Social media monitoring: Responsive governance in the shadow of surveillance?

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 335-342

  Bekkers, Victor ^a   Edwards, Arthur ^a   de Kool, Dennis ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Social media; Social media monitoring; Surveillance; Webcare

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890244272     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bakardjieva M., Feenberg A. Involving the virtual subject. Ethics and Information Technology 2000, 2:233-240.
2. Bannister F. The panoptic state: Privacy, surveillance and the balance of risk. Information Polity 2005, 10:65-78.
3. Beer D., Burrows R. Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations Retrieved from. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html.
4. Bekkers V.J.J.M., Edwards A.R., Moody R., Beunders H. Caught by surprise? Micro-mobilization, new media and the management of strategic surprises. Public Management Review 2011, 13(7):1003-1021.
5. Beniger J. The control revolution 1986, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Bouckaert G., de Peuter B., van Dooren W. Meten en vergelijken van lokale bestuurlijke ontwikkeling: een monitoringsysteem voor het lokaal bestuur in Vlaanderen 2003, Die Keure, Brugge.
7. Carr N. The amorality of Web 2.0, Nicolas Carr's blog Retrieved from. http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/10/the_amorality_o.php.
8. Chadwick A. Web 2.0. New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 2009, 5:9-41.
9. Croll A., Power S. Complete web monitoring 2009, O'Reilly, Sebastopol.
10. de Kool D. Monitoring in beeld: een studie naar de doorwerking van monitors in interbestuurlijke relaties 2007, PhD dissertation, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
11. de Kool D. Rational, political and cultural uses of performance monitors: The case of the Dutch urban policy. Performance information in the public sector: How it is used 2008, 174-191. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. W. van Dooren, S. van de Walle (Eds.).
12. de Koster W. 'Nowhere I could talk like that': Togetherness and identity on online forums 2010, PhD dissertation, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
13. Eggers W.D. Government 2.0: Using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy 2007, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD.
14. Fensel D., Leiter B., Stavrakantonakis I. Social media monitoring. Innsbruck: Semantic Technology Institute Retrieved from. http://oc.sti2.at/sites/default/files/SMM%20Handouts.pdf.
15. Gladwell M. The tipping point 2000, Little, Brown and Company, New York.
16. Habermas, J. (1981/1984). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (transl. The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press).
17. Heath R., Palenchar M. Strategic issues management 2009, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
18. Intelligence Media Twitter Analyse Belastingdienst 2012, Media Intelligence, Leiden.
19. King S.A. Researching internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society: An International Journal 1996, 12:119-127.
20. Linders D. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly 2012, 29:446-454.
21. Lyon D. The world wide web of surveillance: The internet and off-world power-flows. Information, Communication & Society 1998, 1(1):91-105.
22. Lyon D. Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life 2001, Open University Press, Buckingham.
23. O'Reilly T. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications and Strategies 2007, 65:17-37.
24. Online Politiek Monitoring Online Discussie Klimaat. 8 February 2010-11 March 2010 2010, Politiek Online, Den Haag.
25. Pfeffer J. Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations 1992, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
26. Prins C., Broeder D., Griffioen H., Keizer H.G., Keymolen E. iGovernment 2011, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
27. Schwartz B. Paradox of choices: Why more is less 2004, Reed Publishers, New York.
28. Sen E. Social media monitoring für Unternehmen 2011, Social Media Verlag, Cologne.
29. Shirky C. The political power of social media. Foreign Affairs 2011, 90:28-41.
30. Sobkowicz P., Kaschesky M., Bouchard G. Opinion mining in social media: Modeling, simulating, and forecasting political opinions in the web. Government Information Quarterly 2012, 29:470-479.
31. Sørensen E., Torfing J. Theories of democratic network governance 2007, Palgrave MacMillan, Houndsmills, UK.
32. Steimel B., Halemba Chr, Dimitrova T. Social media monitoring: Erst zuhören, dann mitreden in den Mitmachmedien! 2010, MIND, Meerbusch, Germany.
33. Sunstein C.R. Republic.com 2001, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
34. Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations 2004, Doubleday, New York.
35. Sutton J.N. Social media monitoring and the democratic national convention: New tasks and emergent processes. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2009, 6:1-20.
36. van Gunsteren H.R. The quest for control. A critique of the rational-central rule approach in public affairs 1976, John Wiley & Sons, London.
37. van Noort G., Willemsen L.M. Online damage control: The effects of proactive versus reactive webcare interventions in consumer-generated and brand-generated platforms. Journal of Interactive Marketing 2011, 26:131-140.
38. Webster C.W.R. Surveillance as X-ray. Information Polity 2012, 17:251-265.
39. Yin R. Case study research: Design and methods 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.