Semantic validation of the use of SNOMED CT in HL7 clinical documents

Journal of Biomedical Semantics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Heymans, Stijn ^a   McKennirey, Matthew ^a   Phillips, Joshua ^a  

^a SemanticBits   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855973554     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-2-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Health Level Seven International. [ http://www.hl7.org/ ]
2. George Beeler J, Duteau JH, Grieve G, McKenzie L, Nelson D: HL7 Reference Information Model. 2010, [Version 0231], [ http://www.hl7.org/ ]
3. Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Boyer S, Beebe C, Behlen FM, Biron PV, Shabo A: HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2006, 13: 30-39. 10.1197/jamia.M1888.
4. Cheetham E, Markwell D, Dolin R: Using SNOMED CT in HL7 Version 3; Implementation Guide, Release 1.5. 2009, [HL7 Version 3 Implementation Guide: Using SNOMED CT, Release 1 Last Ballot: DSTU Ballot 4], [ http://www.hl7.org/ ]
5. Patel-Schneider PF, Hayes P, Horrocks I: OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. Recommendation 10 February 2004, W3C. 2004, [ http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/ ]
6. Uschold M, Grüninger M: Ontologies: principles, methods, and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review. 1996, 11 (2): 93-155. 10.1017/S0269888900007797.
7. Open Health Workbench. [ https://www.projects.openhealthtools.org/sf/projects/openhealthworkbench/ ]
8. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O: The Semantic Web. Scientific American. 2001, 284 (5): 34-43. 10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34.
9. Klyne G, Carroll JJ: Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. Recommendation 10 February 2004, W3C. 2004, [ http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/ ]
10. Brickley D, Guha RV: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. Recommendation 10 February 2004, W3C. 2004, [ http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/ ]
11. Motik B, Patel-Schneider PF, Parsia B: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. Recommendation 27 October 2009, W3C. 2009, [ http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/ ]
12. Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness DL, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider PF, (Eds): The Description Logic Handbook. 2003, Cambridge University Press
13. Spackman K, Campbell K, Côté R: SNOMED RT: A reference terminology for health care. AMIA'97- Proceedings of the 1997 AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. Edited by: Masys D. 1997, Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 640-644.
14. The Manchester OWL Syntax. [ http://www.co-ode.org/resources/reference/manchester_syntax/ ]
15. Tao J, Sirin E, Bao J, McGuinness D: Integrity Constraints in OWL. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2010). 2010, AAAI Press
16. Pellet Integrity Constraints: Validating RDF with OWL. [ http://clarkparsia.com/pellet/icv/ ]
17. Pellet: OWL 2 Reasoner for Java. [ http://clarkparsia.com/pellet/ ]
18. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation - SNOMED CT. [ http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/ ]
19. Spackman K: SNOMED CT Stated Relationships Guide. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation. 2010, [Tabular Format and OWL Transformations]
20. Spackman KA, Dionne R, Mays E, Weis J: Role Grouping as an Extension to the Description Logic of Ontylog, motivated by Concept Modeling in SNOMED. Proc of AMIA Symp. 2002, 712-716.
21. Bishop C, Buitendijk H, Frean I, Loyd P, Smithies R: Domain: Clinical Statement. 2010, [HL7 Version 3 Standard: Clinical Statement Pattern, Release 1 Last Ballot: Draft for Comment Ballot 1], [ http://www.hl7.org/ ]
22. Validation of SNOMED CT Terms in HL7 CDA Documents. [ http://demo.semanticbits.com/public/videos/CDAValidation/CDAValidation.htm ]
23. Spronk R: CDA Around the World: Archive of CDA Instance Examples. [Accessed July 2010], [ http://www.ringholm.de/download/CDA_R2_examples.zip ]
24. NIST: CDA Guideline Validation. [Accessed July 2010], [ http://xreg2.nist.gov/cda-validation/downloads.html ]
25. Konev B, Lutz C, Walther D, Wolter F: CEX and MEX: Logical Diff and Logic-based Module Extraction in a Fragment of OWL. OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED). 2008
26. Eiter T, Ianni G, Lukasiewicz T, Schindlauer R, Tompits H: Combining Answer Set programming with Description Logics for the Semantic Web. Artificial Intelligence. 2008, 172 (12-13): 1495-1539. 10.1016/j.artint.2008.04.002.