Optimal inspection and design of onshore pipelines under external corrosion process

Structural Safety

Volumn 47, Issue , 2014, Pages 48-58

  Gomes, Wellison J S ^a   Beck, André T ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Corrosion; Inspection; Maintenance; Pipeline safety management; Risk; Structural optimization

Indexed keywords

CORROSION GROWTH MODELS; EXTERNAL CORROSION; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM; LATIN-HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMAL INSPECTION; PIPELINE SAFETY; PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COSTS; DESIGN; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; INSPECTION; MAINTENANCE; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PIPELINES; REPAIR; RISKS; SAFETY ENGINEERING; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

CORROSION;

EID: 84890095309     PISSN: 01674730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Melchers RE Modeling of marine immersion corrosion for mild and low-alloy steels-part 1: Phenomenological Model. Corrosion (NACE) 2003, 59. No. 4.
2. Melchers RE Pitting Corrosion of Mild Steel in Marine Immersion Environment-Part 1: Maximum Pit Depth. Corrosion (NACE) 2004, 60. No. 9.
3. Caleyo F, Velázquez JC, Valor A, Hallen JM Probability distribution of pitting corrosion depth and rate in underground pipelines: a Monte Carlo study. Corros Sci 2009, 51:1925-1934.
4. Velázquez JC, Caleyo F, Valor A, Hallen JM Predictive model for pitting corrosion in buried oil and gas pipelines. Corrosion 2009, 65:332-342.
5. Velázquez JC, Caleyo F, Valor A, Hallen JM Pitting corrosion of underground pipelines related to local soil and pipe characteristics. Corros Sci 2010, 66:16001-16005. 10.5006/1.3318290.
6. Faber MH, Kroon IB, Sorensen JD Sensitivities in structural maintenance planning. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1996, 51:317-329.
7. Onoufriou T, Frangopol DM Reliability-based inspection optimization of complex structures: a brief retrospective. Comput Struct 2002, 80:1133-1144.
8. Rackwitz R, Lentz A, Faber M Socio-economically sustainable civil engineering infrastructures by optimization. Struct Saf 2005, 27:187-229.
9. Straub D, Faber MH Risk based inspection planning for structural systems. Struct Saf 2005, 27:335-355.
10. Bucher C, Frangopol DM Optimization of lifetime maintenance strategies for deteriorating structures considering probabilities of violating safety, condition, and cost thresholds original. Probabilist Eng Mech 2006, 21:1-8.
11. Streicher H, Joanni A, Rackwitz R Cost-benefit optimization and risk acceptability for existing, aging but maintained structures. Struct Saf 2008, 30:375-393.
12. Nader M.Okasha, Dan M.Frangopol Lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization of structural maintenance considering system reliability, redundancy and life-cycle cost using GA. Struct Saf 2009, 31:460-474.
13. Sanchez-Silva M, Klutke GA, Rosowsky DV Life-cycle performance of structures subject to multiple deterioration mechanisms. Struct Saf 2011, 33:206-217.
14. Tao Z, Corotis RB, Ellis JH Reliability-based bridge design and life cycle management with Markov decision processes. Struct Saf 1994, 16:111-132.
15. Orcesi AD, Frangopol DM, Kim S Optimization of bridge maintenance strategies based on multiple limit states and monitoring. Eng Struct 2010, 32:627-640.
16. Orcesi AD, Frangopol DM Optimization of bridge maintenance strategies based on structural health monitoring information. Struct Saf 2011, 33:26-41.
17. Biondini F, Frangopol DM Lifetime reliability-based optimization of reinforced concrete cross-sections under corrosion. Struct Saf 2009, 31:483-489.
18. Bastidas-Arteaga E, Schoefs F Stochastic improvement of inspection and maintenance of corroding reinforced concrete structures placed in unsaturated environments. Eng Struct 2012, 41:50-62.
19. Estes AC, Frangopol DM Minimum expected cost-oriented optimal maintenance planning for deteriorating structures: application to concrete bridge decks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2001, 73:281-291.
20. Chassiakos AP, Vagiotas P, Theodorakopoulos DD A knowledge-based system for maintenance planning of highway concrete bridges. Adv Eng Soft 2005, 36:740-749.
