Optical coherence tomography criteria for defining functional severity of intermediate lesions: A comparative study with FFR

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1685-1691

  Pawlowski, Tomasz ^a   Prati, Francesco ^b   Kulawik, Tomasz ^a   Ficarra, Eleonora ^b   Bil, Jacek ^a   Gil, Robert ^a,c  

^a CENTRAL CLINICAL HOSPITAL OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERIOR   (Poland)

^b MOLINETTE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c MOSSAKOWSKI MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Poland)

Author keywords

FFR; Intermediate lesion; OCT

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MINIMAL LUMEN AREA; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDED DRUG DOSE; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOSINE; AGED; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; HYPEREMIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84890122075     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0283-x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. De Bruyne B, Sarma J (2008) Fractional flow reserve: a review. Heart 94:948-959
2. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD et al (2001) ACC Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for the acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Committee to Develop a Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies [IVUS]). J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1478-1492
3. Prati F, Cera M, Ramazzotti V, Imola F, Giudice R, Albertucci M (2007) Safety and feasibility of a new non-occlusive technique for facilitated intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) acquisition in various clinical and anatomical scenarios. EuroIntervention 3:365-370
4. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213-224
5. De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Bartunek J et al (2001) Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 14:157-162
6. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Bech GJ et al (2000) Coronary pressure measurement to assess the hemodynamic significance of serial stenoses within one coronary artery: validation in humans. Circulation 102:2371-2377
7. Gil R, Pawlowski T, Dudek D et al (2007) Comparison of angiographically guided direct stenting technique with direct stenting and optimal balloon angioplasty guided with intravascular ultrasound. The multicenter, randomized trial results Am Heart J 154:669-675
8. Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F et al (2001) Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 87:136-141
9. De la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez FH, Alfonso F et al (2011) Prospective application of predefined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions: Results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:351-358
10. Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, Kazuhito S, Kawara M, Kasanuki H (1999) Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis. Relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 100:250-255
11. Kang S, Lee J, Ahn J et al (2011) Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:65-71
12. Dor I, Turguson R, Gaglia M et al (2011) Correlation between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound area in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. EuroIntervention 7:225-233
13. Koo B, Yang H, Doh J et al (2011) Optimal intravascular ultrasound criteria and their accuracy for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses of different locations. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 4:803-811
14. Prati F, Regar E, Mintz G et al (2010) Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis. Euro Heart J 31:401-415
15. Gonzalo N, Escaned J, Alfonso F et al (2012) Morphometric assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with optical coherence tomography. A comparison with fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1080-1089
16. Shiono Y, Kitabata H, Kubo T et al (2012) Optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical criteria for functionally significant coronary stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve. Circ J. (advance publication; released: June 21)
17. Costa M, Sabate M, Staico R et al (2007) Anatomical and physiologic assessments in patients with small coronary artery disease: final results of the physiologic and anatomical evaluation prior to and after stent implantation in small coronary vessels (PHANTOM) trial. Am Heart J 153:296e1-296e7
18. Lee CH, Tai BC, Soon CY et al (2010) New set of intravascular ultrasound-derived anatomic criteria for defining functionally significant stenoses in small coronary arteries (results from Intravascular Ultrasound Diagnostic Evaluation of Atherosclerosis in Singapore [IDEAS] study). Am J Cardiol 105:1378-1384
19. Reith S, Battermann S, Jaskolka A, Lehmacher W, Hoffmann R, Marx N, Burgmaier M (2013) Relationship between optical coherence tomography derived intraluminal and intramural criteria and haemodynamic relevance as determined by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenoses of patients with type 2 diabetes. Heart 99(10):700-707. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303616
20. Moussa I, Kobayashi Y, Adamian M et al (2001) Characteristics of patients with a large discrepancy in coronary artery diameter between quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 88:294-296
21. Gonzalo N, Serruys P, García-García H et al (2009) Quantitative ex vivo and in vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries. Rev Esp Cardiol 62(6):615-624
22. Kolozsvári R, Tar B, Lugosi P, Sánta J, Béres Z, Ungvári T, Polgár P, Koszegi Z (2012) Plaque volume derived from three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography predicts the fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol 160(2):140-144
23. Guagliumi G, Sirbu V, Petroff C, Capodanno D, Musumeci G, Yamamoto H, Elbasiony A, Brushett C, Matiashvili A, Lortkipanidze N, Valsecchi O, Bezerra HG, Schmitt JM (2013) Volumetric assessment of lesion severity with optical coherence tomography: relationship with fractional flow. EuroIntervention 8(10):1172-1181
24. Stefano G, Bezerra H, Attizzani G et al (2011) Utilization of frequency domain optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve to assess intermediate coronary artery stenoses: conciliating anatomic and physiologic information. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2:299-308
25. Prati F, Di Vito L, Biondi-Zoccai G et al (2012) Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study. EuroIntervention 8:823-829
26. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J 31:2501-2555
27. Jeremias A, Whitbourn RJ, Filardo SD et al (2000) Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J 140:651-657