A Neuroethological Perspective on the Perception of Vocal Communication Signals

The Handbook of Speech Perception

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 653-675

  Gentner, Timothy Q ^a   Ball, Gregory F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Nonhuman animal studies; Psychological processes; Signal perception; Vocal communication signals; Vocalization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890752328     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470757024.ch27     Document Type: Chapter

References (123)

1. Abramson, A. & Lisker, L. (1967). Discriminability along the voice continuum: Cross-language tests. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 569-73). Prague, Czech Republic.
2. Adret-Hausberger, M. & Jenkins, P. F. (1988). Complex organization of the warbling song in starlings. Behaviour, 107, 138-56.
3. Aubin, T., Jouventin, P., & Hildebrand, C. (2000). Penguins use the two-voice system to recognize each other. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 267, 1081-7.
4. Ball, G. F. & Hulse, S. H. (1998). Bird song. American Psychologist, 53, 37-58.
5. Beecher, M. D. (1991). Successes and failures of parent-offspring recognition in animals. In P. G. Hepper (ed.), Kin Recognition (pp. 94-124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E., & Burt, J. (1994). Song perception in the song sparrow: Birds classify by song type but not by singer. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1343-51.
7. Brainard, M. S. & Doupe, A. J. (2002). Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 31-40.
8. Bregman, A. S. (1990). The auditory scene. In Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Brenowitz, E. A. (1991). Altered perception of species-specific song by female birds after lesions of a forebrain nucleus. Science, 251, 303-5.
10. Brenowitz, E. A., Margoliash, D., & Nordeen, K. W. (1997). An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system. Journal of Neurobiology, 33, 495-500.
11. Brooks, R. J. & Falls, J. B. (1975). Individual recognition by song in white-throated sparrows. III: Song features used in individual recognition. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 53, 1749-61.
12. Brown, J. L. & Hunsperger, R. W. (1963). Neuroethology and the motivation of agonistic behavior. Animal Behavior, 11, 439-48.
13. Brown, S. D., Dooling, R. J., & O'Grady, K. (1988). Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). III: Contact calls. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 102, 236-47.
14. Burt, J. M., Lent, K. L., Beecher, M. D., & Brenowitz, E. A. (2000). Lesions of the anterior forebrain song control pathway in female canaries affect song perception in an operant task. Journal of Neurobiology, 42, 1-13.
15. Camhi, J. M. (1984). Neuroethology: Nerve Cells and the Natural Behavior of Animals. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
16. Catchpole, C. K. & Slater, P. J. B. (1995). Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations (1st edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Chaiken, M., Böhner, J., & Marler, P. (1993). Song acquisition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris: A comparison of the songs of live-tutored, tape-tutored, untutored, and wild-caught males. Animal Behaviour, 46, 1079-90.
18. Cherry, E. & Taylor, W. (1954). Some further experiments upon the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 554-9.
19. Chew, S. J., Mello, C., Nottebohm, F., Jarvis, E. D., & Vicario, D. S. (1995). Decrements in auditory responses to a repeated conspecific song are long-lasting and require two periods of protein synthesis in the songbird forebrain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 92, 3406-10.
20. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26-58.
21. Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Cynx, J. & Nottebohm, F. (1992). Role of gender, season, and familiarity in discrimination of conspecific song by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 89, 1368-71.
23. Dave, A. S. & Margoliash, D. (2000). Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning. Science, 290, 812-16.
24. Dave, A. S., Yu, A. C., & Margoliash, D. (1998). Behavioral state modulation of auditory activity in a vocal motor system. Science, 282, 2250-4.
25. Del Negro, C., Gahr, M., Leboucher, G., & Kreutzer, M. (1998). The selectivity of sexual responses to song displays: Effects of partial chemical lesion of the HVC in female canaries. Behavioural Brain Research, 96, 151-9.
26. Dooling, R. J., Brown, S. D., Klump, G. M., & Okanoya, K. (1992). Auditory perception of conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations in birds: Evidence for special processes. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 20-8.
27. Dooling, R. J., Leek, M. R., Gleich, O., & Dent, M. L. (2002). Auditory temporal resolution in birds: Discrimination of harmonic complexes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 748-59.
28. Dooling, R. J., Lohr, B., & Dent, M. L. (2000). Hearing in birds and reptiles. In R. J. Dooling, R. R. Fay, & A. N. Popper (eds.), Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles (pp. 308-59). New York: Springer.
