Regarding "Identifying women at risk of unintended pregnancy: A comparison of two pregnancy readiness measures": Measuring pregnancy intention

Annals of Epidemiology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 78-79

  Barrett, Geraldine ^a,b   Morroni, Chelsea ^b   Stephenson, Judith ^b   Hall, Jennifer ^b   Morof, Diane ^c   Rocca, Corinne H ^d  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERNAL VALIDITY; LETTER; PLANNING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY INTENTION; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY;

CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84890116167     PISSN: 10472797     EISSN: 18732585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.09.007     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. Brunner Huber L.R., Lyerly J.E., Farley K.E., Alkhazraji T. Identifying women at risk of unintended pregnancy: a comparison of two pregnancy readiness measures. Ann Epidemiol 2013, 23(7):441-443.
2. Barrett G., Smith S.C., Wellings K. Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. JEpidemiol Community Health 2004, 58(5):426-433.
3. Rocca C.H., Krishnan S., Barrett G., Wilson M. Measuring pregnancy planning: an assessment of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among urban, south Indian women. Demogr Res 2010, 23:293-334.
4. Morof D., Steinauer J., Haider S., Liu S., Darney P., Barrett G. Evaluation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in a United States population of women. PLoS One 2012, 7(4):e35381.
5. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing 1999, American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association and National Council for Measurement in PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association and National Council for Measurement in Psychology, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
6. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research 2002, 11(3):193-205. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust.
7. Streiner D.L., Norman G.R. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide totheir Development and Use 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 4th ed.
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. 2009. (Accessed 08.06.2013). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
9. Gaydos L.M.D., Kramer M.R., Rowland Hogue C.J. Development of a measure of preconception pregnancy readiness. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development 2010, 3(4):379-387.