Evaluations of swes and sph numerical modelling techniques for dam break flows

Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 544-563

  Hui Pu, Jaan ^a   Shao, Songdong ^b,c   Huang, Yuefei ^c   Hussain, Khalid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Dam break flow; Hydrostatic assumption; ISPH model; Mesh free; SGUM SWEs model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890542730     PISSN: 19942060     EISSN: 1997003X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2013.11015492     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aureli F, Maranzoni A, Mignosa P, Ziveri C (2008). A weighted surface-depth gradient method for the numerical integration of the 2D shallow water equations with topography. Advances in Water Resources31(7):962-974.
2. Brufau P (2000). Simulación Bidimensional de Flujos Hidrodinámicos Transitorios en Gemotrías Irregulares (Two-dimensional Simulation of Hydrodynamic Transitions for Irregular Geometries). PhD Dissertation. Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain (In Spanish).
3. Chang TJ, Chang KH (2013). SPH modeling of one-dimensional non-rectangular and nonprismatic channel flows with open boundaries. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE139(11): 1142-1149.
4. Chang TJ, Kao HM, Chang KH, Hsu MH (2011). Numerical simulation of shallow-water dam break flows in open channels using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Hydrology408:78-90.
5. Chau KW, Jiang YW (2001). 3D numerical model for Pearl River estuary. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 127(1):72-82.
6. Chau KW, Jiang YW (2004). A threedimensional pollutant transport model in orthogonal curvilinear and sigma coordinate system for Pearl river estuary. International Journal of Environment and Pollution21(2): 188-198.
7. Chorin AJ (1968). Numerical solution of Navier-Stokes equations. Mathematics of Computation22:745-762.
8. Cummins SJ, Rudman M (1999). An SPH projection method. Journal of Computational Physics152:584-607.
9. Federico I, Marrone S, Colagrossi A, Aristodemo F, Antuono M (2012). Simulating 2D open-channel flows through an SPH model. European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids34:35-46.
10. Ferrari A, Fraccarollo L, Dumbser M, Toro EF, Armanini A (2010). Three-dimensional flow evolution after a dam break. Journal of Fluid Mechanics663:456-477.
11. Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977). Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society181:375-389.
12. Gotoh H, Sakai T (2006). Key issues in the particle method for computation of wave breaking. Coastal Engineering53:171-179.
13. Gotoh H, Shibahara T, Sakai T (2001). Sub-particle-scale turbulence model for the MPS method - Lagrangian flow model for hydraulic engineering. Computational Fluid Dynamic Journal9:339-347.
14. Hu K, Mingham CG, Causon DM (2006). A mesh patching method for finite volume modelling of shallow water flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids50:1381-1404.
15. Huang Y, Zhang N, Pei Y (2013). Well-balanced finite volume scheme for shallow water flooding and drying over arbitrary topography. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics7(1):40-54.
16. Kao HM, Chang TJ (2012). Numerical modeling of dambreak-induced flood and inundation using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Hydrology448:232-244.
17. Kuiry SN, Ding Y, Wang SSY (2010). Modelling coastal barrier breaching flows with well-balanced shock-capturing technique. Computers and Fluids39:2051-2068.
18. Lai W, Khan AA (2012). Discontinuous Galerkin method for 1D shallow water flows in natural rivers. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics6(1):74-86.
19. Lee ES, Molinec C, Xu R, Violeau D, Laurence D, Stansby P (2008). Comparison of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for SPH mesh free particle method. Journal of Computational Physics227:8417-8436.
20. Liang D (2010). Evaluating shallow water assumptions in dam-break flows. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management163(WM5):227-237.
21. Liang D, Falconer RA, Lin B (2006). Comparison between TVD-MacCormack and ADI-type solvers of the shallow water equations. Advances in Water Resources29(12): 1833-1845.
22. Liang D, Lin B, Falconer RA (2007). A boundary-fitted numerical model for flood routing with shock-capturing capability. Journal of Hydrology332:477-486.
23. Liang Q (2012). A simplified adaptive Cartesian grid system for solving the 2D shallow water equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids69(2):442-458.