29. Dooling, R. J., Park, T. J., Brown, S. D., & Okanoya, K. (1987). Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). II: Vocal signals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 367-81.
30. Doupe, A. J. & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). Birdsong and human speech: Common themes and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 567-31.
31. Eens, M., Pinxten, M., & Verheyen, R. F. (1989). Temporal and sequential organization of song bouts in the European starling. Ardea, 77, 75-86.
32. Eens, M., Pinxten, R., & Verheyen, R. F. (1991). Organization of song in the European starling: Species-specificity and individual differences. Belgian Journal of Zoology, 121, 257-78.
33. Emlen, S. T. (1972). An experimental analysis of the parameters of bird song eliciting species recognition. Behaviour, 41, 130-71.
34. Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Falls, J. B. (1982). Individual recognition by sound in birds. In D. E. Kroodsma & E. H. Miller (eds.), Acoustic Communication in Birds (pp. 237-78). New York: Academic Press.
36. Fay, R. R. (1988). Hearing in Vertebrates: A Psychophysics Databook. Winnetka, IL: Hill-Fay Associates.
37. Feng, A. S. & Ratnam, R. (2000). Neural basis of hearing in real-world situations. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 699-725.
38. Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.) (1995). The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Gentner, T. Q. & Hulse, S. H. (1998). Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Animal Behaviour, 56, 579-94.
40. Gentner, T. Q. & Hulse, S. H. (2000). Perceptual classification based on the component structure of song in European starlings. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 3369-81.
41. Gentner, T. Q. & Margoliash, D. (2003). Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects. Nature, 424, 669-74.
42. Gentner, T. Q., Hulse, S. H., Bentley, G. E., & Ball, G. F. (2000). Individual vocal recognition and the effect of partial lesions to HVc on discrimination, learning, and categorization of conspecific song in adult songbirds. Journal of Neurobiology, 42, 117-33.
43. Gentner, T. Q., Hulse, S. H., Duffy, D., & Ball, G. F. (2001). Response biases in auditory forebrain regions of female songbirds following exposure to sexually relevant variation in male song. Journal of Neurobiology, 46, 48-58.
44. Godard, R. (1991). Long-term memory for individual neighbors in a migratory songbird. Nature, 350, 228-9.
45. Grace, J. A., Amin, N., Singh, N. C., & Theunissen, F. E. (2003). Selectivity for conspecific song in the zebra finch auditory forebrain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 472-87.
46. Grasse, P. (ed.) (1956). L'Instinct dans le compartement des animaux et de l'homme. Paris: Masson.
47. Green, S. (1975). Variation of vocal pattern with social situation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata): A field study. In L. A. Rosenblum (ed.), Primate Behavior (pp. 1-102). New York: Academic Press.
48. Harnad, S. (1987). Categorical Perceptions: The Groundwork of Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Hausberger, M. (1997). Social influences on song acquisition and sharing in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). In C. Snowden & M. Hausberger (eds.), Social Influences on Vocal Development (pp. 128-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Hausberger, M. & Cousillas, H. (1995). Categorization in birdsong: From behavioural to neuronal responses. Behavioural Processes, 35, 83-91.
51. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-79.
52. Hiebert, S. M., Stoddard, P. K., & Arcese, P. (1989). Repertoire size, territory acquisition and reproductive success in the song sparrow. Animal Behaviour, 37, 266-73.
53. Hinde, R. A. (1970). Animal Behaviour (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
54. Hinde, R. A. (1982). Ethology: Its Nature and Relations with Other Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Holekamp, K. E., Boydston, E. E., Szkman, M., Graham, I., Nutt, K. J., Birch, S., & Piskiel, A. (1999). Vocal recognition in the spotted hyena and its possible implications regarding the evolution of intelligence. Animal Behaviour, 58, 383-95.
56. Hulse, S. H., MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., & Wisniewski, A. B. (1997). Auditory scene analysis by song birds: Stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 3-13.
57. Immelmann, K. & Beer, C. G. (1989). A Dictionary of Ethology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Jones, M. W., Errington, M. L., French, P. J., Fine, A., Bliss, T. V., Garel, S., Charnay, P., Bozon, B., Laroche, S., & Davis, S. (2001). A requirement for the immediate early gene Zif268 in the expression of late LTP and long-term memories. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 289-96.
59. Jouventin, P., Aubin, T., & Lengagne, T. (1999). Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: The acoustic system of individual recognition. Animal Behaviour, 57, 1175-83.
