Cytogenetic studies on meiotic chromosome behaviors in sterile oriental x trumpet lily

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 6673-6684

  Luo, J R ^a,b   Van Tuyl, J M ^b   Arens, P ^b   Niu, L X ^a  

^a NORTHWEST A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chromosome behaviors; Lilium; Meiosis; Pollen sterility

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CYTOGENETICS; CYTOLOGY; GENOTYPE; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LILY; MEIOTIC SPINDLE; METAPHASE CHROMOSOME; MICRONUCLEUS; NYMPH; ORIENTAL X TRUMPET LILY; POLLEN MOTHER CELL; TELOPHASE;

ANAPHASE; BREEDING; CHIMERA; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC SPECIATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INFERTILITY; LILIUM; MEIOSIS; METAPHASE; POLLEN; RING CHROMOSOMES; SPINDLE APPARATUS; TELOPHASE;

EID: 84890529923     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/2013.December.13.1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahmad QN, Britten EJ and Byth DE (1977). Inversion bridges and meiotic behavior in species hybrids of soybeans. J. Hered. 68: 360-364.
2. Asano Y (1978). Studies on crosses between distantly related species of lilies. III. New hybrids obtained through embryo culture. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 47: 401-414.
3. Asano Y (1980). Studies on crosses between distantly related species of lilies. IV. The culture of immature hybrid embryos 0.3-0.4 mm long. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 49: 114-118.
4. Asano Y and Myodo H (1977a). Studies on crosses between distantly related species of lilies. I. For the intrastylar pollination technique. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 46: 59-65.
5. Asano Y and Myodo H (1977b). Studies on crosses between distantly related species of lilies. II. The culture of immature hybrid embryos. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 46: 267-273.
6. Barba-Gonzalez R (2005). The Use of 2n Gametes for Introgression Breeding in Oriental x Asiatic Lilies. Master's thesis, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen.
7. Baskin TI and Cande WZ (1990). The structure and function of the mitotic spindle in fowering plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 41: 277-315.
8. Brandham PE (1969). Inversion heterozygosity and sub-chromatid exchange in Agave stricta. Chromosoma 26: 270-286.
9. Brandham PE (1977). The meiotic behaviour of inversions in polyploid Aloineae. Chromosoma 62: 69-84.
10. Caetano-Pereira CM and Pagliarini MS (2001). A new meiotic abnormality in Zea mays: multiple spindles associated with abnormal cytokinesis in both divisions. Genome 44: 865-871.
11. Comber HF (1949). A new classifcation of the genus Lilium. Lily Yearbook. J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 13: 86-105.
12. Consolaro MEL and Pagliarini MS (1996). Microsporocytes of Centella asiatica (L.) Urban (Umbelliferae). Cytologia 61: 57-61.
13. Couzin DA and Fox DP (1973). U-type exchange in tulip meiosis. Chromosoma 41: 421-436.
14. De Jong PC (1974). Some notes on the evolution of lilies. Lily yearbook, North Am. Lily Soc. 27: 23-28.
15. Frankel OH (1937). Inversions in Fritillaria. J. Genet. 34: 447-462.
16. Gaulden ME (1987). Hypothesis: some mutagens directly alter specific chromosomal proteins (DNA topoisomerase II and peripheral proteins) to produce chromosome stickiness, which causes chromosome aberrations. Mutagenesis 2: 357-365.
17. Jones GH and Brumpton RJ (1971). Sister and non-sister chromatid U-type exchange in rye meiosis. Chromosoma 33: 115-128.
18. Karlov GI, Khrustaleva LI, Lim KB and Van Tuyl JM (1999). Homoeologous recombination in 2n-gamete producing interspecifc hybrids of Lilium (Liliaceae) studied by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Genome 42: 681-686.
19. Kitamura S, Akutsu M and Okazaki K (2009). Mechanism of action of nitrous oxide gas applied as a polyploidizing agent during meiosis in lilies. Sex Plant Reprod. 22: 9-14.
20. Kreft I (1968). Cytological studies on an inversion in barley. Hereditas 62: 14-24.
21. Lim KB (2000). Introgression Breeding Through Interspecifc Polyploidisation in Lily: A Molecular Cytogenetic Study. Master's thesis, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen.
22. McRae EA (1998). Lilies: A Guide for Growers and Collectors. Timber Press, Portland.
23. Morgan DT (1950). A cytogenetic study of inversions in Zea Mays. Genetics 35: 153-174.
24. Newman LJ (1966). Bridge and fragment aberrations in Podophyllum peltatum. Genetics 53: 55-63.
25. Pagliarini MS, De Freitas PM and Batista LAR (2000). Chromosome stickiness in meiosis of a Brazilian Paspalum accession. Cytologia 65: 289-294.
26. Rao PN, Ranganadham P and Nirmala A (1990). Behavior of a sticky desynaptic mutant in pearl millet. Genetica 81: 221-227.
27. Rieseberg LH, Baird SJ and Gardner KA (2000). Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 205-224.
28. Suzuki T and Tanaka I (1999). Attachment of kinetochores to spindle microtubules during meiosis I of Lilium microsporocytes. Chromosome Res. 7: 121-129.
29. Tilquin JP, Brouwer K and Horvat F (1984). Unusual cytological patterns in microsporogenesis in a cultivar of Fuchsia. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67: 413-417.
30. Ting YC (1965). Spontaneous chromosome inversions of Guatemalan teosintes (Zea mexicana). Genetica 36: 229-242.
31. Upcott M (1936). The parents and progeny of Aesculus carnea. J. Genet. 33: 135-149.
32. Upcott M (1937). The genetic structure of Tulipa II. Structural hybridity. J. Genet. 34: 339-399.
33. Van Tuyl JM, Van Diën MP, Van Creij MGM and Van Kleinwee TCM (1991). Application of in vitro pollination, ovary culture, ovule culture and embryo rescue for overcoming incongruity barriers in interspecifc Lilium crosses. Plant Sci. 74: 115-126.
34. Van Tuyl JM, Lim KB and Ramanna MS (2002). Interspecifc Hybridisation and Introgression. In: Breeding for Ornamentals: Classical and Molecular Approaches (Vainstein A, ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 85-103.
35. Yu HG, Muszynski MG and Kelly DR (1999). The maize homologue of the cell cycle checkpoint protein MAD2 reveals kinetochore substructure and contrasting mitotic and meiotic localization patterns. J. Cell Biol. 145: 425-435.