Pathological characteristics and prognostic effect of peritumoral capsule penetration in renal cell carcinoma after tumor enucleation

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 50.e15-50.e22

  Minervini, Andrea ^a   Rosaria Raspollini, Maria ^a   Tuccio, Agostino ^a   Di Cristofano, Claudio ^b   Siena, Giampaolo ^a   Salvi, Matteo ^a   Vittori, Gianni ^a   Sebastianelli, Arcangelo ^a   Lapini, Alberto ^a   Serni, Sergio ^a   Carini, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Capsular invasion; Partial nephrectomy; Peritumoral capsule; Prognosis; Renal cell carcinoma; Tumor enucleation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SPECIFIC SURVIVAL; CANCER SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY CAPSULE; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; LOCAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL; RECURRENCE RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TUMOR ENUCLEATION; TUMOR INVASION;

CAPSULAR INVASION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERITUMORAL CAPSULE; PROGNOSIS; RENAL CELL CARCINOMA; TUMOR ENUCLEATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRONS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890792845     PISSN: 10781439     EISSN: 18732496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ljungberg B., Cowan N.C., Hanbury D.C., et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 2010, 58:398-406.
2. Becker F., Siemer S., Humke U., et al. Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: long-term survival data of 216 patients. Eur Urol 2006, 49:308-313.
3. Minervini A., Di Cristofano C., Lapini A., et al. Histopathological analysis of peritumoral pseudocapsule and surgical margins status after tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2009, 55:1410-1418.
4. Kutikov A., VanArsdalen K.N., Gershman B., et al. Enucleation of renal cell carcinoma with ablation of the tumour base. BJU Int 2008, 102:688-691.
5. Minervini A., Serni S., Tuccio A., et al. Local recurrence after tumour enucleation for renal cell carcinoma with no ablation of the tumour bed: results of a prospective single-centre study. BJU Int 2011, 107:1394-1399.
6. Minervini A., Ficarra V., Rocco F., et al. Simple enucleation is equivalent to traditional partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: results of a nonrandomized, retrospective, comparative study. J Urol 2011, 185:1604-1610.
7. Minervini A., Serni S., Tuccio A., et al. Simple enucleation versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of pT1a and pT1b renal cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2012, 19:694-700.
8. Laryngakis N.A., Guzzo T.J. Tumor enucleation for small renal masses. Curr Opin Urol 2012, 22:365-371.
9. Patard J.J., Shvarts O., Lam J.S., et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 2004, 171:2181-2185.
10. Leibovich B.C., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C., et al. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2004, 171:1066-1070.
11. Mitchell R.E., Gilbert S.M., Murphy A.M., et al. Partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy offer similar cancer outcomes in renal cortical tumors 4 cm or larger. Urology 2006, 67:260-264.
12. Fergany A.F., Hafez K.S., Novick A.C. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year follow up. J Urol 2000, 163:442-445.
13. Krejci K.G., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C., et al. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic features predictive of patient outcome. Urology 2003, 62:641-646.
14. Pahernik S., Roos F., Wiesner C., et al. Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma in a solitary kidney. World J Urol 2007, 25:513-517.
15. Ghavamian R., Cheville J.C., Lohse C.M., et al. Renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney: an analysis of complications and outcome after nephron sparing surgery. J Urol 2002, 168:454-459.
16. Vermooten V. Indications for conservative surgery in certain renal tumors: a study based on the growth pattern of the clear cell carcinoma. J Urol 1950, 64:200.
17. Minervini A., Tuccio A., Lapini, et al. Review of the current status of tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2009, 81:65-71.
18. Li Q.-L., Guan H.-W., Zhang Q.-P., et al. Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less. Eur Urol 2003, 44:448-451.
19. Di Cristofano C., Minervini A., Tuccio A., et al. Pathological evaluation of peritumoral pseudocapsule status after nephron sparing surgery and its prognostic implication. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2009, 81:96-99.
20. Cho H.-J., Kim S.J., Ha U.-S., et al. Prognostic value of capsular invasion for localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2009, 56:1006-1012.
21. May M., Brookman-Amissah S., Roigas J., et al. Evaluation of renicapsular involvement in stages I and II renal cell carcinoma from the morphological and prognostic point of view. Urol Oncol 2010, 28:274-279.
22. Jeong I.G., Jeong C.W., Hong S.K., et al. Prognostic implication of capsular invasion without perinephric fat infiltration in localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2006, 67:709-712.
23. Klatte T., Chung J.S., Leppert J.T., et al. Prognostic relevance of capsular involvement and collecting system invasion in stage I and II renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2007, 99:821-824.
24. Rouach Y., Delongchamps N., Timsit M.-O., et al. Capsular involvement in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: an adverse pathological finding?. BJU Int 2010, 105:616-619.
25. Süer E., Ergün G., Baltaci S., et al. Does renal capsular invasion have any prognostic value in localized renal cell carcinoma?. J Urol 2008, 180:68-71.
26. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. UICC International Union Against Cancer 2009, Wiley-Blackwell. http://www.uicc.org/tnm, 7th ed. L.H. Sobin, M. Gospodariwicz, C. Wittekind (Eds.).
27. Fuhrman S.A., Lasky L.C., Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982, 6:655-663.
28. Lopez-Beltran A., Scarpelli M., Montironi R., et al. 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur Urol 2006, 49:798-805.
29. Rosenthal C.L., Kraft R., Zingg E.J. Organ-preserving surgery in renal cell carcinoma: tumor enucleation versus partial kidney resection. Eur Urol 1984, 10:222-228.
30. Evans H.L. Follicular neoplasms of the thyroid. A study of 44 cases followed for a minimum of 10 years, with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Cancer 1984, 54:535-540.