Domain adaptation for parsing

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 56-64

  Baucom, Eric ^a   King, Levi ^a   Kübler, Sandra ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

CO-TRAINING; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; LARGE AMOUNTS; PROBABILITY MODELING; QUALITY DATA; TARGET DOMAIN; TRAINING DATA; TRANSFER INFORMATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84890474455     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Daniel M Bikel. 2004. On the parameter space of generative lexicalized statistical parsing models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. 1998. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pages 92-100.
3. Thorsten Brants. 2000. Tnt: A statistical part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 224-231, Seattle, WA.
4. Wenliang Chen, Youzheng Wu, and Hitoshi Isahara. 2008. Learning reliable information for dependency parsing adaptation. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 113-120,Manchester, UK.
5. Michael Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pages 16-23,Madrid, Spain.
6. Michael Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
7. Hal Daume III. 2007. Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the 45th AnnualMeeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 256-263, Prague, Czech Republic.
8. Mark Dredze, John Blitzer, Partha Pratim Talukdar, Kuzman Ganchev, João Graca, and Fernando Pereira. 2007. Frustratingly hard domain adaptation for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task Session of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, pages 1051-1055, Prague, Czech Republic.
9. Kathleen Eberhard, Hannele Nicholson, Sandra Kübler, Susan Gunderson, and Matthias Scheutz. 2010. The Indiana "Cooperative Remote Search Task" (CReST) Corpus. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Valetta, Malta.
10. Jenny Rose Finkel and Christopher Manning. 2009. Hierarchical Bayesian domain adaptation. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 602-610, Boulder, CO.
11. Sally Goldman and Yan Zhou. 2000. Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 327-334, Stanford University, CA.
12. Daisuke Kawahara and Kiyotaka Uchimoto. 2008. Learning reliability of parses for domain adaptation of dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP), Hyderabad, India.
13. Dan Klein and Christopher Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 423-430, Sapporo, Japan.
14. Mitchell Marcus, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, and Beatrice Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
15. David McClosky, Eugene Charniak, and Mark Johnson. 2006. Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL), Sydney, Australia.
16. David McClosky, Eugene Charniak, and Mark Johnson. 2010. Automatic domain adaptation for parsing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 28-36, Los Angeles, CA.
17. Antonio Valerio Miceli Barone and Giuseppe Attardi. 2012. Dependency parsing domain adaptation using transductive SVM. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Learning in NLP, pages 55-59, Avignon, France.
18. Joakim Nivre, Johan Hall, Sandra Kübler, Ryan Mc-Donald, Jens Nilsson, Sebastian Riedel, and Deniz Yuret. 2007. The CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the CoNLL 2007 Shared Task. Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLPCoNLL), pages 915-932, Prague, Czech Republic.
19. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 433-440, Sydney, Australia.
20. Roi Reichart and Ari Rappoport. 2007. Self-training for enhancement and domain adaptation of statistical parsers trained on small datasets. In Proceedings of the 45th AnnualMeeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 616-623, Prague, Czech Republic.
21. Kenji Sagae and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2007. Dependency parsing and domain adaptation with LR models and parser ensembles. In Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task Session of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, pages 1044-1050, Prague, Czech Republic.
22. Kenji Sagae. 2010. Self-training without reranking for parser domain adaptation and its impact on semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Domain Adaptation for Natural Language Processing, pages 37-44, Uppsala, Sweden.
23. Beatrice Santorini. 1991. Bracketing guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
24. Helmut Schmid. 2000. LoPar: Design and implementation. Technical report, Universität Stuttgart.
25. Henry Thompson, Anne Anderson, Ellen Gurman Bard, Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon, Alison Newlands, and Cathy Sotillo. 1996. The HCRC Map Task Corpus: Natural dialogue for speech recognition. In Proceedings of the ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop, Plainsboro, NJ.
26. Hans van Halteren, Walter Daelemans, and Jakub Zavrel. 2001. Improving accuracy in word class tagging through the combination of machine learning systems. Computational Linguistics, 27(2):199-229.