60. Kluender, K. R., Diehl, R. L., & Killeen, P. R. (1987). Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science, 237, 1195-7.
61. Klump, G. M. (2000). Sound localization in birds. In R. J. Dooling, R. R. Fay, & A. N. Popper (eds.), Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles (pp. 249-307). New York: Springer.
62. Klump, G. M. & Maier, E. H. (1989). Gap detection in the starling (Sturnus vulgaris). I: Psychophysical thresholds. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A 164, 531-8.
63. Krebs, J., Ashcroft, R., & Webber, M. (1978). Song repertoires and territory defense in the great tit. Nature, 271, 539-42.
64. Kroodsma, D. E. & Byers, B. E. (1991). The functions of bird song. American Zoologist, 31, 318-28.
65. Kuhl, P. K. (1989). On babies, birds, modules, and mechanisms: A comparative approach to acquisition of vocal communication. In R. J. Dooling & S. H. Hulse (eds.), The Comparative Psychology of Audition: Perceiving Complex Sounds (pp. 379-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Kuhl, P. K. & Miller, J. D. (1975). Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science, 190, 69-72.
67. Kuhl, P. K. & Miller, J. D. (1978). Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification function for synthetic VOT stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 905-17.
68. Le Prell, C. G. & Moody, D. B. (1997). Perceptual salience of acoustic features of Japanese monkey coo calls. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 261-74.
69. Le Prell, C. G. & Moody, D. B. (2000). Factors influencing the salience of temporal cues in the discrimination of synthetic Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata) coo calls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 261-73.
70. Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
71. Leppelsack, H. J. & Vogt, M. (1976). Response to auditory neurons in the forebrain of a song bird to stimulation with species-specific sounds. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 107, 263-74.
72. Levin, R. (1996). Song behavior and reproductive strategies in a duetting wren, Thryothorus nigricapillus. II: Playback studies. Animal Behaviour, 52, 1107-17.
73. Liberman, A. M. (1982). On finding that speech is special. American Psychologist, 37, 148-67.
74. Liberman, A. M. (1996). Speech: A Special Code. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
75. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-61.
76. Lind, H., Dabelsteen, T., & McGregor, P. K. (1997). Female great tits can identify mates by song. Animal Behaviour, 52, 667-71.
77. MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., Hulse, S. H., Gentner, T. Q., & White, W. (1998). Auditory scene analysis by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): Perceptual segregation of tone sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 3581-7.
78. Margoliash, D. (1983). Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow. Journal of Neuroscience, 3, 1039-57.
79. Margoliash, D. (1987). Neural plasticity in birdsong learning. In J. P. Rauschecker & P. Marler (eds.), Imprinting and Cortical Plasticity (pp. 23-54). New York: Plenum.
80. Margoliash, D. (2003). Offline learning and the role of autogenous speech: New suggestions from birdsong research. Speech Communication, 41, 165-78.
81. Margoliash, D. & Fortune, E. (1992). Temporal and harmonic combination-sensitive neurons in the zebra finch's HVc. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 4309-26.
82. Marler, P. R. (1970). Birdsong and speech development: Could there be parallels? American Scientist, 58, 669-73.
83. Marler, P. R. (1982). Avian and primate communication: The problem of natural categories. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 6, 87-94.
84. May, B., Moody, D. B., & Stebbins, W. C. (1988). The significant features of Japanese macaque coo sounds: A psychophysical study. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1432-44.
85. May, B., Moody, D. B., & Stebbins, W. C. (1989). Categorical perception of conspecific communication sounds by Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 837-47.
86. McComb, R., Moss, C. F., Sayialel, S., & Baker, L. (2000). Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1103-9.
87. Mello, C., Nottebohm, F., & Clayton, D. F. (1995). Repeated exposure to one song leads to a rapid and persistent decline in an immediate early gene's response to that song in zebra finch telencephalon. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 6919-25.
88. Mello, C., Vicario, D. S., & Clayton, D. F. (1992). Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 89, 6818-22.
89. Mullennix, J. W. & Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception. In R. J. Dooling & S. H. Hulse (eds.), The Comparative Psychology of Audition: Perceiving Complex Sounds (pp. 97-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Müller, C. M. & Leppelsack, H. J. (1985). Feature extraction and tonotopic organization in the avian forebrain. Experimental Brain Research, 59, 587-99.
91. Murphy, G. L. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Nelson, D. A. (1989). Song frequency as a cue for recognition of species and individuals in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 171-6.
