Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: Parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2237-2252

  Bélanger, Nathalie N ^a   Mayberry, Rachel I ^b   Rayner, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Deaf readers; Eye movements; Orthographic codes; Phonological codes; Preview benefits; Reading level; Word processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RETINA FOVEA; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; DEAFNESS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; READING; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890430434     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.780085     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ashby, J., Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Rayner, K. (2006). Vowel processing in silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 416-424. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.416
2. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Dai, B. (2009). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999375-28). Retrieved from http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/
4. Bélanger, N. N., Baum, S. R., & Mayberry, R. I. (2012). Reading difficulties in adult deaf readers of French: Phonological codes, not guilty!. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 263-285. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.568555
5. Bélanger, N. N., Slattery, T. J., Mayberry, R. I., & Rayner, K. (2012). Skilled deaf readers have an enhanced perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 23(7), 816-823. doi: 10.1177/0956797611435130
6. Booth, J. R., Perfetti, C. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35, 3-19. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.3
7. Burden, V., & Campbell, R. (1994). The development of word-coding skills in the born deaf: An experimental study of deaf school-leavers. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(3), 331-349. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1994.tb00638.x
8. Chace, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological preview benefit: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 59, 209-217.
9. Cripps, J. H., McBride, K. A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Lexical processing with deaf and hearing: Phonology and orthographic masked priming. Arizona working papers in second language acquisition and teaching (Vol. 12, pp. 31-44). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
10. Daigle, D., & Armand, F. (2008). Phonological sensitivity in severely and profoundly deaf readers of French. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 699-717. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9087-5
11. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47, 365-382.
12. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mayberry, R. I. (2001). How do profoundly deaf children learn to read?. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), 222-229. doi: 10.1111/0938-8982.00022
13. Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2008). Neural constraints on a functional architecture for word recognition. In P. Cornelissen, P. Hansen, M. Kringelbach, & K. Pugh (Eds.), The neural basis of reading (pp. 3-33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Harris, M., & Moreno, C. (2006). Speech reading and learning to read: A comparison of 8-year-old profoundly deaf children with good and poor reading ability. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 189-201. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enj021
15. Kelly, L. (2003). The importance of processing automaticity and temporary storage capacity to the differences in comprehension between skilled and less skilled college-age deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(3), 230-249. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eng013
16. Kelly, L., & Barac-Cikoja, D. (2007). The comprehension of skilled deaf readers: The roles of word recognition and other potentially critical aspects of competence. In K. Cain & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 244-279). New York: Guilford Press.
17. Markwardt, F. C. (1989). Manual. Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18. Mayberry, R. I., del Giudice, A. A., & Lieberman, A. M. (2011). Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 164-188. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq049
19. Miellet, S., & Sparrow, L. (2004). Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: Evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading. Brain & Language, 90, 299-310. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00442-5
20. O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395-453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21. Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighbourhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 767-777. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.767
22. Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and masked priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473-485. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90017-E
23. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18, 148-162.
24. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
25. Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter?. Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 97-145. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002
26. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
27. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations in words. Perception, 8, 21-30. doi: 10.1068/p080021
28. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: Twenty years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
29. Rayner, K. (2009). The Thirty Fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461
30. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. F., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74. doi: 10.1111/1529-1006.00004
31. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII The Psychology of Reading. London: LEA.
32. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., & Binder, K. S. (1998). Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 476-497. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.476
33. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188-1200. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1188
34. Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 5-35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
35. Stracuzzi, D., & Kinsey, J. (2006). EyeTrack (Version 0.7.10h) [Computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Retrieved from www.psych.umass.edu/eyelab/software/
36. Transler, C., Gombert, J.-E., & Leybaert, J. (2001). Phonological decoding in severely and profoundly deaf children: Similarity judgment between written pseudowords. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(1), 61-82. doi: 10.1017/S0142716401001047
37. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
38. Wang, Y., Trezek, B., Luckner, J., & Paul, P. V. (2008). The role of phonology and phonologically related skills in reading instruction for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 153(4), 396-407. doi: 10.1353/aad.0.0061
39. Waters, G., & Doehring, D. (1990). Reading acquisition in congenitally deaf children who communicate orally: Insights from an analysis of component reading, language, and memory skills. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 323-373). New York, NY: Academic Press.
40. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
41. Williams, C. C., Perea, M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). Previewing the neighborhood: The role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1072-1082. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1072