Electrochemical uranyl cation biosensor with DNA oligonucleotides as receptor layer

Bioelectrochemistry

Volumn 96, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-6

  Jarczewska, Marta ^a   Ziółkowski, Robert ^a   Górski, Łukasz ^a   Malinowska, Elzbieta ^a  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

DNA biosensor; Electrochemical biosensor; Metals determination; Mixed monolayer; Uranyl cation

Indexed keywords

DNA; MONOLAYERS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDES; POSITIVE IONS; PROBES; SENSORS; URANIUM; URANIUM ALLOYS;

DNA BIOSENSORS; DNA OLIGONUCLEOTIDES; ELECTROCHEMICAL BIOSENSOR; ELECTROCHEMICAL DNA BIOSENSORS; LOWER DETECTION LIMIT; MIXED MONOLAYERS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBES; STRONG INTERACTION;

BIOSENSORS;

CATION; DNA; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; URANYL CATION;

ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; DNA PROBE; ELECTRODE; INCUBATION TIME; LIMIT OF DETECTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBE; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

DNA BIOSENSOR; ELECTROCHEMICAL BIOSENSOR; METALS DETERMINATION; MIXED MONOLAYER; URANYL CATION;

BASE SEQUENCE; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; DNA PROBES; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTRODES; EQUIPMENT REUSE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBES; URANIUM COMPOUNDS;

