Challenges to using evidence from systematic reviews to stop ineffective practice: An interview study

Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 160-166

  Shepperd, Sasha ^a   Adams, Richard ^b   Hill, Alison ^c   Garner, Sarah ^d   Dopson, Sue ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UK COCHRANE CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c Solutions for Public Health   (United Kingdom)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Commissioning; Systematic review evidence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

COMMISSIONING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW EVIDENCE;

CONSULTANTS; ENGLAND; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HOSPITALS, PUBLIC; HUMANS; NURSES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84890190217     PISSN: 13558196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1355819613480142     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cooksey D. A review of UK health research funding. London: Stationery Office, 2006.
2. Anonymous. Reorganising research in the UK. Lancet 2006; 368: 2105.
3. Haynes RB. What does it take to put an ugly fact through the heart of a beautiful hypothesis? Evid Based Med 2009; 14: 68-69.
4. Brouwers MC, Stacey D and O'Connor AM. Knowledge translation tools. In: Straus SE, Tetroe J and Graham ID (eds) Knowledge translation in health care: Moving from evidence to practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell BMJ Books, 2009, pp.35-45.
5. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458-1465.
6. Rainbird K. Identifying barriers to evidence uptake. Melbourne: National Institute of Clinical Studies, 2006.
7. Gravel K, Légaré F and Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci 2006; 1: 16.
8. Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73: 526-535.
9. Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, et al. Health policymakers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002; 7: 239-244.
10. Audit Commission. Reducing spending on low clinical value treatments. London: Audit Commission, 2011.
11. Smith J, Curry N, Mays N, et al. Where next for commissioning in the English NHS. London: The Kings Fund and The Nuffield Trust, 2010.
12. House of Commons Health Committe. Commissioning. Fourth report of session 2009-10. Vol. 1, London: House of Commons, 2010.
13. Siebenhofer A, Plank J, Berghold A, et al. Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (2): CD003287.
14. Horvath K, Jeitler K, Berghold A, et al. Long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2007; (2): CD005613.
15. Browning GG, Rovers MM, Williamson I, et al. Grommets (ventilation tubes) for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (10): CD001801.
16. Burton MJ and Glasziou PP. Tonsillectomy or adeno-tonsillectomy versus non-surgical treatment for chronic/recurrent acute tonsillitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (1): CD001802.
17. Laupattarakasem W, Laopaiboon M, Laupattarakasem P, et al. Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (1): CD005118.
18. Garner SE, Eady EA, Popescu C, et al. Minocycline for acne vulgaris: efficacy and safety. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (1): CD002086.
19. Crilly T, Jashapara A and Ferlie E. Knowledge mobilisation: a scoping review of the literature. NIHR SDO, HMSO.
20. Oxman AD and Flottorp S. An overview of strategies to promote implementation of evidence based health care. In: Silagy C and Haines A (eds) Evidence-based practice in primary care, 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books, 2001, pp.101-119.
21. Pope C, Ziebland S and Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. In: Pope C and Mays N (eds) Qualitative research in healthcare, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006, pp.63-81.
22. QSR International. NVivo qualitative data analysis software [program]. Melbourne: QSR International, 2010.
23. Audit Commission. Commission 2005. Early lessons from payment by results. London: Audit Commission, 2005.
24. Wennberg JE, Barnes BA and Zubkoff M. Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16: 811-824.
25. Cohen D and Carter P. How small changes led to big profits for insulin manufacturers. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2010; 341: c7139.
26. Garner SE and Littlejohns P. Disinvestment from low value clinical interventions: NICEly done? British Medical Journal 2011; 343: d4519.
27. Gkeredakis E, Swan J, Powell J, et al. Mind the gap: understanding utilisation of evidence and policy in health care management practice. J Health Org Manage 2011; 25: 298-314.
28. Baker R, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; Issue 3: CD005470.
29. Dopson S, Mant J and Hicks N. Getting research into practice: facing the issues. J Manage Med 1994; 8: 4-12.