24. Liang Q, Borthwick AGL (2009). Adaptive quadtree simulation of shallow flows with wet-dry fronts over complex topography. Computers and Fluids38(2):221-234.
25. Liang Q, Marche F (2009). Numerical resolution of well-balanced shallow water equations with complex source terms. Advances in Water Resources 32(6): 873-884.
26. Lin GF, Lai JS, Guo WD (2003). Finite-volume component-wise TVD schemes for 2D shallow water equations. Advances in Water Resources26: 861-873.
27. Lin GF, Lai JS, Guo WD (2005). Performance of high-resolution TVD schemes for 1D dam-break simulations. Journal of Chinese Institution of Engineers28(5):771-782.
28. Lin PZ, Wu YN, Bai JL, Lin QH (2011). A numerical study of dam-break flow and sediment transport from a quake lake. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami5(5):401-428.
29. Mingham CG, Causon DM (2000). Calculation of unsteady bore diffraction using a high resolution finite volume method. Journal of Hydraulic Research38(1):49-56.
30. Mingham CG, Causon DM (2008). A simple high-resolution advection scheme. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids56:469-484.
31. Monaco AD, Manenti S, Gallati M, Sibilla S, Agate G, Guandalini R (2011). SPH modeling of solid boundaries through a semi-analytic approach. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics5(1): 1-15.
32. Monaghan JJ (1994). Simulating free surface flows with SPH. Journal of Computational Physics110(2):399-406.
33. Monaghan JJ (2005). Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics68(8): 1703-1759.
34. Monaghan JJ, Rafiee A (2013). A simple SPH algorithm for multi-fluid flow with high density ratios. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids71(5):537-561.
35. Morris M (2000). CADAM-EU Concerted Action on Dambreak Modeling. Report No. SR 571, HR Wallingford UK.
36. Ozmen-Cagatay H, Kocaman S (2011). Dam-break flow in the presence of obstacle: experiment and CFD simulation. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics5(4):541-552.
37. Park K, Jung HS, Kim HS, Ahn SM (2005). Three-dimensional hydrodynamic-eutrophication model (HEM-3D): Application to Kwang-Yang Bay, Korea. Marine Environmental Research60(2): 71-193.
38. Prestininzi P (2008). Suitability of the diffusive model for dam break simulation: application to a CADAM experiment. Journal of Hydrology361:172-185.
39. Pu JH, Bakenov Z, Adair D (2012a). Advanced numerical solver for dam-break flow applications. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal14(1):73-82.
40. Pu JH, Cheng NS, Tan SK, Shao S (2012b). Source term treatment of SWEs using surface gradient upwind method. Journal of Hydraulic Research50(2): 145-153.
41. Pu JH, Shao S (2012). Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation of wave overtopping characteristics for different coastal structures. The Scientific World Journal163613:1-10.
42. Shao S (2005). SPH simulation of solitary wave interaction with a curtain-type breakwater. Journal of Hydraulic Research43(4):366-375.
43. Shao S, Gotoh H (2005). Turbulence particle models for tracking free surfaces. Journal of Hydraulic Research43(3):276-289.
44. Sun WY (2011). Instability in leapfrog and forward-backward schemes Part II: Numerical simulations of dam break. Computers and Fluids45:70-76.
45. Sun WY, Sun OMT (2011). A modified leapfrog scheme for shallow water equations. Computers and Fluids52:69-72.
46. Trancoso AR, Saraiva S, Fernandes L, Pina P, Leitâo P, Neves R (2005). Modelling macroalgae using a 3D hydrodynamic-ecological model in a shallow, temperate estuary. Ecological Modelling 187(2-3):232-246.
47. Tseng MH, Yen CL (2004). Evaluation of some flux-limited high-resolution schemes for dam-break problems with source terms. Journal of Hydraulic Research42(5):507-516.
48. Wu CL, Chau KW (2006). Mathematical model of water quality rehabilitation with rainwater utilization — a case study at Haigang. International Journal of Environment and Pollution28(3-4):534-545.
49. Zhou JG, Causon DM, Mingham CG, Ingram DM (2001). The surface gradient method for the treatment of source terms in the shallow water equations. Journal of Computational Physics168:1-25.