From bench-top to chair-side: How scientific evidence is incorporated into clinical practice

Dental Materials

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-15

  Tracy, Sharon L ^a  

^a AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical practice guidelines; Clinical recommendations; Critical appraisal; Dental materials research; Dissemination; Evidence based dentistry; Implementation; Systematic reviews; Translational research

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES; CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS; CRITICAL APPRAISAL; DISSEMINATION; EVIDENCE-BASED; IMPLEMENTATION; MATERIALS RESEARCH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTISTRY;

RESEARCH;

DENTAL PROCEDURE; EVIDENCE BASED DENTISTRY; HUMAN; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY; HUMANS; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84890556772     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.200     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Z.S. Morris, S. Wooding, and J. Grant The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research J R Soc Med 104 2011 510 520
2. E.A. Balas, and S.A. Boren Yearbook of medical informatics: managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement 2000 Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Stuttgart, Germany
3. J. Grant, L. Green, and B. Mason Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science Res Eval 12 2003 217 224
4. K. Wratschko Empirical setting: the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Orientation and Alliance Portfolio Configuration 2009 Springer New York, NY
5. FDA Innovation/stagnation: challenge and opportunity on the critical path to new medical products 2004 Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/ SpecialTopics/CriticalPathInitiative/CriticalPathOpportunitiesReports/ucm077262. htm [accessed 26.07.13].
6. FDA FDA's critical path initiative. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/CriticalPathInitiative/ucm076689.htm [accessed on 02.08.13].
7. W. Trochim, C. Kane, M.J. Graham, and H.A. Pincus Evaluating translational research: a process marker model Clin Trans Sci 4 2011 153 162
8. D. Dougherty, and P.H. Conway The "3 T's" road map to transform US health care JAMA 299 19 2008 2319 2321
9. M.J. Khoury, M. Gwinn, P.W. Yoon, N. Dowling, C.A. Moore, and L. Bradley The continuum of translation research to genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention? Genet Med 9 10 2007 665 674
10. N.S. Sung, W.F. Crowley Jr., M. Genel, P. Salber, L. Sandy, and L.M. Sherwood Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise JAMA 289 10 2003 1278 1287
11. J.M. Westfall, J. Mold, and L. Fagnan Practice-based research - "Blue Highways" on the NIH Roadmap JAMA 297 4 2007 403 406
12. National Center for Research Resources Decision Making in T1 Translational Research: Final Workshop Report 2009 National Institutes of Health Available at http://dpcpsi.nih.gov/orip/documents/Decision-Making-in-T1- Translational-Research.pdf [accessed 10.05.13]
13. ADA, ANSI Standards, Technical Specifications & Technical Reports. Available at http://www.ada.org/830.aspx.
14. U.S. TAG for ISO/TC 106 Dentistry. Available at: http://www.ada.org/279. aspx.
15. ANSI/ADA Recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials 2005 Specification No. 41
16. ANSI/ADA/ISO Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 1. Evaluation and testing within a risk management process 2009 ANSI/ADA/ISO 10993-1:2009
17. FDA. Use of International Standard ISO-10993, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing' (Replaces #G87-1 #8294) (blue book memo). In: FDA, editor. Available at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm080735.htm; 1995.
18. FDA Regulatory Information - Guidances. Available at http://www.fda.gov/ RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm [accessed 02.08.13].
19. FDA Information Sheet Guidance For IRBs, Clinical investigators, and sponsors frequently asked questions about medical devices. 2006.
20. FDA Information Sheet Guidance For IRBs, Clinical investigators, and sponsors significant risk and nonsignificant risk medical device studies. 2006.
21. FDA. Device advice: comprehensive regulatory assistance. Available at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/default.htm.
22. FDA. Device approvals and clearances. Available at http://www.fda.gov/ MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/ default.htm.
23. CTSA consortium clinical & translational science awards. Available at https://www.ctsacentral.org/ [accessed 02.08.13].
24. SBIR/SBTR. Available at http://www.sbir.gov/# [accessed 02.08.13].
25. Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine - levels of evidence (March 2009). Available at http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025 [accessed 07.08.13].