EID: 84890370849     PISSN: 15675394     EISSN: 1878562X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2013.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Whitesides G.M., Laibinis P.E. Wet chemical approaches to the characterization of organic surfaces: self-assembled monolayers, wetting, and the physical-organic chemistry of the solid-liquid interface. Langmuir 1990, 6:87-96.
2. Wenzl I., Yam C.M., Barriet D., Lee T.R. Structure and wettability of methoxy-terminated self-assembled monolayers on gold. Langmuir 2003, 19:10217-10224.
3. Houston J.E., Kim H.I. Adhesion, friction, and mechanical properties of functionalized alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35:547-553.
4. Petrenko V.F., Peng S. Reduction of ice adhesion to metal by using self-assembling monolayers (SAMs). Can. J. Physiol. 2003, 81:387-393.
5. Burleigh T.D., Gu Y., Donahey G., Vida M., Waldeck D.H. Tarnish protection of silver using a hexadecanethiol self-assembled monolayer and descriptions of accelerated tarnish tests. Corrosion 2001, 57:1066-1074.
6. El-Sayed A.-R., Harm U., Mangold K.-M., Fürbeth W. Protection of galvanized steel from corrosion in NaCl solution by coverage with phytic acid SAM modified with some cations and thiols. Corros. Sci. 2012, 55:339-350.
7. Aizenberg J. Patterned crystallisation on self-assembled monolayers with integrated regions of disorder. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 21:3963-3968.
8. Wang X., Ingall E., Lai B., Stack A.G. Self-assembled monolayers as templates for heme crystallization. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 10:798-805.
9. Shen C.-H., Lin J.-C. Improving the surface biocompatibility with the use of mixed zwitterionic self-assembled monolayers prepared by a proper solvent. Langmuir 2011, 27:7091-7098.
10. Widge A.S., Jeffries-El M., Cui X., Lagenaur C.F., Matsuoka Y. Self-assembled monolayers of polythiophene conductive polymers improve biocompatibility and electrical impedance of neural electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22:1723-1732.
11. Hu J., Zhang J., Liu F., Kittredge K., Whitesell J.K., Fox M.A. Competitive photochemical reactivity in a self-assembled monolayer on a colloidal gold cluster. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123:1464-1470.
12. Adams D.M., Brus L., Chidsey C.E.D., Creager S., Creutz C., Kagan C.R., Kamat P.V., Zhu X. Charge transfer on the nanoscale: current status. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107:6668-6697.
13. Naaman R. Molecular controlled nano-devices. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13:13153-13161.
14. Leggett G.J. Friction force microscopy of self-assembled monolayers: probing molecular organisation at the nanometre scale. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 479:17-38.
15. Love J.C., Estroff L.A., Kriebel J.K., Nuzzo R.G., Whitesides G.M. Self-assembled monolayers of thiolates on metals as a form of nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105:1103-1169.
16. Gooding J.J., Darwish N. The rise of self-assembled monolayers for fabricating electrochemical biosensors-an interfacial perspective. Chem. Rec. 2012, 12:92-105.
17. Luong J.H.T., Male K.B., Glennon J.D. Biosensor technology: technology push versus market pull. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26:492-500.
18. Schwartz D.K. Mechanisms and kinetics of self-assembled monolayer formation. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2001, 52:107-137.
19. Gooding J.J., Ciampi S. The molecular level modification of surfaces: from self-assembled monolayers to complex molecular assemblies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40:2704-2718.
20. Labuda J., Oliveira Brett A.M., Evtugyn G., Fojta M., Mascini M., Ozsoz M., Palchetti I., Paleček E., Wang J. Electrochemical nucleic acid-based biosensors: concepts, terms, and methodology (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82:1161-1187.
21. Ellington A.D., Szostak J.W. In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature 1990, 346:818-822.
22. Hianik T., Wang J. Electrochemical aptasensors -recent achievements and perspectives. Electroanalysis 2009, 21:1223-1235.
23. Palecek E., Bartosik M. Electrochemistry of nucleic acids. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112:3427-3481.
24. Farjami E., Campos R., Nielsen J.S., Gothelf K.V., Kjems J., Ferapontova E.E. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85:121-128.
25. Oliveira S.C.B., Corduneanu O., Oliveira-Brett A.M. In situ evaluation of heavy metal-DNA interactions using an electrochemical DNA biosensor. Bioelectrochem 2008, 72:53-58.
26. Ferapontova E.E. Electrochemical Indicators for DNA electroanalysis. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2011, 7:51-62.
27. Shao Y., Wang J., Wu H., Liu J., Aksay I.A., Lin Y. Graphene based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Electroanalysis 2010, 22:1027-1036.
28. Jacobs C.B., Peairs M.J., Venton B.J. Review: carbon nanotube based electrochemical sensors for biomolecules. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 662:105-127.
29. Wong E.L.S., Chow E., Gooding J.J. The electrochemical detection of cadmium using surface-immobilized DNA. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9:845-849.
30. Miao P., Liu L., Li Y., Li G. A novel electrochemical method to detect mercury(II) ions. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11:1904-1907.
31. 2+ using hemin as a redox indicator. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56:3153-3158.
32. Wu D., Zhang Q., Chu X., Wang H., Shen G., Yu R. Ultrasensitive electrochemical sensor for mercury(II) based on target-induced structure-switching DNA. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25:1025-1031.
33. Zhou X., Su Q., Xing D. An electrochemiluminescent assay for high sensitive detection of mercury(II) based on isothermal rolling circular amplification. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 713:45-49.
34. Liu X., Sun C., Wu H., Zhang Y., Jiang J., Shen G., Yu R. Label-free electrochemical biosensor of mercury ions based on DNA strand displacement by thymine-Hg(II)-thymine complex. Electroanal 2010, 22:2110-2116.
35. 2+ ions. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46:3107-3109.
36. Zhang H., Jiang B., Xiang Y., Su J., Chai Y., Yuan R. DNAzyme-based highly sensitive electronic detection of lead via quantum dot-assembled amplification labels. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 28:135-138.
37. 2+. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83:6896-6901.
38. + detection. Talanta 2011, 85:1603-1608.
39. Gong H., Li X. Y-type, C-rich DNA probe for electrochemical detection of silver ion and cysteine. Analyst 2011, 136:2242-2246.
40. Ziółkowski R., Górski Ł., Oszwałdowski S., Malinowska E. Electrochemical uranyl biosensor with DNA oligonucleotides as receptor layer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 402:2259-2266.
41. Becker A., Tobias H., Mandler D. Electrochemical determination of uranyl ions using a self-assembled monolayer. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:8627-8631.
42. Banerjeea R., Katsenovichb Y., Lagosb L., Sennc M., Najad M., Balsamoe V., Pannellc K.H., Li Ch. Functional magnetic nanoshells integrated nanosensor for trace analysis of environmental uranium contamination. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55:7897-7902.
43. Shervedani R.K., Mozaffari S.A. Preparation and electrochemical characterization of a new nanosensor based on self-assembled monolayer of cysteamine functionalized with phosphate groups. Surf. Coat. 2005, 198:123-128.
44. Tani A., Thomson A.J., Butt J.N. Methylene blue as an electrochemical discriminator of single-and double-stranded oligonucleotides immobilised on gold substrates. Analyst 2001, 126:1756-1759.
45. Ortiz M., Fragoso A., Ortiz P.J., O'Sullivan C.K. Elucidation of the mechanism of single-stranded DNA interaction with methylene blue: a spectroscopic approach. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem 2011, 218:26-32.
46. United States Environmental Protection Agency (Accessed 26 Oct 2012). http://www.epa.gov.
47. Ziółkowski R., Górski Ł., Zaborowski M., Malinowska E. Application of mass fabricated silicon-based gold transducers for amperometric biosensors. Bioelectrochem 2010, 80:31-37.
48. Cooper J.M. Biosensors 2003, Oxford University Press, A practical approach.
49. Song Y., Wang L. Well-ordered structure of methylene blue monolayers on Au(111) surface: electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy studies. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2009, 72:79-84.
50. Creanga C., Serban S., Pittson R.W., Murr N.E. "No calibration" type sensor in routine amperometric bio-sensing: an example of a disposable hydrogen peroxide biosensor. Biosensors -Emerging Materials and Applications 2011, 141-152. InTech Rijeka, Croatia. P. Andrea (Ed.).