Firm size, technological capability, exports and economic performance: The case of electronics industry in Malaysia

Journal of Business Economics and Management

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 741-757

  Chandran, V G R ^a   Rasiah, Rajah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Economic performance; Exports; Malaysia; Size; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890136767     PISSN: 16111699     EISSN: 20294433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2012.668860     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abibullah, H. S.; Morshidi, S.; Kamarulazizi, I. 1994. Pemindahan teknologi dalam industri elektronik di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
2. Andersen, T. J.; Foss, N. J. 2005. Strategic opportunity and economic performance in mutlinational enterprises: the role and effects of information and communication technology, Journal of International Management 11(2): 293-310. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. intman. 2005. 03. 008.
3. Andrews, K. 1971. The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
4. Ariffin, N.; Bell, M. 1999. Firms, politics and political economy: patterns of subsidiary-parent linkages and technological capability-building in electronics TNC subsidiaries in Malaysia, in K. S. Jomo, G. Felker, R. Rasiah (Eds.). Industrial Technology Development in Malaysia: Industry and Firm Studies. London: Routledge, 150-190.
5. Ariffin, N.; Figueiredo, P. N. 2004. Internationalization of innovative capabilities: counter-evidence from the electronics industry in Malaysia and Brazil, Oxford Development Studies 32(4): 559-583.
6. Audretsch, D. B.; Acs, Z. J. 1991. Innovation and size at the firm level, Southern Economic Journal 57(3): 739-744. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/1059787.
7. Avella, L.; Fernández, E.; Vázquez, C. J. 2001. Analysis of manufacturing strategy as an explanatory factor of competitiveness in the large Spanish industrial firm, International Journal of Production Economics 72(2): 139-157. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/1059787.
8. Barney, J. B.; Ouchi, W. 1986. Organizational economics: towards a new paradigm for studying and understanding organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
9. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1177/014920639101700108.
10. Barney, J. B.; Wright, M.; Ketchen, D. J. 2001. The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991, Journal of Management 27(6): 625-641. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1177/014920630102700601.
11. Buckley, P. J.; Casson, M. 1991. The future of the multinational enterprise, 2nd ed. Hampshire: Macmillan.
12. Cardozo, R.; McLaughlin, K.; Harmon, B.; Reynolds, P.; Miller, B. 1993. Product-market choices and growth of new businesses, Journal of Product Innovation Management 10(4): 310-340. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/0737-6782(93)90075-2.
13. Chandler, A. 1962. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
14. Chandy, R. K.; Tellis, G. J. 1998. Organizing for radical product innovation: the overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize, Journal of Marketing Research 35: 474-487. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/3152166.
15. Cohen, W. M.; Klepper, S. 1996. A reprise of size and R&D, The Economic Journal 106(437): 925-951. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/2235365.
16. Conner, K. R.; Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A resource-based theory of firm: knowledge versus opportunism, Organization Science 7(5): 477-501. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1287/orsc. 7. 5. 477.
17. Dahlman, C. J.; Ross-Larson, B.; Westphal, L. E. 1987. Managing technological development: lessons from the newly industrializing countries, World Development 15: 759-775. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/0305-750X(87)90058-1.
18. Delios, A.; Beamish, P. W. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification and the corporate performance of Japanese firms, Strategic Management Journal 20(8): 711-727. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199908)20: 8<711:: AID-SMJ41>3. 0. CO; 2-8.
19. Dhanaraj, C.; Beamish, P. W. 2003. A resource-based approach to the study of export performance, Journal of Small Business Management 41(3): 242-261. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1111/1540-627X. 00080.
20. Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy 11(3): 147-162. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6.
21. Duysters, G.; Hagedoorn, J. 2000. Core competencies and company performance in the worldwide computer industry, Journal of High Technology Management Research 11(1): 75-91. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S1047-8310(00)00022-5.
22. Ernst, D.; Ganiatsos, T.; Mytelka, L. (Eds.). 1998. Technological capabilities and export success in Asia. London: Routledge.
23. Figueiredo, P. N. 2002a. Does technological learning pay off? Inter-firm differences in technological capability-accumulation paths and operational performance improvement, Research Policy 31(1): 73-94. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S0048-7333(01)00106-8.
24. Figueiredo, P. N. 2002b. Learning processes features and technological capability-accumulation: Explaining inter-firm differences, Technovation 22: 685-698. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S0166-4972(01)00068-2.
25. Fornell, C. R.; Bookstein, F. L. 1982. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory, Journal of Marketing Research 19(4): 440-452. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/3151718.
26. Geroski, P.; Machin, S.; Reenen, J. 1993. The profitability of innovating firms, RAND Journal of Economics 24(2): 198-211. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/2555757.
