School diversity, school district fragmentation and metropolitan policy

Teachers College Record

Volumn 115, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Holme, Jennifer J ^a   Finnigan, Kara S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890764683     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Altshuler, A., Morrill, W., Wolman, H., & Mitchell, F. (Eds.). (1999). Governance and opportunity in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Committee on Improving the Future of US Cities Through Improved Metropolitan Governance, National Research Council.
2. Anderson, J. B. (2011). Durham County: A history of Durham County. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3. Bailey, C., & McMillin, Z. (2012, November 23). Talks about Shelby County municipal schools end; judge's ruling requested. TheCommercialAppeal Retrieved] from http://www.commercialappeal. com/news/2012/nov/23 talks-about-shelby-county-municipal-schools-end/
4. Bischoff, K. (2008). School district fragmentation and racial residential segregation: How do boundaries matter?. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 182-217.
5. Botkins, S. (2001). Public schools. In Kleber, J. E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Louisville. (pp.735- 737). Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
6. Briffault, R. (1996). The local government boundary problem in metropolitan America. Stanford Law Review, 48(5), 1115-1171.
7. Clotfelter, C. T. (2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Crane, J. B., White, D. T., Finnigan, K. S., & Hylton, N. D. (2012, July/August). Making collaborative decisions based on research. School Business Affairs, 13-15.
9. Davis, T., & Arsen, D. (2008). Building opportunity in low-wealth communities: State policies to fund school capital facilities. Lansing, MI: MSU Center for Community and Economic Development.
10. Delaware Department of Education and University of Delaware (2004, March). Delaware school district organization and boundaries: Closing the gap. Newark, DE: University of Delaware.
11. Diamond, P. R. (2000). Empowering families to vote with their feet. In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on regionalism (pp. 249-272). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
12. Diem, S. L. (2012). The relationship between policy design, context, and implementation in integration plans. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(22). Retrieved from http:// epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/958
13. Dillon, S. (2011, November 5). Merger of Memphis and County School Districts revives race and class challenges. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www. nytimes. com/2011/11/06/education merger-of-memphis-and-county-school-districts reviveschallenges.html?_r=1&emc=tnt&tntemail1=y
14. Drier, P., Mollenkopf, J., & Swanstrom, T. (2004). Place Matters [In-course packet]. Wichita, KS: University of Kansas Press.
15. Dries, B. (2012, January 19). Suburbs move forward on school districts. Memphis Daily News. Retrieved from http://www.memphisdailynews.com/news/2012/jan/19/ suburbs-move-forward-on-school-districts/
16. Duncan, G. J., & Zuberi, A. (2006). Mobility lessons from Gautreaux and moving to opportunity. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 1(1), 110-126.
17. Feuerstein, A. (2002). Elections, voting, and democracy in local school district governance. Educational Policy, 16(1), 15-36.
18. Filardo, M., Cheng, S., Allen, M., Bar, M., & Ulsoy, J. (2010, November). State capital spending on PK-12 facilities. Washington, DC: 21st Century School Fund.
19. Finnigan, K. S., & Scarbrough, J. B. (2013, February). Interdistrict choice and school diversity. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Sociology of Education Association, Asilomar, CA.
20. Fischel, W. A. (2010, February 4). The congruence of American school districts with other local government boundaries: A Google-Earth exploration. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Economics Working Paper.
21. Frankenberg, E. (2009). Splintering school districts: Understanding the link between segregation and fragmentation. Law and Social Inquiry, 34(4), 869-909.
22. Frug, G. (2002). Beyond regional government. Harvard Law Review, 115(7), 1763-1836. Hanushek, E., Kain, J., & Rivkin, J. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326-354.
23. Hanushek, E., Kain, J., & Rivkin, J. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326-354.
24. Harp, L. (1993, August 4). Measure to break up L.A. district dies in assembly committee. Education Week, Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/1993/08/04/40la. h12.html
25. Holme, J. J., Diem, S. L., & Mansfield, K. C. (2011). Regional coalitions and educational policy: Lessons from the Nebraska Learning Community Agreement. In E. Frankenberg & E. DeBray (Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
26. Holme, J. J., Finnigan, K. F., Orfield, M., Diem, S. L., Luce, T., & Hylton, N. (2012, April). Understanding regional educational policy: A comparative analysis of Omaha, Minneapolis, and Rochester's inter-district arrangements. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC.
27. Holme, J. J., & Wells, A. S. (2008). Beyond urban borders: How NCLB could provide meaningful choice to children in failing schools. In R. Kahlenberg (Ed.) A Century Foundation Edited Volume on the No Child Left Behind Act. New York: The Century Foundation.