93. Nelson, D. A. & Marler, P. (1989). Categorical perception of a natural stimulus continuum: birdsong. Science, 244, 976-8.
94. Nottebohm, F. (1975). Vocal behavior in birds. In D. S. Farner & J. R. King (eds.), Avian Biology, vol. 5 (pp. 287-332). New York: Academic Press.
95. Nottebohm, F. (1996). The King Solomon lectures in neuroethology: A white canary on Mount Acropolis. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A 179, 149-56.
96. Okanoya, K. & Dooling, R. J. (1990a). Song-syllable perception in song sparrows (melospiza melodia) and swamp sparrows (melospiza georgiana): An approach from animal psychophysics. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 221-4.
97. Okanoya, K. & Dooling, R. J. (1990b). Detection of gaps in noise by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata). Hearing Research, 50, 185-92.
98. O'Loghlen, A. L. & Beecher, M. D. (1997). Sexual preferences for mate song types in female song sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 53, 835-41.
99. Owren, M. J. & Casale, T. M. (1994). Variations in fundamental frequency peak position in Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) coo calls. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 291-7.
100. Peek, F. W. (1972). An experimental study of the territorial function of vocal and visual display in the male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Animal Behaviour, 20, 112-18.
101. Pereira, M. R. (1986). Maternal recognition of juvenile offspring coo vocalizations in Japanese macaques. Animal Behaviour, 34, 935-7.
102. Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow & Co.
103. Ribeiro, S., Cecchi, G. A., Magnasco, M. O., & Mello, C. (1998). Toward a song code: Evidence for a syllabic representation in the canary brain. Neuron, 21, 359-71.
104. Sayigh, L. S., Tyack, P. L., Wells, R. S., Solow, A. R., Scott, M. D., & Irvine, A. B. (1999). Individual recognition in wild bottlenose dolphins: A field test using playback experiments. Animal Behaviour, 57, 41-50.
105. Schmidt, M. F. & Konishi, M. (1998). Gating of auditory responses in the vocal control system of awake songbirds. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 513-18.
106. Searcy, W. A. & Andersson, M. (1986). Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 507-33.
107. Sen, K., Theunissen, F. E., & Doupe, A. J. (2001). Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 1445-58.
108. Sherman, P. W. (1988). The levels of analysis. Animal Behaviour, 36, 616-19.
109. Sinnott, J. M. (1980). Species-specific coding in bird song. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 494-7.
110. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
111. Stoddard, P. K. (1996). Vocal recognition of neighbors by territorial passerines. In D. E. Kroodsma & E. H. Miller (eds.), Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (pp. 356-74). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
112. Stoddard, P. K., Beecher, M. D., Loesche, P., & Campbell, S. E. (1992). Memory does not constrain individual recognition in a bird with song repertoires. Behaviour, 122, 274-87.
113. Stripling, R., Volman, S. F., & Clayton, D. F. (1997). Response modulation in the zebra finch neostriatum: Relationship to nuclear gene regulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 3883-93.
114. Theunissen, F. E. & Doupe, A. J. (1998). Temporal and spectral sensitivity of complex auditory neurons in the nucleus HVc of male zebra finches. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 3786-802.
115. Thorpe, W. H. (1961). The Biology of Vocal Communication and Expression in Birds. London: Cambridge University Press.
116. Tinbergen, N. (1951). The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
117. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410-33.
118. Trout, J. D. (2001). The biological basis of speech: What to infer from talking to the animals. Psychological Review, 108, 523-49.
119. von Uexküll, J. (1957[1934]). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In Claire H. Schiller (ed. and trans.), Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept, (pp. 5-80). New York: International Universities Press.
120. Weary, D. M. & Krebs, J. R. (1992). Great tits classify songs by individual voice characteristics. Animal Behaviour, 43, 283-7.
121. Wiley, R. H., Hatchwell, B. J., & Davies, N. B. (1991). Recognition of individual male song by female dunnocks: a mechanism increasing the number of copulatory partners and reproductive success. Ethology, 88, 145-53.
122. Yu, A. & Margoliash, D. (1996). Temporal hierarchical control of singing in birds. Science, 273, 1871-5.
123. Zoloth, S. R., Peterson, M. R., Beecher, M. D., Green, S. G., Marler, P., Moody, D. B., & Stebbins, W. C. (1979). Species-specific perceptual processing of vocal sounds by monkeys. Science, 204, 870-3.