jancke L., Schlaug G. Functional anatomy of pitch memory - An fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling. Neuroimage 2003, 19(4):1417-1426.
17. Greenlee J.D., Behroozmand R., Larson C.R., Jackson A.W., Chen F., Hansen D.R., et al. Sensory-motor interactions for vocal pitch monitoring in non-primary human auditory cortex. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(4):e60783.
18. Guenther F.H. Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders 2006, 39(5):350-365.
19. Guenther F.H., Ghosh S.S., Tourville J.A. Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language 2006, 96:280-301.
20. Hackett T.A., Stepniewska I., Kaas J.H. Subdivisions of auditory cortex and ipsilateral cortical connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1998, 394(4):475-495.
21. Halwani G.F., Loui P., Ruber T., Schlaug G. Effects of practice and experience on the arcuate fasciculus: Comparing singers, instrumentalists, and non-musicians. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:156.
22. Hari R., Aittoniemi K., Jarvinen M.L., Katila T., Varpula T. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic-fields of the human-brain - Localization of neural generators. Experimental Brain Research 1980, 40(2):237-240.
23. Hawco C.S., Jones J.A., Ferretti T.R., Keough D. ERP correlates of online monitoring of auditory feedback during vocalization. Psychophysiology 2009, 46(6):1216-1225.
24. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Mathalon D.H., Gray M., Ford J.M. Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology 2005, 42(2):180-190.
25. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Nagarajan S.S., Houde J.F. Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production. NeuroReport 2006, 17(13):1375-1379.
26. Hickok G., Houde J., Rong F. Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: Computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 2011, 69(3):407-422.
27. Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S., Sekihara K., Merzenich M.M. Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14(8):1125-1138.
28. Jancke L., Langer N., Hanggi J. Diminished whole-brain but enhanced peri-sylvian connectivity in absolute pitch musicians. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 24(6):1447-1461.
29. Jones J.A., Munhall K.G. Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 108(3):1246-1251.
30. Kawahara H., Aikawa K. Contributions of auditory feedback frequency components on F0 fluctuations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996, 100. 2825A.
31. Knolle F., Schroger E., Baess P., Kotz S.A. The cerebellum generates motor-to-auditory predictions: ERP lesion evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 24(3):698-706.
32. Knolle F., Schroger E., Kotz S.A. Cerebellar contribution to the prediction of self-initiated sounds. Cortex 2013, 49(9):2449-2461.
33. Knolle F., Schroger E., Kotz S.A. Prediction errors in self- and externally-generated deviants. Biological Psychology 2013, 92(2):410-416.
34. Larson C.R., Altman K.W., Liu H., Hain T.C. Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F0 control. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 187(4):613-621.
35. Liu H., Behroozmand R., Bove M., Larson C.R. Laryngeal electromyographic responses to perturbations in voice pitch auditory feedback. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2011, 129(6):3946-3954.
36. Loui P., Li H.C., Hohmann A., Schlaug G. Enhanced cortical connectivity in absolute pitch musicians: A model for local hyperconnectivity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(4):1015-1026.
37. Loui P., Zamm A., Schlaug G. Enhanced functional networks in absolute pitch. Neuroimage 2012, 63(2):632-640.
38. Marie C., Magne C., Besson M. Musicians and the metric structure of words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(2):294-305.
39. Müller-Preuss P., Ploog D. Inhibition of auditory cortical neurons during phonation. Brain Research 1981, 215(1-2):61-76.
40. Naatanen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24(4):375-425.
41. Oostenveld R., Praamstra P. The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001, 112(4):713-719.
42. Pantev C., Elbert T., Ross B., Eulitz C., Terhardt E. Binaural fusion and the representation of virtual pitch in the human auditory cortex. Hearing Research 1996, 100(1-2):164-170.
43. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lutkenhoner B., Lehnertz K. Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: Pitch versus frequency representation. Science 1989, 246(4929):486-488.
44. Pantev C., Oostenveld R., Engelien A., Ross B., Roberts L.E., Hoke M. Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature 1998, 392(6678):811-814.
45. Parkinson A.L., Flagmeier S.G., Manes J.L., Larson C.R., Rogers B., Robin D.A. Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production. Neuroimage 2012, 61(1):314-322.
46. Patterson R.D., Uppenkamp S., Johnsrude I.S., Griffiths T.D. The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex. Neuron 2002, 36(4):767-776.
47. Rauschecker J.P. An expanded role for the dorsal auditory pathway in sensorimotor control and integration. Hearing Research 2011, 271(1-2):16-25.
48. Rauschecker J.P., Scott S.K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: Nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 2009, 12(6):718-724.
49. Schlaug G., Jancke L., Huang Y., Steinmetz H. In vivo evidence of structural brain asymmetry in musicians. Science 1995, 267(5198):699-701.
50. Shahin A.J. Neurophysiological influence of musical training on speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:126.
51. Shahin A., Bosnyak D.J., Trainor L.J., Roberts L.E. Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23(13):5545-5552.
52. Sperry R. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1950, 43:482-489.
53. Takeuchi A.H., Hulse S.H. Absolute pitch. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 113(2):345-361.
54. Tourville J.A., Reilly K.J., Guenther F.H. Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech. Neuroimage 2008, 39(3):1429-1443.
55. Tremblay K., Kraus N., McGee T., Ponton C., Otis B. Central auditory plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear and Hearing 2001, 22(2):79-90.
56. von Helmholtz H. Handbook of physiological optics 1867, Voss, Hamburg. 1 ed.
57. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269(5232):1880-1882.
58. Zarate J.M., Wood S., Zatorre R.J. Neural networks involved in voluntary and involuntary vocal pitch regulation in experienced singers. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:607-618.
59. Zarate J.M., Wood S., Zatorre R.J. Neural networks involved in voluntary and involuntary vocal pitch regulation in experienced singers. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(2):607-618.
60. Zarate J.M., Zatorre R.J. Neural substrates governing audiovocal integration for vocal pitch regulation in singing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2005, 1060:404-408.
61. Zarate J.M., Zatorre R.J. Experience-dependent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation during singing. Neuroimage 2008, 40(4):1871-1887.
62. Zatorre R.J., Belin P. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2001, 11(10):946-953.
63. Zatorre R., Belin P., Penhune V.B. Structure and function of auditory cortex: Music and Speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:37-46.
64. Zatorre R.J., Perry D.W., Beckett C.A., Westbury C.F., Evans A.C. Functional anatomy of musical processing in listeners with absolute pitch and relative pitch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95(6):3172-3177.