Perceived Utility (not Sympathy) Mediates the Proportion Dominance Effect in Helping Decisions

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 37-47

  Erlandsson, Arvid ^a   Björklund, Fredrik ^a   Bäckström, Martin ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Helping motivation; Identifiable victim effect; Perceived utility; Proportion dominance effect; Sympathy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890370318     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: 10990771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1789     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baron, J. (1994). Thinking and deciding (2nd edn). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Baron, J. (1997). Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 301-309. doi: 10.1023/a:1007796310463
3. Baron, J., & Miller, J. G. (2000). Limiting the scope of moral obligations to help: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(6), 703-725. doi: 10.1177/0022022100031006003
4. Bartels, D. M. (2006). Proportion dominance: The generality and variability of favoring relative savings over absolute savings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 76-95. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.004
5. Bartels, D. M., & Burnett, R. C. (2011). A group construal account of drop-in-the-bucket thinking in policy preference and moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.003
6. Cameron, C. D., & Payne, B. K. (2011). Escaping affect: How motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0021643
7. Cryder, C. E., & Loewenstein, G. (2012). Responsibility: The tie that binds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 441-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.009
8. Dickert, S., Sagara, N., & Slovic, P. (2011). Affective motivations to help others: A two-stage model of donation decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(4), 361-376. doi: 10.1002/bdm.697
9. Dickert, S., Västfjäll, D., Kleber, J., & Slovic, P. (2012). Valuations of human lives: normative expectations and psychological mechanisms of (ir)rationality. Synthese, 189(1), 95-105. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0137-4
10. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390-405. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
11. Fetherstonhaugh, D., Slovic, P., Johnson, S., & Friedrich, J. (1997). Insensitivity to the value of human life: A study of psychophysical numbing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 283-300. doi: 10.1023/a:1007744326393
12. Friedrich, J., Barnes, P., Chapin, K., Dawson, I., Garst, V., & Kerr, D. (1999). Psychophysical numbing: When lives are valued less as the lives at risk increase. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 277-299. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp0803_05
13. Friedrich, J., & Dood, T. L. (2009). How many casualties are too many? Proportional reasoning in the valuation of military and civilian lives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(11), 2541-2569. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00537.x
14. Friedrich, J., Lucas, G., & Hodell, E. (2005). Proportional reasoning, framing effects, and affirmative action: Is six of one really half a dozen of another in university admissions? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 195-215. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.06.002
15. Friedrich, J., & McGuire, A. (2010). Individual differences in reasoning style as a moderator of the identifiable victim effect. Social Influence, 5(3), 182-201. doi: 10.1080/15534511003707352
16. Greene, J. D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant's soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 35-80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2010). General evaluability theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 343-355. doi: 10.1177/1745691610374586
18. Jenni, K., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining the identifiable victim effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 235-257. doi: 10.1023/a:1007740225484
19. th, 2013 from http://www.rescue.org/blog/face-
20. Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 115-134. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.6.2.115
21. Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., Jacowitz, K. E., & Grant, P. (1993). Stated willingness to pay for public goods: A psychological perspective. Psychological Science, 4(5), 310-315. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00570.x
22. Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005a). The "identified victim" effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 157-167. doi: 10.1002/bdm.492
23. Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005b). The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.003
24. Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2007). "One of us": Outstanding willingness to help save a single identified compatriot. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(2), 150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.006
25. Loewenstein, G., & Small, D. A. (2007). The scarecrow and the tin man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 112-126. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.112
26. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (2011). Joint presentation reduces the effect of emotion on evaluation of public actions. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 657-675. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.512512
27. th, 2013 from http://journal.sjdm.org/vol2.2.htm
28. Slovic, P., & Västfjäll, D. (2010). Affect, moral intuition, and risk. Psychological Inquiry, 21(4), 387-398. doi: 10.1080/1047840x.2010.521119
29. Small, D. A. (2010). Reference-dependent sympathy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(2), 151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.03.001
30. Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping the victim or helping a victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5-16. doi: 10.1023/a:1022299422219
31. Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005
32. Small, D. A., & Verrochi, N. M. (2009). The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 777-787. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.46.6.777
33. Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., Kropp, A., & Siem, B. (2006). Empathy-motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 943-956. doi: 10.1177/0146167206287363
34. Unger, P. (1996). Living high and letting die. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::aid-bdm318>3.0.co;2-f
36. Thaler, R. H. (2008). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 27(1), 15-25. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1070.0330
37. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323. doi: 10.1007/bf00122574