Cooperative breeding in the campo flicker 2: Patterns of reproduction and kinship

Condor

Volumn 115, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 855-862

  Dias, Raphael Igor ^a   Macedo, Regina H ^a   Goedert, Débora ^a   Webster, Michael S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^b Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperative breeding; Joint nesting; Mating system; Molecular analysis; Relatedness; Relationship; Tropics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890508430     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/cond.2013.120143     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Berg, E. C. 2005. Parentage and reproductive success in the Whitethroated Magpie Jay, Calocitta formosa, a cooperative breederwith female helpers. Animal Behaviour 70:375-385.
2. Berg, E. C., J. M. Eadi e, T. A. Langen, and A. F. Russell. 2009. Reverse sex-biased philopatry in a cooperative bird: genetic consequences and a social cause. Molecular Ecology 18:3486-3499.
3. Blomqvist, D., M. Andersson, C. Küpper, I. C. Cuthill, J. Kis, R. B. Lanctot, B. K. Sandercock, T. Székely, J. Wallander, and B. Kempenaers. 2002. Genetic similarity between mates and extrapair parentage in three species of shorebirds. Nature 419:613-615.
4. Blouin, M. S. 2003. DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:503-511.
5. Bower, A., and D. J. Ingold. 2004. Intraspecific brood parasitism in the Northern Flicker. Wilson Bulletin 116:94-97.
6. Brooker, M. G., I. Rowley, M. Adams, and P. R. Baverstock. 1990. Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26:191-199.
7. Brown, J. L. 1987. Helping and communal breeding in birds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
8. Cockburn, A. 2004. Mating systems and sexual conflict, p. 81-101. In W. D. Koenig and J. L. Dickinson [eds.], Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
9. Cornwallis, C. K., S. A. West, K. E. Davis, and A. S. Griffin. 2010. Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature 466:969-972.
10. Conner, R. N., D. Saenz, R. R. Schaefer, J. R. McCormi ck, D. C. Rudolph, and D. B. Burt. 2004. Group size and nest success in Red-cockaded Woodpeckers in west gulf coastal plain: helpers make a difference. Journal of Field Ornithology 75:74-78.
11. Davies, N. B. 2000. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T. & A. D. Poyser, London.
12. Dias, R. I., M. S. Webster, D. Goedert, and R. H. Macedo. 2013. Cooperative breeding in the Campo Flicker I: breeding ecology and social behavior. Condor 115:847-854.
13. Du, B., and X. Lu. 2010. Sex allocation and paternity in a cooperativelybreeding passerine: evidence for the male attractiveness hypothesis? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64:1631-1639.
14. Dunn, P. O., A. Cockburn, and R. A. Mulder. 1995. Fairywren helpers often care for young to which they are unrelated.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 259: 339-343.
15. Eikenaar, C., L. Brouwer, J. Komdeur, and D. Richardson. 2010. Sex biased natal dispersal is not a fixed trait in a stable population of Seychelles Warblers. Behaviour 147:1577-1590.
16. Eimes, J. A., P. G. Parker, J. L. Brown, and E. R. Brown. 2005. Extrapair fertilization and genetic similarity of social mates in the Mexican Jay. Behavioral Ecology 16:456-460.
17. Emlen, S. T., and P. H. Wrege. 1986. Forced copulations and intraspecific parasitism: two costs of social living in the Whitefronted Bee-eater. Ethology 71:2-29.
18. Emlen, S. T., and P. H. Wrege. 1991. Breeding biology of Whitefronted Bee-eaters at Nakuru - the influence of helpers on breeder fitness. Journal of Animal Ecology 60:309-326.
19. Emlen, S. T. 1995. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 92:8092-8099.
20. Griffith, S. C., I. P. F. Owens, and K. A. Thuman. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology 11:2195-2212.
21. Haig, S. M., J. R. Walters, and J. H. Plissner. 1994. Genetic evidence for monogamy in the cooperatively breeding Redcockaded Woodpecker. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34:295-303.
22. Hami lton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. 2. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:17-52.
23. Hardy, O. J., and X. Vekemans. 2002. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2:618-620
24. Heinsohn, R. G., P. O. Dunn, S, Legge, and M. C. Double. 2000. Coalitions of relatives and reproductive skew in cooperatively breeding White-winged Choughs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267:243-249.
25. Huyvaert, K. P., D. J. Anderson, T. C. Jones, W. R. Duan, and P. G. Parker. 2000. Extra- pair paternity in Waved Albatrosses. Molecular Ecology 9:1415-1419.
26. Kalinowski, S. T., M. L. Taper, and T. C. Marshall. 2007. Revising how the computer program Cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16:1099-1106.
27. Kalinowski, S. T., A. P. Wagner, and M. L. Taper. 2006. MLRelate: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 576-579
28. Koenig, W. D., and J. L. Dickinson. 2004. Introduction, p. 1-4. In W. D. Koenig and J. L. Dickinson [eds.], Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
