Reconsidering Consent and Biobanking

International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue , 2011, Pages 111-125

  Bullock, Emma ^a   Widdows, Heather ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epistemological Problem; Ethical Model; Governance Mechanism; Joint Account; Waiver Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890532191     PISSN: 18750044     EISSN: 18750036     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1673-5_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Allen, J., and B. McNamara. 2009. “Reconsidering the Value of Consent in Biobank Research.” Bioeth 25 (3): 155–66.
2. Appelbaum, P. S., C. W. Lidz, and A. Meisel. 1987. Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 1989. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Biobank UK. 2007. “Further Information Leaflet.” Accessed February 25, 2011. http://www. ukbiobank.ac.uk/docs/urtherinfoleaflet241007.pdf.
5. Brock, D. W. 2001. “Genetics and Confidentiality.” The American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3): 34–35.
6. Brownsword, R. 2004. “The Cult of Consent: Fixation and Fallacy.” KCLJ 15: 223–51.
7. Brownsword, R. 2009. “Rights, Responsibility and Stewardship: Beyond Consent.” In The Governance of Genetic Information: Who Decides?, edited by H. Widdows and C. Mullen, 99–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Casado Da Rocha, A., and Seoane, J. A. 2008. “Alternative Consent Models for Biobanks: The New Spanish Law on Biomedical Research.” Bioethics 22 (8): 440–47.
9. Davis, H. 2003. Human Rights and Civil Liberties. Devon: Willan Publishing.
10. Declaration of Helsinki. 2008. “Section 24.” Accessed February 25, 2011. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.
11. Doukas, D. J., and J. W. Berg. 2001. “The Family Covenant and Genetic Testing.” The American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3): 2–16.
12. Dworkin, G. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Grisso, T., and P. S. Appelbaum. 1998. Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. HUGO (Human Genome Organisation) Ethics Committee. 2000. “Statement on Benefit Sharing.” Accessed March 1, 2011. http://mbrdb.nibio.go.jp/kiban01/downloadEN/HUGO/Statement_ on_Benefit_Sharing.htm
15. Hansson, M. G. 2005. “Building on Relationships of Trust in Biobank Research.” Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 415–18.
16. Husted, J. 1997. “Autonomy and a Right Not to Know.” In The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know, edited by R. Chadwick et al, 55–68. Aldershot: Ashgate.
17. Katz, J. 1984. The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. The John Hopkins University Press: London.
18. Knoppers, B. M. (Ed.). 1997. Human DNA: Law and Policy. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
19. Knoppers, B. M. 1999. “Who Should Have Access to Genetic Information.” In The Genetic Revolution and Human Rights, edited by J. Burley, 54–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Knoppers, B. M., and R. Chadwick. 2005. “Human Genetic Research: Emerging Trends in Ethics.” Nature 6: 75–79.
21. Manson, N. C., and O. O’Neill. 2007. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Mitchell, G. R., and K. Happe. 2001. “Informed Consent after the Human Genome Project.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 4 (3): 375–406.
23. Nuremberg Code. 1949. “Directives for Human Experimentation.” Accessed February 25, 2011. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html
24. O’Neill, O. 2002. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Parker, M 2001. “Confidentiality in Genetic Testing.” The American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3): 21–22.
26. Parker, M., and A. M. Lucassen. 2004. “Genetic Information: A Joint Account?” British Medical Journal 329: 165–67.
27. R. v. Brown and other appeals. 1993. 2 All ER 75.
28. Rothstein, M. A. 2005. “Expanding the Ethical Analysis of Biobanks.” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33: 89–101.
29. Schermer, M. 2002. The Different Faces of Autonomy: Patient Autonomy in Ethical Theory and Hospital Practice. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. UK Biobank. 2007. Ethics and Governance Framework. Accessed February 25, 2011. http://www. ukbiobank.ac.uk/docs/20071011_EGF_Version_3_1_0October_2007withTOR.pdf
31. Widdows, H. 2007a. “Conceptualising the Self in the Genetic Era.” Health Care Analysis 15: 5–12.
32. Widdows, H 2007b. “Reconceptualising Genetics: Challenges to Traditional Medical Ethics.” In Ethics and Law of Intellectual Property: Current Problems in Politics, Science and Technology, edited by C. Lenk, N. Hoppe, and R. Andomo, 159–74. Aldershot: Ashgate.
33. Widdows, H 2009a. “Constructing Communal Models of Governance.” In The Governance of Genetic Information: Who Decides? edited by H. Widdows and C. Mullen, 75–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Widdows, H 2009b. “Between the Individual and the Community: The Impact of Genetics on Ethical Models.” New Genetics and Society 28 (2): 173–88.
35. Winickoff, D. E 2003. “Governing Population Genomics.” Jurimetrics 43: 187–228.
36. Winickoff, D. E., and R. N. Winickoff. 2003. “The Charitable Trust as a Model for Genomic Biobanks.” The New England Journal of Medicine 349: 1180–84.