Smokers' self-reported responses to the introduction of reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes

Tobacco Control

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 337-340

  Seidenberg, Andrew B ^a   Rees, Vaughan W ^a   Alpert, Hillel R ^a   O'Connor, Richard J ^b   Giovino, Gary A ^c   Hyland, Andrew ^b   Connolly, Gregory N ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSUMER; FEMALE; FIRE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRODUCT SAFETY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COHORT STUDIES; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FEMALE; FIRES; HUMANS; MALE; MASSACHUSETTS; MIDDLE AGED; RISK-TAKING; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859960764     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2011.043257     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. New York State Office of Fire Prevention and Control. Fire Safety Standards for Cigarettes. http://www.dos.state.ny.us/fire/amendedcigaretterule.htm (accessed 11 Aug 2010).
2. Cigarette Ignition Propensity Regulations. http://www.laws.justice.gc.ca/PDF/Regulation/S/SOR-2005-178.pdf (accessed 3 Jan 2011).
3. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Ignition Strength of Cigarettes, E2187-02. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2002.
4. Ohlemiller TJ, Villa KM, Braun E, et al. Test Methods for Quantifying the Propensity of Cigarettes to Ignite Soft Furnishings. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce, 1993; NIST Special Publication 851.
5. Seidenberg AB, Rees VW, Alpert HR, et al. Ignition strength of 25 international cigarette brands. Tob Control 2011;20:77-80.
6. Alpert HR, O'Connor RJ, Spalletta R, et al. Recent advances in cigarette ignition propensity research and development. Fire Technol 2010;46:275-89.
7. Rees VW, Kreslake JM, Cummings KM, et al. Assessing consumer responses to potential reduced-exposure tobacco products: a review of tobacco industry and independent research methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:3225-40.
8. Carpenter CM, Wayne GF, Connolly GN. The role of sensory perception in the development and targeting of tobacco products. Addiction 2007;102:136-47.
9. Rose JE. Nicotine and non-nicotine factors in cigarette addiction. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;184:274-85.
10. Wayne GF, Connolly GN, Henningfield JE. Assessing internal tobacco industry knowledge of the neurobiology of tobacco dependence. Nicotine Tob Res 2005;7:711-12.
11. O'Connor RJ, Giovino GA, Fix BV, et al. Smokers' reactions to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes. Tob Control 2006;15:45-9.
12. Connolly GN, Alpert HR, Rees V, et al. Effect of the New York State cigarette fire safety standard on ignition propensity, smoke constituents, and the consumer market. Tob Control 2005;14:321-7.
13. O'Connor RJ, Fix BV, Hammond D, et al. The impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on smoking behavior in a cohort of Ontario smokers. Inj Prev 2010;16:420-2.
14. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Testing, Certification, Marking, and Enforcement of Massachusetts' Fire Standard Compliant Cigarettes. 501 CMR 14. http://www.mass.gov/Eeops/docs/dfs/news/press/final_unofficial_copy_12_1 0_07_cigarette_regulations.pdf (accessed 13 Jan 2011).
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008.
16. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 5th edn. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR, 2008.
17. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, et al. Measuring the heaviness of smoking using self-reported time to first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Br J Addict 1989;84:791-9.
18. Shahab L, Hammond D, O'Connor RJ, et al. The reliability and validity of selfreported puffing behaviour: evidence from a cross-national study. Nicotine Tob Res 2008;10:867-74.
19. O'Connor RJ, Rees VW, Norton KJ, et al. Does switching to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes alter smoking behavior or exposure to tobacco smoke constituents? Nicotine Tob Res 2010;12:1011-18.
20. Commonwealth of Massachusetts House of Representatives. An Act Relative to the Cigarette Excise and Health Care Funding. House No. 4899. http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/house/185/ht04pdf/ht04899.pdf (accessed 13 Jan 2011).
21. Institute of Medicine. Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.
22. Benowitz NL. Nicotine addiction. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2295-303.
23. General Assembly of the State of Vermont. An Act Relating to Reducing Fires Resulting From Careless Use of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco-Related Issues. Sec. 1. 20 V.S.A. chapter 173, subchapter 2A. http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/legdoc.cfm?URL=/docs/2006/acts/ACT068.HT M (accessed 13 Jan 2011).
24. New Hampshire State Legislature. Reduced Cigarette Ignition Propensity. Chapter 339-F. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XXXI/339-F/339-F-mrg.htm (accessed 13 Jan 2011).
25. Australia. Trade Practices (Consumer Product Safety Standard) (Reduced Fire Risk Cigarettes) Regulations. 2008. http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/LegislativeInstrument1.nsf/0 /3FE64581813B093ECA2574C900006E8A/$file/0817073A080829Z.pdf (accessed 11 Aug 2010).
26. Fire Safety of Cigarettes Improved in Finland. http://www.government.fi/ajankohtaista/tiedotteet/tiedote/en.jsp?oid=290 909 (accessed 12 Aug 2010).