Short report: Limited effectiveness of screening mammography in addition to clinical breast examination by trained nurse midwives in rural Jakarta, Indonesia

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 134, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1250-1255

  Kardinah, D ^a   Anderson, Benjamin O ^b,c   Duggan, Catherine ^b   Ali, Ibrahim A ^b   Thomas, David B ^b  

^a Dharmais Cancer Hospital National Cancer Center   (Indonesia)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; clinic breast examinations (CBE); low to middle income countries; mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INDONESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE MIDWIFE; NURSE TRAINING; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RURAL AREA; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

BREAST CANCER; CLINIC BREAST EXAMINATIONS (CBE); LOW-TO-MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES; MAMMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDONESIA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE MIDWIVES; PALPATION;

EID: 84890564514     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28442     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al,. GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. Section of Cancer Information (30/11/2012), vol. 2012 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed on day/month/year. 2008.
2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals Int Med 2009; 151: 716-26, W-236.
3. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, et al,. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention 2010; 19: 1893-907.
4. Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, et al,. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 730-56.
5. Corbex M, Burton R, Sancho-Garnier H,. Breast cancer early detection methods for low and middle income countries, a review of the evidence. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2012; 21: 428-34.
6. Anderson BO, Jakesz R,. Breast cancer issues in developing countries: an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative. World J Surg 2008; 32: 2578-85.
7. Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ,. Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1490-9.
8. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Breast Cancer Screening. International Agency for Research on Cancer and the World Health Organization, 2002.
9. Pisani P, Parkin DM, Ngelangel C, et al,. Outcome of screening by clinical examination of the breast in a trial in the Philippines. Int J Cancer. Journal international du cancer 2006; 118: 149-54.
10. Mittra I, Mishra GA, Singh S, et al,. A cluster randomized, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India: methodology and interim results after three rounds of screening. Int J Cancer. Journal international du cancer 2010; 126: 976-84.
11. Miller AB,. Practical applications for clinical breast examination (CBE) and breast self-examination (BSE) in screening and early detection of breast cancer. Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) 2008; 3: 17-20.
12. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2011. Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All. In: Programme UND, ed. 1 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA, 2011.
13. Ng CH, Bhoo Pathy N, et al,. Comparison of breast cancer in Indonesia and Malaysia-a clinico-pathological study between Dharmais Cancer Centre Jakarta and University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 2011; 12: 2943-6.
14. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, UN World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision. United Nations: New York, 2009.
15. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS Atlas)ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
16. Barlow WE, Chi C, Carney PA, et al,. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 1840-50.
17. Ichikawa LE, Barlow WE, Anderson ML, et al,. Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004. Radiology 2010; 256: 74-82.
18. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M,. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 2006: CD001877.
19. Albert US, Schulz KD,. Clinical breast examination: what can be recommended for its use to detect breast cancer in countries with limited resources? Breast J 2003; 9 (Suppl 2): S90-S93.
20. Baines CJ,. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a perspective on criticisms. Ann Int Med 1994 120: 326-34.
21. Baines CJ, Miller AB, Bassett AA,. Physical examination. Its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer Causes Control: CCC 1989; 63: 1816-22.
22. Boulos S, Gadallah M, Neguib S, et al,. Breast screening in the emerging world: high prevalence of breast cancer in Cairo. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2005; 14: 340-6.
23. Wildeman MA, Fles R, Herdini C, et al,. Primary treatment results of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. PloS One 2013; 8: e63706.