Payments for environmental services (PES) in the public policy landscape: "Mandatory" spices in the Indonesian recipe

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 18, Issue , 2012, Pages 23-29

  Pirard, Romain ^a  

^a SCIENCES PO   (France)

Author keywords

Forestry; Indonesia; Payments for ecosystem services; PES; Public policy; Watershed

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS; FUNDING SOURCES; ILLEGAL PRACTICES; INDONESIA; MARKET-BASED MECHANISMS; PAYMENTS FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PES; POLICY FRAMEWORK; POLLUTER-PAYS PRINCIPLE; PRIVATE STAKEHOLDERS; RURAL POPULATION; SERVICE PROVIDER; TRANSACTION COST; UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES;

AUTOMOBILE BODIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORESTRY; WATERSHEDS;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 84858161302     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bayon R., Jenkins M. The business of biodiversity. Nature 2010, 466:184-185. (8 July).
2. Camacho A., Reyes V. Pago por servicios ambiéntales. Octavo informe sobre el estado de La Nacion en desarrollo humano sostenible 2002, Consejo Nacional de Rectores, San José, Costa Rica.
3. Coase R. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 1960, 3(1):1-44.
4. Colchester M., Boscolo M., Contreras-Hermosilla A., Del Gatto P., Dempsey J., Lescuyer G., Obidzinski K., Pommier D., Richards M., Sembiring S., Tacconi L., Vargas Rios M.T., Wells A. Justice in the forest 2006, Rural livelihoods and forest law enforcement, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, 98 pp.
5. Condorcet N. Réflexions sur l'esclavage des nègres, Chap VII 1781, 41.
6. Demsetz H. Towards a theory of property rights. The American Economic Review 1967, 57:347-359.
7. Grieg-Gran M., Porras I., Wunder S. How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development 2005, 33(9):1511-1527.
8. Hahn R. Economic prescriptions for environmental problems: how the patient followed the doctor's orders. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1989, 3(2):95-114.
9. Hahn R.W. The impacts of economics on environmental policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2000, 39:375-399.
10. Hendrayana H. Penyusunan Rancangan Rehabilitasi Ekosistem Sumber Mata Air Tertentu di Pulau Lombok, Dinas Kehutanan Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat, Mataram, Indonesia 2003.
11. Karsenty A. Questioning rent for development swaps: new market-based instruments for biodiversity acquisition and the land-use issue in tropical countries. International Forestry Review 2007, 9(1):503-513.
12. Karsenty A., Lescuyer G., Pirard R., Lemaître S., Demenois J., Karpe P. Rapport scientifique du projet de recherche: Régimes internationaux et transformations des politiques publiques affectant les forêts tropicales. Convention n° 04 2 484 2008, CIRAD, France.
13. Meral P. Les services environnementaux en économie : revue de la littérature, Programme SERENA, Document de travail n° 2010-05 2010, 50 pp.
14. Munoz-Pina C., Guevara A., Torres J.-M., Brana J. Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:725-736.
15. Nelson F., Foley C., Foley L.S., Leposo A., Loure E., Peterson D., Peterson M., Peterson T., Sachedina H., Williams A. Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in Northern Tanzania. Conservation Biology 2009, 24(1):78-85.
16. Pagiola S. Guidelines for 'pro-poor' Payments for Environmental Services 2007, World Bank, Washington DC.
17. Pagiola S., Arcenas A., Platais G. Can Payments for Environmental Services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development 2005, 33(2):237-253.
18. Peguin D., Tahla L. Pourquoi le régime rentier est-il si rétif au changement? Une interprétation des facteurs de blocages en termes d'institutions. Actes du Forum de la Régulation 2001 2001.
19. Pender J., Suyanto Kerr J., Kato E. Impacts of the Hutan Kemasyarakatan Social Forestry Program in the Sumberdaya watershed, West Lampung District of Sumatra, Indonesia. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00769 2008, IFPRI, Washington DC.
20. Pirard R. Yasuni ITT: an innovative environmental mechanism faces reality. Opinion letter. Consiliense 2011, Columbia University.
21. Pirard R., Billé R., Sembrés T. Upscaling Payments for Environmental Services (PES): critical issues. Tropical Conservation Science 2010, 3(3):249-261.
22. Redford K.H., Adams W.M. Payment for Ecosystem Services and the challenge of saving nature. Conservation Biology 2009, 23(4):785-787.
23. Sheil D., Meijaard E. Purity and prejudice: deluding ourselves about biodiversity conservation. Biotropica 2010, 42(5):566-568.
24. Smith R.J., Muir R.D.J., Walpole M.J., Balmford A., Leader-Williams N. Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature 2003, 426:67-70.
25. Sommerville M., Milner-Gulland E.J., Rahajaharison M., Jones J.P.G. Impact of a community-based Payment for Environmental Services intervention on forest use in Menabe, Madagascar. Conservation Biology 2010, 24:1488-1498.
26. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 2009, 69:1245-1252.
27. World Bank, 1991. The Economics of Sustainable Forest Management: a Malaysian Case Study. Unpublished, 29 pp.
28. Wunder S. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42 2005, Center for International Forestry research, Bogor, Indonesia.
29. WWF Indonesia Nusa Tenggara Program Resource Economic Valuation of Rinjani Mountain Area 2002, WWF Indonesia Nusa Tenggara Program, Mataram, Indonesia.