27. Graves, S. B.; Langowitz, N. S. 1993. Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry, Strategic Management Journal 14: 593-605. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/smj. 4250140803.
28. Griliches, Z. 1986. Productivity, R&D and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s, American Economic Review 76(1): 141-154.
29. Grossman, G. M.; Helpman, E. 1991. Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
30. Guan, J.; Ma, N. 2003. Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms, Technovation 23: 737-747. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5.
31. Henderson, R. M.; Cockburn, I. M. 1994. Measuring competence: exploring firm-effects in pharmaceutical research, Strategic Management Journal 15: 63-84. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/smj. 4250150906.
32. Hirschman, A. O. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33. Hitt, M. A.; Ireland, R. D.; Lee, H. 2000. Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: an introductory essay, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14(3/4): 231-246. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S0923-4748(00)00024-2.
34. Hobday, M. 1996. Innovation in South-East Asial: lessons for Europe, Management Science 34(9): 71-81.
35. Hobday, M. 1999. Understanding innovation in electronics in Malaysia, in K. S. Jomo, F. Greg, R. Rasiah (Eds.). Industrial technology development in Malaysia: industry and firms studies. London: Routledge.
36. Hobday, M. 2005. Firm-level innovation models: perspectives on research in developed and developing countries, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17(2): 121-146. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/09537320500088666.
37. Hobday, M.; Rush, H. 2007. Upgrading the technological capabilities of foreign transnational subsidiaries in developing countries: the case of electronics in Thailand, Research Policy 36: 1335-1356. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. respol. 2007. 05. 004.
38. Hulland, J. 1999. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies, Strategic Management Journal 20: 195-204. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20: 2<195:: AID-SMJ13>3. 0. CO; 2-7.
39. Iammarino, S.; Padilla-Perez, R.; von Tunzelmann, N. 2008. Technological capabilities and global-local interactions: the electronics industry in two Mexican regions, World Development 36(10): 1980-2003. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. worlddev. 2007. 10. 022.
40. Ito, K.; Pucik, V. 1993. R&D spending, domestic competition, and export performance of Japanese manufacturing firms, Strategic Management Journal 14(1): 61-75. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/smj. 4250140107.
41. Karagozoglu, N.; Lindell, M. 1998. Internationalization of small and medium-sized technologybased firms: an exploratory study, Journal of Small Business Management 36(1): 44-59.
42. Kim, L.; Nelson, R. (Eds.). 2001. Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Krugman, P. 1979. A model of innovation, technology transfer and the world distribution of income, Journal of Political Economy 87(2): 253-266. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1086/260755.
44. Krugman, P. 1986. Industrial organization and international trade, NBER Working Papers 1957. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
45. Kumar, N.; Siddharthan, N. S. 1994. Technology, firm size and export behaviour in developing countries: the case of Indian enterprises, Journal of Development Studies 31(2): 289-309. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/00220389408422362.
46. Lai, Y. W.; Narayanan, S. 1999. Technology utilization level and choice: the electronics and electrical sector in Penang, in K. S. Jomo, G. Felker, R. Rasiah (Eds.). Industrial technology development in Malaysia: industry and firm studies. London: Routledge, 107-124.
47. Lall, S. 1992. Technological capabilities and industrialization, World Development 20(2): 165-186.
48. Lall, S. 1998. Technological capabilities in emerging Asia, Oxford Development Studies 26(2): 213-243.
49. Lall, S. 2001. Competitiveness, technology and skills. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
50. Link, A. N. 1981. Research and development activity in US manufacturing. New York: Proger.
51. Lucas, R. J. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics 22(1): 3-42. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7.
52. McDougall, P. P.; Oviatt, B. M. 1996. New venture internationalization: strategic change and performance: a follow-up study, Journal of Business Venturing 11(1): 23-40. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/0883-9026(95)00081-X.
53. Mittelstaedt, J. D.; Harben, G. N.; Ward, W. A. 2003. How small is too small? Firm size as a barrier to exporting from the United States, Journal of Small Business Management 41(1): 68-84. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1111/1540-627X. 00067.
54. Narayanan, S.; Lai, Y. W. 2000. Technological maturity and development without research: the challenge for Malaysian manufacturing, Development and Change 31: 435-457. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1111/1467-7660. 00161.
55. Nelson, R. 1973. Recent exercises in growth accounting: new understanding or dead end?, The American Economic Review 63(3): 462-468.
56. Nelson, R. 1981. Research on productivity growth and productivity differences: dead end and new departures, Journal of Economic Literature 19: 1029-1064.
57. Nelson, R. 1991. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?, Strategic Management Journal 12: 61-74. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/smj. 4250121006.
58. Nelson, R. 2008. Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory, Oxford Development Studies 36(1): 9-21. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/13600810701848037.
59. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B.; Lal, K. 2006. Institutional support for collective learning: cluster development in Kenya and Ghana, African Development Review 18(2): 258-278. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1467-8268. 2006. 00142. x.
60. Pavitt, K. 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy 13(6): 343-373. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0.
61. Pavitt, K.; Robson, M.; Townsend, J. 1987. The size distribution of innovating in the UK 1945-1983, Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 291-316. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/2098636.
62. Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley.
63. Pla-Barber, J.; Alegre, J. 2007. Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry, International Business Review 16: 275-293. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ibusrev. 2007. 02. 005.
64. Rasiah, R. 2010. Are electronics firms in Malaysia catching up in the technology ladder?, Journal of Asia Pacific Economy 15(3): 301-319. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/13547860. 2010. 494910.
65. Rasiah, R. 1994. Flexible production systems and local machine tool subcontracting: electronics components transnational in Malaysia, Cambridge Journal of Economics 18(3): 279-298.
66. Rasiah, R. 2004. Technological intensities in East and Southeast Asian electronics firms: does network strength matter?, Oxford Development Studies 32(3): 433-455. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/1360081042000260610.
67. Rasiah, R. 2006. Ownership, technological intensities, and economic performance in South Africa, International Journal of Technology Management 36(1/2/3): 166-189.
68. Rasiah, R. 2007. Export-orientation and technological intensities in auto parts firms in East and Southeast Asia: does ownership matter?, Asian Economic Papers 6(2): 55-76. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1162/asep. 2007. 6. 2. 55.
69. Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy 94(5): 1002-1037. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1086/261420.
70. Romer, P. M. 1990. Endogenous technological change, The Journal of Political Economy 98(5): S71-S102. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1086/261725.
71. Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
72. Rosenberg, N.; Firschtak, C. (Eds.). 1985. International technology transfer; concepts, measure and comparisons. New York: Harper.
73. Scherer, F. M. 1984. Innovation and growth: schumpeterian perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
75. Shapira, P.; Youtie, J.; Yogeesvaran, K.; Jaafar, Z. 2006. Knowledge economy measurements: methods, results and insights from the Malaysian knowledge content study, Research Policy 35(10): 1522-1537. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. respol. 2006. 09. 015.
76. Smith, A. 1776. The wealth of the nations. London: Strahan and Cadell.
77. Solow, R. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function, Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312-320. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/1926047.
78. Solow, R. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1): 65-94.
79. Sterlacchini, A. 1999. Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance, Research Policy 28: 819-832. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S0048-7333(99)00023-2.
80. Stock, G. N.; Greis, N. P.; Fischer, W. A. 2001. Absorptive capacity and new product development, Journal of High Technology Management Research 12(1): 77-91. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S1047-8310(00)00040-7.
81. Strandskov, J. 2006. Sources of competitive advantages and business performance, Journal of Business Economics and Management 7(3): 119-129.
82. Teece, D. J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal 18: 509-533. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18: 7<509:: AID-SMJ882>3. 0. CO; 2-Z.
83. Tsai, K.-H. 2004. The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan's electronics industry, Journal of High Technology Management Research 15: 183-195. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. hitech. 2004. 03. 002.
84. Vickery, S. K.; Jayaram, J.; Droge, C.; Calantone, R. 2003. The effect of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationship, Journal of Operations Management 21(5): 523-539. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. jom. 2003. 02. 002.
85. Wakelin, K. 2001. Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms, Research Policy 30: 1079-1090. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S0048-7333(00)00136-0.
86. Wignaraja, G. 2002. Firm size, technological capabilities and market-oriented policies in Mauritius, Oxford Development Studies 30(1): 87-104.
87. Wignaraja, G. 2008a. Ownership, technology and buyers: explaining exporting in China and Sri Lanka, Transnational Corporations 17(2): 1-15.
88. Wignaraja, G. 2008b. Foreign ownership, technological capabilities and clothing exports in Sri Lanka, Journal of Asian Economics 19: 29-39. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. asieco. 2007. 12. 001.
89. Wold, H. 1982. Systems under indirect observation using PLS, in C. Fornell (Ed.). A second generation of multivariate analysis. New York: Praeger.
90. Yeoh, P. L.; Roth, K. 1999. An empirical analysis of sustained advantage in the US pharmaceutical industry: impact of firm resources and capabilities, Strategic Management Journal 20: 637-653. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20: 7<637:: AID-SMJ42>3. 0. CO; 2-Z.
91. Young, A. 1928. Increasing returns and economic progress, Economic Journal 38(152): 527-542. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/2224097.
92. Zhao, H.; Li, H. 1997. R&D and exports: an empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturing firms, The Journal of High Technology Management Research 8(1): 89-105. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S1047-8310(97)90015-8.