Ex vivo MR volumetry of human brain hemispheres

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 364-374

  Kotrotsou, Aikaterini ^a   Bennett, David A ^b,c   Schneider, Julie A ^b,c   Dawe, Robert J ^a   Golak, Tom ^a   Leurgans, Sue E ^b,c   Yu, Lei ^b,c   Arfanakis, Konstantinos ^a,b,c  

^a Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

ex vivo; MRI; segmentation; volumetry

Indexed keywords

IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ACROSS TIME; BRAIN VOLUME; EX-VIVO; HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; VOLUME VARIATION; VOLUMETRIC MEASUREMENT; VOLUMETRY;

BRAIN;

AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN SIZE; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VIVO STUDY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; SIMULATION; VOLUMETRY;

EX VIVO; MRI; SEGMENTATION; VOLUMETRY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; AUTOPSY; BRAIN; CADAVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84890786256     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24661     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bronge L, Bogdanovic N, Wahlund L,. Postmortem MRI and histopathology of white matter changes in Alzheimer brains. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2002; 13: 205-212.
2. Seewann A, Kooi EJ, Roosendaal SD, Barkhof F, van der Valk P, Geurts JJ,. Translating pathology in multiple sclerosis: the combination of postmortem imaging, histopathology and clinical findings. Acta Neurol Scand 2009; 119: 349-355.
3. Bobinski M, de Leon MJ, Wegiel J, Desanti S, Convit A, Saint Louis LA, Rusinek H, Wisniewski HM,. The histological validation of post mortem magnetic resonance imaging-determined hippocampal volume in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience 2000; 95: 721-725.
4. Pfefferbraum A, Sullivan EV, Adalsteinsson E, Garric T, Harper C,. Postmortem MR imaging of formalin-fixed human brain. NeuroImage 2004; 21: 1585-1595.
5. Blamire AM, Rowe JG, Styles P, McDonald B,. Optimising imaging parameters for postmortem MR imaging of the human brain. Acta Radiol 1999; 40: 593-597.
6. Augustinack JC, Helmer K, Huber KE, Kakunoori S, Zollei L, Fischl B,. Direct Visualization of the perforant pathway in the human brain with ex-vivo diffusion tensor imaging. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010; 4: 42.
7. Gousias IS, Rueckert D, Heckemann RA, Dyet LE, Boardman JP, Edwards AD, Hammers A,. Automatic segmentation of brain MRIs of 2-year-olds into 83 regions of interest. NeuroImage 2008; 40: 672-684.
8. Heckemann RA, Hajnal JV, Aljabar P, Rueckert D, Hammers A,. Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. NeuroImage 2006; 33: 115-126.
9. Hammers A, Allom R, Koepp MJ, Free SL, Myers R, Lemieux L, Mitchell TN, Brooks DJ, Duncan JS,. Three-dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. Human Brain Mapping 2003; 19: 224-347.
10. Svarer C, Madsen K, Hasselbalch SG, Pinborg LH, Haugbøl S, Frøkjaer VG, Holm S, Paulson OB, Knudsen GM,. MR-based automatic delineation of volumes of interest in human brain PET images using probability maps. NeuroImage 2005; 24: 969-979.
11. Rohlfing T, Brandt R, Menzel R, Maurer Jr CR,. Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage 2004; 1: 1428-1442.
12. Heckemann RA, Hammers A, Aljabar P, Rueckert D, Hajnal JV,. The mirror method of assessing segmentation quality in atlas label propagation. In International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, IEEE, Boston, MA, 2009. pp 1194-1197.
13. Dawant B, Hartmann S, Thirion J, Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Demaerel P,. Automatic 3-D segmentation of internal structures of the head in MR images using a combination of similarity and free-form transformations. I. Methodology and validation on normal subjects. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1999; 18: 909-916.
14. Artaechevarria X, Munoz-Barrutia A, Ortiz-de-Solorzano C,. Combination strategies in multi-altas image segmentation: application to brain MR data. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2009; 28: 1266-1277.
15. Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Buchman AS, Barnes LL, Boyle PA, Wilson RS,. Overview and findings from the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Curr Alzheimer Res 2012; 9: 646-663.
16. Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Wilson RS,. Overview and findings from the Religious Orders Study. Curr Alzheimer Res 2012; 9: 628-645.
17. Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Bang W, Bennett DA,. Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia cases in community-dwelling older persons. Neurology 2007; 69: 2197-2204.
18. Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Arnold SE,. Education modifies the association of amyloid but not tangles with cognitive function. Neurology 2005; 65: 953-955.
19. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in human brain. Neuron 2002; 33: 341-355.
20. Jenkinson M, Smith SM,. A global optimization method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Imag Anal 2001; 5: 143-156.
21. Ardekani BA, Bachman AH, Strother SC, Fujibayashi Y, Yonekura Y,. Impact of inter-subject image registration on group analysis of fMRI data. International Congress Series 2004; 1265: 49-59.
22. Ardekani BA,. An improved method for intersubject registration in 3D volumetric brain MRI. In World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, IFMBE, Sydney, Australia, 2003. p. 452.
23. Kittler J, Hatef M, Duin RPW, Matas J,. On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1998; 20: 226-239.
24. Smith SM,. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 17: 143-155.
25. Cohen J,. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psycol Meas 1960; 20: 37-46.
26. Rohlfing T, Zahr NM, Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A,. The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure. Human Brain Mapping 2010; 31: 798-819.
27. Landis JR, Koch GG,. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.
28. Kruggel F, Turner J, Muftuler LT,; Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative. impact of scanner hardware and imaging protocol on image quality and compartment volume precision in the ADNI cohort. NeuroImage 2010; 49: 2123-2133.
29. Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 968-980.
30. Benveniste H, Blackband S,. MR microscopy and high resolution small animal MRI: applications in neuroscience research. Prog Neurobiol 2002; 67: 393-420.
31. Johnson GA, Benveniste H, Black RD, Hedlund LW, Maronpot RR, Smith BR,. Histology by magnetic resonance microscopy. Magn Reson Q 1993; 9: 1-30.
32. D'Arceuil HE, Westmoreland S, de Crespigny AJ,. An approach to high resolution diffusion tensor imaging in fixed primate brain. NeuroImage 2007; 35: 553-565.
33. Jacobs RE, Fraser SE,. Imaging neuronal development with magnetic resonance imaging (NMR) microscopy. J Neurosci Methods 1994; 54: 189-196.
34. Jovicich J, Czanner S, Han X, et al. MRI-derived measurements of human subcortical, ventricular and intracranial brain volumes: reliability effects of scan sessions, acquisition sequences, data analyses, scanner upgrade, scanner vendors and field strengths. NeuroImage 2009; 46: 177-192.
35. Han X, Jovicich J, Salat D, et al. Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer. NeuroImage 2006; 32: 180-194.
36. Cherbuin N, Anstey KJ, Réglade-Meslin C, Sachdev PS,. In vivo hippocampal measurement and memory: a comparison of manual tracing and automated segmentation in a large community-based sample. PLoS One 2009; 4: e5265.
37. Morey RA, Petty CM, Xu Y, Hayes JP, Wagner HR 2nd, Lewis DV, LaBar KS, Styner M, McCarthy G,. A comparison of automated segmentation and manual tracing for quantifying hippocampal and amygdala volumes. NeuroImage 2009; 45: 855-866.
38. Dewey J, Hana G, Russell T, et al. HIV Neuroimaging Consortium. Reliability and validity of MRI-based automated volumetry software relative to auto-assisted manual measurement of subcortical structures in HIV-infected patients from a multisite study. NeuroImage 2010; 51: 1334-1344.
39. Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA, et al. Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. NeuroImage 2009; 46: 786-802.
40. Dawe RJ, Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arfanakis K,. Neuropathologic correlates of hippocampal atrophy in the elderly: a clinical, pathologic, postmortem MRI study. PLoS One 2011; 6: e26286.
41. Pikkarainen M, Martikainen P, Alafuzoff I,. The effect of prolonged fixation time on immunohistochemical staining of common neurodegenerative disease markers. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2010; 69: 40-52.
42. Dwork AJ, Liu D, Kaufman MA, Prohovnik I,. Archival, formalin-fixed tissue: its use in the study of Alzheimer's type changes. Clin Neuropathol 1998; 17: 45-49.
43. Evers P, Uylings HB,. An optimal antigen retrieval method suitable for different antibodies on human brain tissue stored for several years in formaldehyde fixative. J Neurosci Methods 1997; 72: 197-207.