Pathological evaluation of peritumoral pseudocapsule status after nephron sparing surgery and its prognostic implication

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 96-99

  Di Cristofano, Claudio ^a   Minervini, Andrea ^b   Tuccio, Agostino ^b   Della Rocca, Carlo ^a   Minervini, Riccardo ^c   Carini, Marco ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Capsule; Enucleation; Nephron sparing surgery; Partial nephrectomy; Prognostic factor; Pseudocapsule; RCC; Surgical margins

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL INFILTRATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; HUMAN; KIDNEY CAPSULE; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY; PROGNOSIS; TUMOR CELL;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRONS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 68549136681     PISSN: 11243562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cahill GF. Cancer of kidneys, adrenal and testes. JAMA 1948; 138:357.
2. Beare JB and McDonald JR. Involvement of the renal capsule in surgically removed hyper-nephroma; a gross and histopathologic study. J Urol 1949; 61:857.
3. Vermooten V. Indications for conservative surgery in certain renal tumors: a study based on the growth pattern of the clear cell carcinoma. J Urol 1950; 64:200-208.
4. Minervini A, Di Cristofano C, Lapini A, et al. Histopathological analysis of peritumoral pseudocapsule and surgical margins status after tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2009; In press. Doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.038.
5. Minervini A, Serni S, Di Cristofano C, Carini M. Rebuttal from Authors re: Ficarra V, Galfano A and Cavalleri S. Is simple enucleation a minimal partila nephrectomy responding to the EAU guidelines' recommendations? Eur Urol 2009; In press. Doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.067.
6. Cho H-J, Kim S J, Ha U-S, et al. Prognostic value of capsular invasion for localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2009; In press. Doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.11.031.
7. May M, Brookman-Amissah S, Roigas J, et al. Evaluation of renicapsular involvement in stages I and II renal cell carcinoma from the morphological and prognostic point of view. Urol Oncol 2009; In press. Doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc. 2008.07.008.
8. Jeong IG, Jeong CW, Hong SK, Kwak C, Lee E, Lee SE. Prognostic implication of capsular invasion without perinephric fat infiltration in localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2006; 67:709-712
9. Klatte T, Chung JS, Leppert JT, et al. Prognostic relevane of capsular involvement and collecting system invasion in stage I and II renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2007; 99:821-824. (Pubitemid 46439583)
10. th Congr. Eur. Intrarenal. Surg. Soc. Trieste 1980.
11. Rosenthal CL, Kraft R, Zingg EJ: Organ-preserving surgery in renal cell carcinoma: Tumor enucleation versus partial kidney resection. European urology 1984; 10:222-228. (Pubitemid 14087759)
12. Marshall FF, Taxy JB, Fishman EK and Chang R. The feasibility of surgical enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1986; 135:231-234. (Pubitemid 16131345)
13. Blackley SK, Ladaga L, Woolfitt RA and Schellhammer PF. Ex situ study of the effectiveness of enucleation in patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1988; 140:6-10. (Pubitemid 18189097)
14. Evans HL: Follicular neoplasms of the thyroid. A study of 44 cases followed for a minimum of 10 years, with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Cancer 1984; 54:535-540.