26. B.J. Shea, J.M. Grimshaw, G.A. Wells, M. Boers, N. Andersson, and C. Hamel Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 7 2007 10
27. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
28. M. Borenstein, L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, and H.R. Rothstein Introduction to meta-analysis (statistics in practice) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. West Sussex, UK
29. J.P.T. Higgins, and S. Green Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 5.1.0 2011 Available at http://handbook.cochrane.org/ The Cochrane Collaboration; updated March 2011
30. G. Greenstein Clinical versus statistical significance as they relate to the efficacy of periodontal therapy J Am Dent Assoc 134 May 2003 583 591
31. G. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, E.A. Akl, R. Kunz, G. Vist, and J. Brozek GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 383 394
32. J.P.T. Higgins, D.G. Altman, J.A.C. Sterne, and Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies J.P.T. Higgins, S. Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 2011 Available at http://handbook.cochrane.org/ The Cochrane Collaboration; March 2011
33. Philipps B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al. Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine - levels of evidence. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/?O=1025: since 1998 [accessed 22.04.13].
34. University of South Australia. Critical appraisal tools. Available at http://www.unisa.edu.au/Research/Sansom-Institute-for-Health-Research/ Research-at-the-Sansom/Research-Concentrations/Allied-Health-Evidence/Resources/ CAT/ [accessed 10.05.13].
35. Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, et al. Assessing risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews 2012; AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC047-EF. Available at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/.
36. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Finding what works in Health Care: standards for systematic reviews 2011 The National Academies Press Washington, DC
37. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust 2011 The National Academies Press Washington, DC
38. R.M. Rosenfeld, R.N. Shiffman, and P. Robertson Clinical practice guideline development manual, 3rd ed.: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148 1 Suppl. 2013 S1 S55
39. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs Professionally applied topical fluoride: evidence-based clinical recommendations J Am Dent Assoc 117 8 2006 1151 1159
40. H. Balshem, M. Helfand, H.J. Schunemann, A.D. Oxman, R. Kunz, and J. Brozek GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 401 406
41. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, G.E. Vist, R. Kunz, Y. Falck-Ytter, and P. Alonso-Coello GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 336 2008 924 926
42. G.F. Sawaya, J. Guirguis-Blake, M. LeFevre, R. Harris, D. Petitti for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Update on the methods: estimating certainty and magnitude of net benefit Ann Intern Med 147 2007 871 875
43. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Grade Definitions. Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/grades.htm Current as of February 2013.
44. M. Brouwers, M.E. Kho, G.P. Browman, J.S. Burgers, F. Cluzeau, G. Feder for the AGREE Next Steps Consortium AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare Can Med Assoc J 182 2010 E839 E842 Available at http://www.agreetrust.org/
45. M.H. Ebell, J. Siwek, B.D. Weiss, S.H. Woolf, H. Susman, and B. Ewigman Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature Am Fam Physician 69 2004 548 556
46. M.G. Newman, R. Weyant, and P. Hujoel JEBDP improves grading system and adopts Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy Grading (SORT) for guidelines and systematic reviews J Evid Base Dent Pract 7 2007 147 150
47. S. West, V. King, T.S. Carey, K.N. Lohr, N. McKoy, and S.F. Sutton Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47 (prepared by the Research Triangle Institute - University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0011) 2002 April Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016
48. The GRADE Working Group. GRADEProfiler (GRADEPro). Available at: http://ims.cochrane.org/revman/gradepro.
49. ADA Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry ADA clinical recommendations handbook 2011 Available at: http://ebd.ada.org/contentdocs/FINAL-2011-Revised- ADA-Clinical-Recommendations-Handbook.pdf
50. J.A.C. Sterne, M. Egger, D. Moher, and Cochrane Bias Methods Group Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases J.P.T. Higgins, S. Green, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 2011 March Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org/ The Cochrane Collaboration
