Performance of high-resolution TVD schemes for 1D dam-break simulations

Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Transactions of the Chinese Institute of Engineers,Series A/Chung-kuo Kung Ch'eng Hsuch K'an

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 771-782

  Lin, Gwo Fong ^a   Lai, Jihn Sung ^b   Guo, Wen Dar ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Dam break problem; Direct MUSCL Hancock (DMH) slope limiter approach; Flux vector splitting (FVS); High resolution total variation diminishing (TVD) scheme

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAMS; FLUXES; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); VECTORS;

DAM-BREAK PROBLEM; DIRECT MUSCL-HANCOCK (DMH) SLOPE LIMITER APPROACH; FLUX VECTOR SPLITTING (FVS); HIGH-RESOLUTION TOTAL VARIATION DIMINISHING (TVD) SCHEME;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 25144431533     PISSN: 02533839     EISSN: 21587299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02533839.2005.9671047     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alcrudo, F., Garcia-Navarro, P., and Saviron, J. M., 1992. “Flux Difference Splitting for 1D Open Channel Flow Equations,”. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 14 (9):1009–1018.
2. Chaudhry, M. F., 1993. Open-Channel Flow, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA:Prentice-Hall.
3. Delis, A. I., 2003. “Improved Application of the HLLE Riemann Solver for the Shallow Water Equations with Source Terms,”. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 19 (1):59–83.
4. Delis, A. I., and Skeels, C. P., 1998. “TVD Schemes for Open Channel Flow,”. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 26 (7):791–809.
5. Delis, A. I., Skeels, C. P., and Ryrie, S. C., 2000. “Evaluation of Some Approximate Riemann Solvers for Transient Open Channel Flows,”. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 38 (3):217–231.
6. Einfeldt, B., 1988. “On Godunov-Type Methods for Gas Dynamics,”. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 25 (2):294–318.
7. Garcia-Navarro, P., Alcrudo, F., and Saviron, J. M., 1992. “1D Open Channel Flow Simulation using TVD-MacCormack Scheme,”. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 118 (10):1359–1372.
8. Harten, A., 1983. “High Resolution Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws,”. Journal of Computational Physics, 49 (3):357–393.
9. Harten, A., and Hyman, J. M., 1983. “Self Adjusting Grid Methods for 1D Hyperbolic Conservation Laws,”. Journal of Computational Physics, 50 (2):235–269.
10. Harten, A., Lax, P. D., and Van Leer, B., 1983. “On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws,”. SIAM Review, 25 (1):35–61.
11. Hirsch, C., 1990. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, 2nd ed., New York, USA:John Wiley & Sons.
12. Jha, A. K., Akiyama, J., and Ura, M., 1995. “First-and Second-order Flux Difference Splitting Schemes for Dam-Break Problem,”. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 121 (12):877–884.
13. LeVeque, R. J., 1992. Numerical Methods for Conservational Laws, Switzerland:Birkhauser Verlagl.
14. Lin, G. F., Lai, J. S., and Guo, W. D., 2003. “Finite-Volume Component-Wise TVD Schemes for 2D Shallow Water Equations,”. Advances in Water Resources, 26 (8):861–873.
15. Liou, M. S., and Steffen, C. J., 1993. “A New Flux Splitting Scheme,”. Journal of Computational Physics, 107 (1):23–39.
16. Roe, P. L., 1981. “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes,”. Journal of Computational Physics, 43 (2):357–372.
17. Stoker, J. J., 1958. Water Waves:Mathematical Theory with Applications, Singapore:Wiley-Interscience.
18. Strang, G., 1968. “On the Construction and Comparison of Finite Difference Schemes,”. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 5 (3):506–517.
19. Sweby, P. K., 1984. “High Resolution Schemes using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws,”. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 21 (5):995–1011.
20. Tan, W. Y., 1992. Shallow Water Hydrodynamics, New York, USA:Elsevier.
21. Toro, E. F., 1997. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Berlin, Germany:Springer-Verlag.
22. Toro, E. F., 2001. Shock-Capturing Methods for Free-Surface Shallow Water Flows, New York, USA:John Wiley & Sons.
23. Tseng, M. H., and Chu, C. R., 2000. “The Simulation of Dam-Break Flows by an Improved Predictor-Corrector TVD Scheme,”. Advances in Water Resources, 23 (6):637–643.
24. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station (WES). 1960. “Flood Resulting from Suddenly Breached Dams,”. In Miscellaneous Paper No. 2–374 Vicksburg, MI, USA
25. Van Leer, B., 1979. “Towards the Ultimate Conservation Difference Scheme V, A Second-order Sequel to Godunov's Method,”. Journal of Computational Physics, 32 (3):101–136.
26. Van Leer, B., 1984. “On the Relation Between the Upwind-Differencing Schemes of Godunov, Engquist-Osher and Roe,”. SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computing, 5 (1):1–20.
27. Yang, J. Y., Chang, S. H., and Hsu, C. A., 1993. “Computations of Free Surface Flows, Part 1. One-Dimensional Dam-Break Flow,”. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 31 (1):19–34.
28. Yee, H. C., 1987. “Construction of Explicit and Implicit Symmetric TVD Schemes and Their Applications,”. Journal of Computational Physics, 68 (1):151–179.
29. Zhao, D. H., Shen, H. W., Lai, J. S., and Tabios, G. Q., 1996. “Approximate Riemann Solvers in FVM for 2D Hydraulic Shock Wave Modeling,”. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 122 (12):692–702.
30. Zoppou, C., and Roberts, S., 2003. “Explicit Schemes for Dam-Break Simulations,”. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129 (1):11–34.