Impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on consumer smoking behavior and quit intentions: Evidence from 6 waves (2004-11) of the ITC Four Country Survey

Tobacco Induced Diseases

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Adkison, Sarah E ^a   O'Connor, Richard J ^a   Borland, Ron ^b   Yong, Hua Hie ^b   Cummings, K Michael ^c   Hammond, David ^d   Fong, Geoffrey T ^d,e  

^a ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^e ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Consumer perceptions; Fire safe cigarettes; Generalized estimating equations (GEE); Reduced ignition propensity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CONSUMER; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING REGULATION; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890450599     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16179625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1617-9625-11-26     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Smoking-related fires in residential buildings 2008-2010. FEMA, Topical Fire Report Series 2012 11 4 1 12
2. Department for Communities and Local Government, Fire statistics, United Kingdom 2008 2010
3. Fire injuries, disasters, and costs from cigarettes and cigarette lights: a global overview. Leistikow BN, Martin DC, Milano CE, Prev Med 2000 31 2 91 99 10.1006/pmed.2000.0680 10938207 (Pubitemid 30637699)
4. Alpert H, Regulating cigarettes for fire safety May: A law synopsis by the Tobacc Control Legal Consortium 2007
5. Recent advances in cigarette ignition propensity research and development. Alpert HR, O'Connor R, Spalletta R, Connolly GN, Fire Technol 2010 46 2 275 289 10.1007/s10694-008-0070-8 20495669
6. Effect of the New York State cigarette fire safety standard on ignition propensity, smoke constituents, and the consumer market. Connolly GN, Alpert HR, Rees V, Carpenter C, Wayne GF, Vallone D, et al. Tob Control 2005 14 5 321 327 10.1136/tc.2005.011759 16183983 (Pubitemid 41396480)
7. Cigarette ignition propensity regulations http://www.laws.justice.gc.ca/ PDF/Regulation/S/SOR-2005-178.pdf (accessed 25 Jully 2012)
8. Australia: trade practices (Consumer product safety standard) (reduced fire risk cigarettes) regulations http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/ LegislativeInstrument1.nsf/0/3FE64581813B093ECA2574C900006E8A/$file/ 0817073A080829Z.pdf (accessed 25 July 2012)
9. ASTM Standard C33, Specification for concrete aggregates West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International 2003 doi:10.1520/C0033-03, http://www.astm.org
10. Payne TJ, Memo from Reynolds American inc: to general James M Shannon 2007
11. The Fire Safe Cigarette Act of 1994 HR 3885, Hearing before the committee on commerce, consumer protection and competitiveness (1994)
12. The case for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents. Gunja M, Ferris WG, Landman A, Connolly G, McGuire A, Tob Control 2002 11 4 346 353 10.1136/tc.11.4.346 12432160
13. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, Comments to proposed rulemaking, fire safety standars for cigarettes 2003 RJ Reynolds. http://tobaccodocuments.org (Bastes No. 528767372)
14. Hawkins M, Comments of philip morris USA, inc. ("PM USA") on the proposed New York fire safety standards for cigarettes (to add new part 429 to title 19 NY comp codes R & Regs) Phillip Morris USA 2003 http://tobaccodocuments.org (Bastes No. 528767429)
15. The role of sensory perception in the development and targeting of tobacco products. Carpenter CM, Wayne GF, Connolly GN, Addiction 2007 102 1 136 147 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01649.x 17207131 (Pubitemid 46006479)
16. Smokers' reactions to reduced ignition propensily cigarettes. O'Connor RJ, Giovino GA, Fix BV, Hyland A, Hammond D, Fong GT, et al. Tob Control 2006 15 1 45 49 10.1136/tc.2005.013532 16436405 (Pubitemid 43190323)
17. The impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on smoking behaviour in a cohort of Ontario smokers. O'Connor RJ, Fix BV, Hammond D, Giovino GA, Hyland A, Fong GT, et al. Inj Prev 2010 16 6 420 422 10.1136/ip.2009.025114 20643872
18. Smokers' self-reported responses to the introduction of reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes. Seidenberg AB, Rees VW, Alpert HR, O'Connor RJ, Giovino GA, Hyland A, et al. Tob Control 2012 21 3 337 340 10.1136/tc.2011. 043257 21752794
19. The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project. Fong GT, Cummings KM, Borland R, Hastings G, Hyland A, Giovino GA, et al. Tob Control 2006 15 3 3 11 16436390
20. Methods of the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Thompson ME, Fong GT, Hammond D, Boudreau C, Driezen P, Hyland A, et al. Tob Control 2006 15 3 ii12 iii18 16754941
21. A comparison of several approaches for choosing between working correlation structures in generalized estimating equation analysis of longitudinal binary data. Shults J, Sun W, Tu X, Kim H, Amsterdam J, Hilbe JM, et al. Stat Med 2009 28 18 2338 2355 10.1002/sim.3622 19472307
22. Prevalence and attributes of roll-your-own smokers in the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Young D, Borland R, Hammond D, Cummings KM, Devlin E, Yong H-H, et al. Tob Control 2006 15 3 ii76 iii82 16754951
23. Trends in roll-your-own smoking: findings from the ITC four-country survey (2002-2008). Young D, Yong H-H, Borland R, Shahab L, Hammond D, Cummings KM, et al. J Environ Public Health 2012 2012 7
24. Systematic biases in cross-sectional community studies may underestimate the effectiveness of stop-smoking medications. Borland R, Partos TR, Cummings KM, Nicotine Tob Res 2012 7 7