28. Hoxby, C. M. (2002, April). School choice and school productivity (Or could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats?). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
29. Hui, T. (2012, February 7). New Dems on Wake school board push to modify assignment plan. The News Observer. Retrieved from http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/02/07/1837836/ new-dems-on-wake-school-board.html#storylink=cpy
30. Jackson, K. T. (1985). Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Judd, D. R., & Swanstrom, T. (2000). City politics: The political economy of urban America. New York: Longman Press.
32. McArdle, N., Osypuk, T., & Acevedo-Garcia, D. (2010). Segregation and exposure to highpoverty schools in large metropolitan areas: 2008-09. Retrieved from http://diversitydata. sph.harvard.edu/Publications/school_segregation_report.pdf
33. McMillin, Z. (2012, November 27). Judge Mays halts quest for municipal school districts. The Commercial Appeal. Retrieved from http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2012/ nov/27/judge-halts-quest-municipal-school-districts/
34. Mickelson, R., & Nkomo, N. (2012). Integrated schooling, life course outcomes, and social cohesion in multiethnic democratic societies. Review of Research in Education, 36, 197-238.
35. Miller, W. (2009). Interlocal agreements. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Public Policy Center.
36. National Academies (1999). Governance and opportunity in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Author.
37. Oliver, J. E. (2001). Democracy in suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. One Nation Indivisible. (2012). Interdistrict desegregation programs: A brief national overview. Cambridge, MA: Author.
39. Orfield, G. (1995). Metropolitan school desegregation: Impacts on metropolitan society. Minnesota Law Review, 80, 825-873.
40. Orfield, G. (2001) Metropolitan school desegregation: Impacts on metropolitan society. In J. Powell., G. Kearney, & V. Kay (Eds.), In pursuit of a dream deferred: linking housing and education policy. New York: Peter Lang.
41. Orfield, G. (2009). Reviving the goal of an integrated society: a 21st century challenge. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at UCLA.
42. Orfield, G., Eaton, S.E., & The Harvard Project on School Desegregation. (1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: The New Press.
43. Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Los Angeles: The UCLA Civil Rights Project.
44. Orfield, M. (2002). American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
45. Orr, L., Feins, J. D., Jacob, R., Beecroft, E, Sanbonmatsu, L., Katz, L. F., Liebman, J. B., & Kling, J. R. (2003). Moving to Opportunity interim impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
46. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1. 551 U.S. 701 (2007).
47. Powell, J. A. (2000). Addressing regional dilemmas for minority communities In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on regionalism (pp. 218-248). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
48. Powell, J. A. (2005). A new theory of integrated education: True integration. In J. C. Boger & G. Orfield (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (281-304). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
49. Raffel, J. A. (2003). After the court order: The changing faces of school desegregation in the Wilmington metropolitan area. Widener Law Symposium Journal, 9(1), 82-120.
50. Reynolds, L. (2003). Intergovernmental cooperation, metropolitan equity, and the new regionalism. Washington Law Review, 78, 93-160.
51. Richards, M. P., Stroub, K., & Holme, J. J. (2012) Can NCLB choice work? Modeling the effects of interdistrict choice on student access to higher-performing schools. In R. Kahlenberg (Ed.), The future of school integration. New York: Century Foundation Press.
52. Rusk, D. (1999). Inside game/outside game: Winning strategies for saving urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
53. Sanbonmatsu, L., Ludwig, J., Katz, L. F., Gennetian, L. A., Duncan, G. J., Kessler, R. C., Adam, E., McDade, T. W., Lindau, S. T. (2011). Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program: Final impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
54. Stephens, E. R., & Keane, W. G. (2005). The educational service agency: American education's invisible partner. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
55. Turner, M. A., Nichols, A., & Comey, J. (2012). Benefits of living in high opportunity neighborhoods: Insights from the Moving to Opportunity Demonstration. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
56. United States Civil Rights Commission. (1977). Statement on metropolitan school desegregation: A Report on the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Washington, DC: Author.
57. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). 2010 Census data products: United States, at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2010/glance/
58. Vigdor, J. L., Massey, D. S., & Rivlin, A. M. (2002). Does gentrification harm the poor? [with comments]. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 133-182.
59. Vogel, R. K., & Harrigan, J. J. (2007). Political change in the metropolis (8th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
60. Wake Education Partnership. (2006). A community united: Celebrating 30 years of courageous leadership. Raleigh, NC: Author.
61. Weiher, G. R. (1991). The fractured metropolis: Political fragmentation and metropolitan segregation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
62. Wells. A. S., Baldridge, B., Duran, J. Lofton, R., Roda, A., Warner, M., White, T., & Grzesikowski, C. (2009, July.) Why boundaries matter: A study of five separate and unequal Long Island school districts. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Center for Understanding Race and Education.
63. Yinger, J. (1995). Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.