Leveraging electronic healthcare record standards and semantic web technologies for the identification of patient cohorts

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 20, Issue E2, 2013, Pages

  Fernández Breis, Jesualdo Tomás ^a   Maldonado, José Alberto ^b   Marcos, Mar ^c   Legaz García, María del Carmen ^a   Moner, David ^b   Torres Sospedra, Joaquín ^c   Esteban Gil, Angel ^d   Martínez Salvador, Begoña ^c   Robles, Montserrat ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

^d Fundacion para la Formacion e Investigacion Sanitarias   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COLORECTAL CANCER; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PHENOTYPE; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY; SEMANTICS; STANDARDIZATION;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS/STANDARDS*; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; SEMANTICS*;

ALGORITHMS; BIOLOGICAL ONTOLOGIES; COHORT STUDIES; DATA MINING; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INTERNET; PHENOTYPE; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84890396960     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001923     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Cuggia M, Besana P, Glasspool P. Comparing semi-automatic systems for recruitment of patients to clinical trials. Int J Med Inform 2011;80:371-88.
2. Sujansky W. Heterogeneous database integration in biomedicine. J Biomed Inform 2001;34:285-98.
3. Schadow G, Russler DC, Mead CN, et al. Integrating medical information and knowledge in the HL7 RIM. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, 2000:764-8.
4. Johnson PD, Tu SW, Musen MA, et al. A virtual medical record for guideline-based decision support. Proceedings of the AMIA 2001 Annual Symposium, 294-8.
5. German E, Leibowitz A, Shahar Y. An architecture for linking medical decision-support applications to clinical databases and its evaluation. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:203-18.
6. Peleg M, Keren S, Denekamp Y. Mapping computerized clinical guidelines to electronic medical records: knowledge-data ontological mapper (KDOM). J Biomed Inform 2008;41:180-201.
7. Maldonado JA, Martínez-Costa C, Moner D, et al. Using the ResearchEHR platform to facilitate the practical application of the EHR standards. J Biomed Inform 2012;45:746-62.
8. Parker CG, Rocha RA, Campbell JR, et al. Detailed clinical models for sharable, executable guidelines. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;107:145-8.
9. Clinical Information Modeling Initiative. http://informatics.mayo.edu/CIMI/index.php/ Main_Page (accessed Jun 2013).
10. W3C, OWL2 Web Ontology Language. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/ (accessed Jun 2013).
11. European Commission. Semantic interoperability for better health and safer healthcare. Deployment and research roadmap for Europe. ISBN-13: 978-92-79-11139-6, 2009.
12. SemanticHealthNet. http://www.semantichealthnet.eu/ (accessed Jun 2013).
13. Martínez-Costa C, Menárguez-Tortosa M, Fernández-Breis JT, et al. A model-driven approach for representing clinical archetypes for Semantic Web environments. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:150-64.
14. Iqbal AM. An OWL-DL ontology for the HL7 reference information model. Toward useful services for elderly and people with disabilities Berlin: Springer, 2011:168-75.
15. Tao C, Jiang G, Oniki TA, et al. A semantic-web oriented representation of the clinical element model for secondary use of electronic. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:554-62.
16. Heymans S, McKennirey M, Phillips J. Semantic validation of the use of SNOMED CT in HL7 clinical documents. J Biomed Semantics 2011;2:2.
17. Menárguez-Tortosa M, Fernández Breis JT. OWL-based reasoning methods for validating archetypes. J Biomed Inform 2013;46:304-17.
18. Lezcano L, Sicilia MA, Rodríguez-Solano C. Integrating reasoning and clinical archetypes using OWL ontologies and SWRL rules. J Biomed Inform 2011;44:343-53.
19. Tao C, Wongsuphasawat K, Clark K, et al. Towards event sequence representation, reasoning and visualization for EHR data. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium (IHI'12). New York, NY, USA: ACM:801-6.
20. Bodenreider O. Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2008;67-79.
21. Beale T. Archetypes. Constraint-based domain models for future-proof information systems. http://www.openehr.org/files/publications/archetypes/archetypes_beale_ web_2000.pdf
22. SNOMED-CT. http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/ (accessed Jun 2013).
23. UMLS Terminology Services. https://uts.nlm.nih.gov/home.html (accessed Jun 2013).
24. The openEHR Foundation, openEHR Clinical Knowledge Manager. http://www. openehr.org/knowledge/ (accessed Jun 2013).
25. Maldonado JA, Moner D, Boscá D, et al. LinkEHR-Ed: a multi-reference model archetype editor based on formal semantics. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:559-70.
26. SAXON XSLT and XQuery processor. http://saxon.sourceforge.net/ (accessed Jun 2013).
27. NCBO Bioportal. http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ (accessed Jun 2013).
28. The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System. http://protege. stanford.edu/ (accessed Jun 2013).
29. Semantic Web Integration Tool. http://sele.inf.um.es/swit (accessed Jun 2013).
30. Hermit Reasoner. http://www.hermit-reasoner.com/ (accessed Jun 2013).
31. The OWLAPI. http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/ (accessed Jun 2013).
32. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Burden of Disease. http://www. healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd (accessed Jun 2013).
33. Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis 2010. First Edition. European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-16435-4.
34. W3C. XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language. http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/ (accessed Jun 2013).
35. DL Query. http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/DL_Query (accessed Jun 2013).
36. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ (accessed Jun 2013).
37. Semantic Web Rule Language. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/ (accessed Jun 2013).
38. Marcos M, Maldonado JA, Martínez-Salvador B, et al. Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: a case study in clinical trial eligibility. J Biomed Inform 2013;46:676-89.
39. Marcos M, Maldonado JA, Martínez-Salvador B, et al. An archetype-based solution for the interoperability of computerised guidelines and electronic health records. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2011;6747:276-85.
40. MobiGuide: Guiding patients anytime everywhere. http://www.mobiguide-project.eu/ (accessed Jun 2013).
41. EURECA: Enabling information re-Use by linking clinical RE search and Care. http:// eurecaproject.eu/ (accessed Jun 2013).
42. Rea S, Pathak J, Savova G, et al. Building a robust, scalable and standards-driven infrastructure for secondary use of EHR data: the SHARPn project. J Biomed Inform 2012;45:763-71.
43. Clinical Element Models. http://informatics.mayo.edu/sharp/index.php/CEMS (accessed Jun 2013).