Effects of multi-polar radiofrequency and pulsed electromagnetic field treatment in Koreans: Case series and survey study

Journal of Dermatological Treatment

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 310-313

  Lee, Young Bok ^a   Eun, Young Sun ^a   Lee, Ji Hae ^a   Cheon, Min Seok ^a   Cho, Baik Kee ^a   Park, Hyun Jeong ^a  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Korean; Multi polar radiofrequency; Patient satisfaction; Pulsed electro magnetic field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; DERMATOLOGIST; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FACE ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC AND ELECTROMAGNETIC EQUIPMENT; NASOLABIAL FOLD; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY TREATMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOFREQUENCY; SAFETY; SKIN COLOR; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FACE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC FIELD THERAPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RADIO WAVES; REJUVENATION; SKIN; SKIN AGING;

EID: 84890344354     PISSN: 09546634     EISSN: 14711753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2012.714454     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dover JS, Zelickson B. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments: Assessment of a low-energy multiple-pass technique leading to a clinical end point algorithm. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:900-907
2. Suh DH, Chang KY, Ryou JH, Lee SJ, Kim HS. Monopolar radiofrequency treatment in Asian skin: A questionnaire-based study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011;13:126-129
3. Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, et al. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: A pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:204-209
4. Emilia del Pino M, Rosado RH, Azuela A, et al. Effect of controlled volumetric tissue heating with radiofrequency on cellulite and the subcutaneous tissue of the buttocks and thighs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5:714-722
5. Lin HY, Lu KH. Repairing large bone fractures with low frequency electromagnetic fields. J Orthop Res. 2010;28:265-270
6. Trock DH. Electromagnetic fields and magnets. Investigational treatment for musculoskeletal disorders. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2000; 26:51-62; viii
7. Weintraub MI, Herrmann DN, Smith A, Backonja MM, Cole SP. Pulsed electromagnetic fields to reduce diabetic neuropathic pain and stimulate neuronal repair: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1102-1109
8. Yuan Y, Wei L, Li F, et al. Pulsed magnetic field induces angiogenesis and improves cardiac function of surgically induced infarcted myocardium in Sprague-Dawley rats. Cardiology. 2010;117:57-63
9. Tepper OM, Callaghan MJ, Chang EI, et al. Electromagnetic fields increase in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis through endothelial release of FGF-2. FASEB J. 2004;18:1231-1233
10. Murray JC, Farndale RW. Modulation of collagen production in cultured fibroblasts by a low-frequency, pulsed magnetic field. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985;838:98-105
11. Ahmadian S, Zarchi S R, Bolouri B. Effects of extremely-low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on collagen synthesis in rat skin. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2006;43:71-75
12. Athanasiou A, Karkambounas S, Batistatou A, et al. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on secondary skin wound healing: An experimental study. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28:362-368
13. Jasti AC, Wetzel BJ, Aviles H, Vesper DN, Nindl G, Johnson MT. Effect of a wound healing electromagnetic field on inflammatory cytokine gene expression in rats. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2001;37: 209-214
14. Dindar H, Renda N, Barlas M, et al. The effect of electromagnetic field stimulation on corticosteroids-inhibited intestinal wound healing. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1993;18:49-55
15. Alexiades-Armenakas M. A quantitative and comprehensive grading scale for rhytides, laxity, and photoaging. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5: 808-809
16. Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33:232-242
17. Alexiades-Armenakas M, Dover JS, Arndt KA. Unipolar versus bipolar radiofrequency treatment of rhytides and laxity using a mobile painless delivery method. Lasers Surg Med. 2008;40:446-453
18. Hantash BM, Ubeid AA, Chang H, Kafi R, Renton B. Bipolar fractional radiofrequency treatment induces neoelastogenesis and neocollagenesis. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:1-9
19. Bersani F, Marinelli F, Ognibene A, et al. Intramembrane protein distribution in cell cultures is affected by 50 Hz pulsed magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18:463-469
20. Jacobson-Kram D, Tepper J, Kuo P, et al. Evaluation of potential genotoxicity of pulsed electric and electromagnetic fields used for bone growth stimulation. Mutat Res. 1997;388:45-57
21. Callaghan M J, Chang E I, Seiser N, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate normal and diabetic wound healing by increasing endogenous FGF-2 release. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:130-141
22. Strauch B, Herman C, Dabb R, Ignarro LJ, Pilla AA. Evidence-based use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in clinical plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:135-143
23. Khaled M, Levy C, Fisher DE. Control of melanocyte differentiation by a MITF-PDE4D3 homeostatic circuit. Genes Dev. 2010;24: 2276-2281
24. Sadick NS. Update on non-Ablative light therapy for rejuvenation: A review. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32:120-128
25. Nouveau-Richard S, Yang Z, Mac-Mary S, et al. Skin ageing: A comparison between Chinese and European populations. A pilot study. J Dermatol Sci. 2005;40:187-193
26. Shirakabe Y, Suzuki Y, Lam S M. A new paradigm for the aging Asian face. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27:397-402