Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: Evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2135-2160

  Belke, Eva ^a   Stielow, Anna ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Language production; Lexical retrieval; Semantic interference

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOMENCLATURE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TIME;

FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; NAMES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84890437049     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.775318     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2007). When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 604-614. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.604
2. Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2011). The dynamic microstructure of speech production: Semantic interference built on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 149-161. doi: 10.1037/a0021208
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
5. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
6. Badre, D., Poldrack, R. A., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Insler, R. Z., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalised selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 47, 907-918. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.07.023
7. Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2883-2901. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.015
8. Barde, L. H. F., Schwartz, M. F., Chrysikou, E. G., & Thompson-Schill, S. (2010). Reduced short-term memory span in aphasia and susceptibility to interference: Contribution of material-specific maintenance deficits. Neuropsychologia, 48, 909-920. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.010
9. Belke, E. (2008a). Effects of working memory load on lexical-semantic encoding in language production. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 357-363. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.357
10. Belke, E. (2008b). Finding words for things: Lexical-semantic encoding in language production (Unpublished habilitation dissertation). University of Bielefeld: Bielefeld, Germany.
11. Belke, E. (2012). Long-lasting inhibitory semantic context effects on object naming result from long-lasting pre-lexical facilitation at the conceptual level. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Belke, E., Brysbaert, M., Meyer, A. S., & Ghyselinck, M. (2005). Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: Evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition, 96, B45-B54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.006
13. Belke, E., & Meyer, A. S. (2007). Single and multiple object naming in healthy ageing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 1178-1211. doi: 10.1080/01690960701461541
14. Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 667-692.
15. Biegler, K. A., Crowther, J. E., & Martin, R. C. (2008). Consequences of an inhibition deficit for word production and comprehension. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 493-527. doi: 10.1080/02643290701862316
16. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664
17. Damian, M. F., & Als, L. C. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1372-1384. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1372
18. Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81, B77-B86. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00135-4
19. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 83, 283-321. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
20. Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123-147. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.123
21. Dell, G. S., Oppenheim, G. M., & Kittredge, A. K. (2008). Saying the right word at the right time: Syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 583-608. doi: 10.1080/01690960801920735
22. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
23. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
24. Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2002). A restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds. Aphasiology, 16, 20-55. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000203
25. Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100, 464-482. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
26. Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
27. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
28. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503-535. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
29. Martin, R. C., & Allen, C. M. (2008). A disorder of executive function and its role in language processing. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 201-210. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1082884
30. Martin, R. C., & Cheng, Y. (2006). Selection demands versus association strength in the verb generation task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 396-401. doi: 10.3758/BF03193859
31. Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C. (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 3-29. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2637
32. McCarthy, R. A., & Kartsounis, L. D. (2000). Wobbly words: Refractory anomia with preserved semantics. Neurocase, 6, 487-497. doi: 10.1080/13554790008402719
33. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
34. Moss, H. E., Abdallah, S., Fletcher, P., Bright, P., Pilgrim, L., Acres, K., & Tyler, L. K. (2005). Selecting among competing alternatives: Selection and retrieval in the left inferior frontal gyrus. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1723-1735. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi049
35. Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Broca's area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 906-924. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00244.x
36. Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114, 227-262. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007
37. Pisoni, A., Papagno, C., & Cattaneo, Z. (2012). Neural correlates of the semantic interference effect: New evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscience, 223, 56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.046
38. Rasch, B., Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Naumann, E. (2010a). G*Power-Ergänzungen zu Kapitel 7 (Varianzanalyse mit Messwiederholung) aus Rasch. Friese, Hofmann & Naumann (2010), [G*Power Supplement to Chapter 7 of Rasch et al. (2010b)]. Heidelberg: Springer. Retrieved from http://quantitative-methoden.de/Dateien/Auflage3/Band_II/Kapitel_7_GPower_Ergaenzungen_A3.pdf
39. Rasch, B., Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Naumann, E. (2010b). Quantitative Methoden [Quantitative methods] (3rd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
40. Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.88
41. Schade, U. (1999). Konnektionistische Sprachproduktion [Connectionist language production]. Wiesbaden: Deutscher UniversitätsVerlag.
42. Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A., & Hodgson, C. (2006). Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 199-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.002
43. Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Kimberg, Y. D., Hirshorn, E., Coslett, H. B., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 322-327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805874106
44. Scott, R. M., & Wilshire, C. E. (2010). Lexical competition in a case of nonfluent aphasia: Converging evidence from four different tasks. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 505-538. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2011.598853
45. Thompson-Schill, S. L., Bedny, M., & Goldberg, R. F. (2005). The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.006
46. Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Botvinick, M. M. (2006). Resolving conflict: A response to Martin and Cheng (2006). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 402-408. doi: 10.3758/BF03193860
47. Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A re-evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 14792-14797. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792
48. Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., & Kan, I. P. (1999). Effects of repetition and competition on prefrontal activity during word generation. Neuron, 23, 513-522. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80804-1
49. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and actions words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422-488. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001
50. Wagner, A. D., Bunge, S. A., & Badre, D. (2004). Cognitive control, semantic memory, and priming: Contributions from prefrontal cortex. In M. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 709-725). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Wheeldon, L. R., & Monsell, S. (1992). The locus of repetition priming of spoken word production. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 723-761.
52. Wheeldon, L. R., & Monsell, S. (1994). Inhibition of spoken word production by priming a semantic competitor. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 332-356. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1016
53. Wilshire, C. E., & McCarthy, R. A. (2002). Evidence for a context-sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 165-186. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000169
54. Wirth, M., Abdel Rahman, R., Künecke, J., König, T., Horn, H., Sommer, W., & Dierks, T. (2011). Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on behaviour and electrophysiology of language production. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3989-3998. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.015