Comparison of blood flow velocity quantification by 4D flow mr imaging with ultrasound at the carotid bifurcation

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1407-1413

  Harloff, A ^a   Zech, T ^a   Wegent, F ^a   Strecker, C ^a   Weiller, C ^a   Markl, M ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERIES; CAROTID ARTERY, COMMON; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CAROTID STENOSIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIASTOLE; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART RATE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OXYGEN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STENTS; SYSTOLE;

EID: 84880829556     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3419     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, et al. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology 2004;63:457-60.
2. Menke J. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in severe carotid stenosis: meta-analysis with metaregression of different techniques. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2204-16.
3. Nonent M, Serfaty JM, Nighoghossian N, et al Concordance rate differences of 3 noninvasive imaging techniques to measure carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice: results of theCARMEDASmulticenter study. Stroke 2004;35:682-86.
4. von Reutern GM, Goertler MW, Bornstein NM, et al on behalf of the Neurosonology Research Group of the World Federation of Neurology. Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods. Stroke 2012;43:916-21.
5. Gwilliam MN, Hoggard N, Capener D, et al. MR derived volumetric flow rate waveforms at locations within thecommoncarotid, internal carotid, and basilar arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009;29: 1975-82.
6. Bokkers RP, van der Worp HB, Mali WP, et al. Noninvasive MR imaging of cerebral perfusion in patients with a carotid artery stenosis. Neurology 2009;73:869-75.
7. Hollnagel DI, Summers PE, Poulikakos D, et al. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phasecontrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. NMR Biomed 2009;22:795-808.
8. Frydrychowicz A, François CJ, Turski PA. Four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography: potential clinical applications. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:24-35.
9. Markl M, Kilner PJ, Ebbers T. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:7.
10. Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P, et al. Normal and altered threedimensional portal venous hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis. Radiology 2012;262:862-73.
11. Harloff A, Albrecht F, Spreer J, et al. 3D blood flow characteristics in the carotid artery bifurcation assessed by flow-sensitive 4D MRI at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:65-74.
12. Markl M, Wegent F, Zech T, et al. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery: effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalization therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:647-55.
13. Wetzel S, Meckel S, Frydrychowicz A, et al. In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28: 433-38.
14. Bock J, Kreher BW, Hennig J, et al. Optimized pre-processing of time-resolved2Dand3Dphase contrastMRIdata. Paper previously presented at: Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 2007; Berlin, Germany. p 3138.
15. Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Stalder AF, et al. 4D phase contrast MRI at 3T: effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PCMRA and blood flow visualization. Magn Reson Med 2010;63: 330-38.
16. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, et al. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1218-31.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-10.
18. Markl M, Wallis W, Strecker C, et al. Analysis of pulse wave velocity in the thoracic aorta by flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI: reproducibility and correlation with characteristics in patients with aortic atherosclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:1162-68.
19. Chang W, Landgraf B, Johnson KM, et al. Velocity measurements in the middle cerebral arteries of healthy volunteers using 3D radial phase-contrast HYPRFlow: Comparison with transcranial Doppler sonography and 2D phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:54-59.
20. Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A. Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:988-94.
21. Tsao J, Kozerke S. MRI temporal acceleration techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:543-60.
22. Johnson KM, Lum DP, Turski PA, et al. Improved 3D phase contrast MRIwith off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1329-36.