Free breathing three-dimensional gradient echo-sequence with radial data sampling (radial 3D-GRE) examination of the pancreas: Comparison with standard 3D-GRE volumetric interpolated breathhold examination (VIBE)

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1572-1577

  Bamrungchart, Saraporn ^a,b   Tantaway, Engy M ^a   Midia, Esin C ^a   Hernandes, Mateus A ^a   Srirattanapong, Saowanee ^a,c   Dale, Brian M ^d   Semelka, Richard C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LERDSIN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Thailand)

^c MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^d SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

abdominal MRI; free breathing; noncooperative patients; pancreatic imaging; radial acquisition; three dimensional gradient echo sequence

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREE BREATHING THREE DIMENSIONAL GRADIENT ECHO SEQUENCE WITH RADIAL DATA SAMPLING; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; VOLUMETRIC INTERPOLATED BREATHHOLD EXAMINATION;

ABDOMINAL MRI; FREE BREATHING; NONCOOPERATIVE PATIENTS; PANCREATIC IMAGING; RADIAL ACQUISITION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRADIENT ECHO-SEQUENCE;

ALGORITHMS; BREATH HOLDING; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC DISEASES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84890098912     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24064     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Birchard KR, Semelka RC, Hyslop WB, et al. Suspected pancreatic cancer: evaluation by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 700-703.
2. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999; 212: 876-884.
3. Rasche V, de Boer RW, Holz D, Proksa R,. Continuous radial data acquisition for dynamic MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 754-761.
4. Song HK, Dougherty L,. Dynamic MRI with projection reconstruction and KWIC processing for simultaneous high spatial and temporal resolution. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 815-824.
5. Katoh M, Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Manning WJ, Gunther RW, Botnar RM,. MR coronary vessel wall imaging: comparison between radial and spiral k-space sampling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 757-762.
6. Altun E, Semelka RC, Dale BM, Elias J Jr,. Water excitation MPRAGE: an alternative sequence for postcontrast imaging of the abdomen in noncooperative patients at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 1146-1154.
7. Dale B, Wendt M, Duerk JL,. A rapid look-up table method for reconstructing MR images from arbitrary K-space trajectories. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 207-217.
8. Block KT, Uecker M, Frahm J,. Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 1086-1098.
9. Morelli JN, Runge VM, Ai F, et al. An image-based approach to understanding the physics of MR artifacts. Radiographics 2011; 31: 849-866.
10. Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics 2001; 21: 23-37.
11. Altun E, Elias J Jr, Armao D, Vachiranubhap B, Semelka RC,. Pancreas. In:, Semelka RC, editor. Abdominal-pelvic MRI, 3rd edition. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2010. 141 p.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG,. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174
13. Vasanawala SS, Iwadate Y, Church DG, et al. Navigated abdominal T1-W MRI permits free-breathing image acquisition with less motion artifact. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: 340-344.
14. Glover GH, Noll DC,. Consistent projection reconstruction (CPR) techniques for MRI. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29: 345-351.
15. Xue Y, Yu J, Kang HS, Englander S, Rosen MA, Song HK,. Automatic coil selection for streak artifact reduction in radial MRI. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: 470-476
16. Chandarana H, Block TK, Rosenkrantz AB, et al. Free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo sequence: a viable alternative for contrast-enhanced liver imaging in patients unable to suspend respiration. Invest Radiol 2011; 46: 648-653
17. Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, Yamamoto H, Urata J, Takahashi M,. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1297-1303.
18. Shin SS, Armao DM, Shah M, et al. Management of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: observation with MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 28: 1440-1446.
19. Balci NC, Semelka RC,. Radiologic features of cystic, endocrine and other pancreatic neoplasms. Eur J Radiol 2001; 38: 113-119.
20. Martin DR, Semelka RC,. MR imaging of pancreatic masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2000; 8: 787-812.