29. Koenig, W. D., and J. Haydock. 2004. Incest and incest avoidance, p. 142-156. In W. D. Koenig and J. L. Dickinson [eds.], Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
30. Koenig, W. D., J. Haydock, and M. T. Stanback. 1998. Reproductive roles in the cooperative breeding Acorn Woodpecker: incest avoidance versus reproductive competition. American Naturalist 151:243-255.
31. Koenig, W. D., and P. B. Stacey. 1990. Acorn Woodpeckers: group-living and food storage under contrasting ecological conditions, p. 413-454. In P. B. Stacey and W. D. Koenig [eds.],Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
32. Komdeur, J., and P. Edelaar. 2001. Evidence that helping at the nest does not result in territory inheritance in the Seychelles Warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:2007-2012.
33. Kuhn, S., K. L. Wiebe, and B. Kempenaers. 2009. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci for the Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus). Molecular Ecology Resources 9:845-848.
34. Legge, S., and A. Cockburn. 2000. Social and mating system ofcooperatively breeding Laughing Kookaburras (Dacelo novaeguineae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 47:220-229.
35. Li, M. H., K. Välimäki, M. Piha, T. Pakkala, and J. Merilä [online]. 2009. Extrapair paternity and maternity in the Three-toed Woodpecker, Picoides tridactylus: insights from microsatellite-based parentage analysis. PLoS One 4:1-6 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal. pone.0007895
36. Lyon, B. E., and J. M. Eadie. 2008. Conspecific brood parasitism in birds: a life-history perspective. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 39:343-363.
37. Magrath, R. D., R. A. Johnstone, and R. G. Heinsohn. 2004. Reproductive skew, p. 157- 176. In W. D. Koenig and J. L. Dickinson [eds.], Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
38. Magrath, R. D., and L. A. Whittingham. 1997. Subordinate males are more likely to help if unrelated to the breeding female in cooperatively breeding White-browed Scrubwrens. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:185-192.
39. Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. E. B. Kruuk, and J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7:639-655.
40. Mee, A., D. P. Whitfield, D. B. A. Thompson, and T. Burke. 2004. Extrapair paternity in the Common Sandpiper, Actitis hypoleucos, revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Animal Behaviour 67: 971-980.
41. Mulder, R. A., P. O. Dunn, A. Cockburn, K. A. Lazenby-Cohen, and M. J. Howell. 1994. Helpers liberate female fairy-wrens from constraints on extra-pair mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 255:223-229.
42. Pechacek, P., K. G. Michalek, H. Winkler, and D. Blomqvist. 2005. Monogamy with exceptions: social and genetic mating system in a bird species with high paternal investment. Behaviour 142:1093-1114.
43. Queller, D. C., and K. Goodnight. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258-275.
44. R Development Core Team [online]. 2010: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
45. Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. Genepop (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86:248-249
46. Russell, A. F., N. E. Langmore, A. Cockburn, L. B. Astheimer, and R. M. Kilner. 2007. Reduced egg investment can conceal helper effects in cooperatively breeding birds. Science 317:941-944
47. Short, L. L. 1972. Systematics and behavior of South American flickers (Aves: Colaptes). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 149:1-110.
48. Tarvin, K. A., M. S. Webster, E. M. Tuttle, and S. Pruett-Jones. 2005. Genetic similarity of social mates predicts the level of extrapair paternity in Splendid Fairy-wrens. Animal Behaviour 70:945-955.
49. Vari an-Ramos, C. W., and M. S. Webster. 2012. Extrapair copulations reduce inbreeding for female Red-backed Fairywrens, Malurus melanocephalus. Animal Behaviour 83:857-864.
50. Vehrencamp, S. L., and J. S. Quinn. 2004. Avian joint laying systems, p. 177-196. In W. D. Koenig and J. L. Dickinson [eds.], Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
51. Webster, M. S., K. A. Tarvin, E. M. Tuttle and S. Pruett-Jones. 2004. Reproductive promiscuity in the Splendid Fairy-wren: effects of group size and reproduction by auxiliaries. Behavioral Ecology 15:907-915.
52. Wik tander, U., O. Olsson, and S. G. Nilsson. 2000. Parental care and social mating system in the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos minor. Journal of Avian Biology 31:447-456.
53. Winkler, H., D. A. Chri stie, and D. Nurney. 1995. Woodpeckers: a guide to the woodpeckers of the world. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
54. Winkler, H., and D. A. Christie. 2002. Family Picidae (woodpeckers), p. 296-555. In J. Del Hoyo, A. Elliott, and J. Sargatal [eds.], Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 7: jacamars to woodpeckers. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona
55. Wright, S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56:330-338