51. M. Egger, G.D. Smith, M. Schneider, and C. Minder Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 315 1997 629 634
52. U.S. Preventive services task force grade definitions. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/grades.htm [accessed 22.04.13]; May 2008.
53. ADA Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry ebd.ada.org.
54. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force U.S. preventive services task force procedure manual 2008 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ Publication No. 08-05118-EF, 95 pp.
55. C.M. Boyd, S. Singh, R. Varadhan, C.O. Weiss, R. Sharma, and E.B. Bass Methods for benefit and harm assessment in systematic reviews. Methods Research Report (prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under contract No. 290-2007-10061-I) 2012 November Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)-EHC150-EF
56. R. Chou, N. Aronson, D. Atkins, A.S. Ismaila, P. Santaguida, and D.H. Smith Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions 2008 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Rockville, MD Available at: http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ healthInfo.cfm?infotype=rr&ProcessID=60; posted November 2008
57. Y.K. Loke, D. Price, A. Herxheimer, and Cochrane Adverse Effects Methods Group Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach BMC Med Res Methodol 7 32. 2007
58. R.N. Aurora, and T.I. Morgenthaler On the goodness of recommendations: the changing face of practice parameters Sleep 33 10 2010 1273 1276
59. J. Andrews, G. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, K. Pottie, J.J. Meerpohl, and P.A. Coello GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations J Clin Epidemiol 66 7 2013 726 735
60. NGC/NQMC Editorial Board, Hermann RC, Shekelle PG, et al. Promoting transparent and actionable clinical practice guidelines: Viewpoint from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse/National Guideline Clearinghouse (NQMC/NGC) Editorial Board. Available at: http://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/ expert/expert-commentary.aspx?id=24555 [accessed 10.05.13] 2010.
61. R.N. Shiffman, G. Michel, R.M. Rosenfeld, and C. Davidson Building better guidelines with BRIDGE-Wiz: development and evaluation of a software assistant to promote clarity, transparency, and implementability J Am Med Inform Assoc 19 1 2012 94 101
62. J. Beauchamp, P.W. Caufield, J.J. Crall, K. Donly, R. Feigal, and B. Gooch Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs J Am Dent Assoc 139 3 2008 257 268
63. M. Tellez, S.L. Gray, S. Gray, S. Lim, and A.I. Ismail Sealants and dental caries: Dentists' perspectives on evidence-based recommendations J Am Dent Assoc 142 9 2011 1033 1040
64. J.A. O'Donnell, A. Modesto, M. Oakley, D.E. Polk, B. Valappil, and H. Spallek Sealants and dental caries: insight into dentists' behaviors regarding implementation of clinical practice recommendations J Am Dent Assoc 144 4 2013 e24 e30
65. R.B. Haynes, K.A. McKibbon, N.L. Wilczynski, S.D. Walter, and S.R. Werre Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey BMJ 2005 (May 13 [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 15894554)
66. R.B. Haynes, N.L. Wilczynski, and Team. for the Hedges Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from MEDLINE: analytical survey BMJ 328 7447 2004 1040
67. K.G. Shojania, and L.A. Bero Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy Eff Clin Pract 4 4 2001 157 162
68. AGREE Next Steps Consortium. The AGREE II Instrument [Electronic version]. Retrieved 22.04.13, from http://www.agreetrust.org. 2009.
69. C.A. Estabrooks, H. Chong, K. Brigidear, and J. Profetto-McGrath Profiling Canadian nurses' preferred knowledge sources for clinical practice Can J Nurs Res 37 2 2005 118 140
70. M. Dawes, and U. Sampson Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians Int J Med Inform 71 1 2003 9 15
71. E. Abt, J.D. Bader, and D. Bonetti A practitioner's guide to developing critical appraisal skills: translating research into clinical practice J Am Dent Assoc 143 4 2012 386 390
72. R. Spoth, L.A. Rohrbach, M. Greenberg, P. Leaf, C.H. Brown, and A. Fagan Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: The Translation Science to Population Impact (TSci Impact) framework Prev Sci 2013
73. L. Perrier, K. Mrklas, S. Shepperd, M. Dobbins, K.A. McKibbon, and S.E. Straus Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews in clinical decision-making: a systematic review J Gen Intern Med 26 4 2010 419 426
74. F. Legare, and H.O. Witteman Shared decision-making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice Health Affairs 32 2 2013 276 284