21. Cremona C Reliability updating of welded joints damaged by fatigue. Int J Fatigue 1996, 18:567-575.
22. Kulkarni SS, Achenbach JD Optimization of inspection schedule for a surface-breaking crack subject to fatigue loading. Probabilist Eng Mech 2007, 22:301-312.
23. Valdebenito MA, Schuëller GI Design of maintenance schedules for fatigue-prone metallic components using reliability-based optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2010, 199:2305-2318.
24. Riahi H, Bressolette Ph, Chateauneuf A, Bouraoui Ch, Fathallah R Reliability analysis and inspection updating by stochastic response surface of fatigue cracks in mixed mode. Eng Struct 2011, 33:3392-3401.
25. Hong HP Inspection and maintenance planning of pipeline under external corrosion considering generation of new defects. Struct Saf 1999, 21:203-222.
26. Zhou W, Nessim MA Optimal design of onshore natural gas pipelines. J Press Vess Technol 2011, 133.
27. Gomes WJS, Beck AT, Haukaas T Optimal inspection planning for onshore pipelines subject to external corrosion. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013, 118:18-27.
28. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 1999: ASME B31.8: Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems.
29. Canadian Standard Association (CSA), 2007: CSA Z662-07: Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems.
30. Beck AT, Verzenhassi CC Risk optimization of a steel frame communications tower subject to tornado winds. Latin Am J Solids Struct 2008, 5:187-203.
31. Beck AT, Gomes WJS A comparison of deterministic, reliability-based and risk-based structural optimization under uncertainty. Probabilist Eng Mech 2012, 28:18-29.
32. Beck AT, Gomes WJS, Bazán FAV On the robustness of structural risk optimization with respect to epistemic uncertainties. Int J Uncertain Quantification 2012, 2:1-20.
33. Gomes WJS, Beck AT Global structural optimization considering expected consequences of failure and using ANN surrogates. Comput Struct 2013, 126:56-68. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.10.013.
34. Zhou W System reliability of corroding pipelines. Int J Press Vess Piping 2010, 87:587-595.
35. Bazán FAV, Beck AT Stochastic process corrosion growth models for pipeline reliability. Corros Sci 2013, 74:50-58.
36. Paik JK, Kim DK Advanced method for the development of an empirical model to predict time-dependent corrosion wastage. Corros Sci 2012, 63:51-58.
37. Gomes WJS, Beck AT, Silva CRA Modeling Random Corrosion Processes via Polynomial Chaos Expansion. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2013, 34 NSpe:561-568.
38. Beck AT, Gomes WJS Stochastic fracture mechanics using polynomial chaos. Probabilist Eng Mech 2013, 34:26-39. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2013.04.002.
39. Cameron RH, Martin WT The orthogonal development of nonlinear functionals in series of Fourier-Hermite functionals. Ann Math 1947, 48:385-392.
40. Xiu D, Karniadakis GE The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 2002, 24:619-644.
41. Wiener N The homogeneous chaos. Am J Math 1938, 60:897-936.
42. Ogura H Orthogonal functionals of the Poisson process. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 1972, 18:473-481.
43. Askey R, Wilson J Some basic hypergeometric polynomials that generalize Jacobi polynomials. Mem Amer Math Soc 1985, 319. AMS, Providence, RI.
44. Ghanem RG, Spanos PD stochastic finite elements - a spectral approach 1991, Springer Verlag.
45. Sudret B, Der Kiureghian A Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: a state-of-the-art report, report no. UCB/SEMM-2000/08 2000, University of California, Berkeley.
46. Leis BN, Stephens DR An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe - part II: alternative criterion 1997, 635-640.
47. Cosham Ae, Hopkins P The pipeline defect assessment manual (PDAM), the PDAM joint industry project 2003, PENSPEN Group, Newcastle, UK.
48. Olsson A, Sandberg G, Dahlblom O On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis. Struct Safety 2003, 25:47-68. 10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00039-5.
49. Taflanidis AA, Beck JL An efficient framework for optimal robust stochastic system design using stochastic simulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008, 198:88-101. 10.1016/j.cma.2008.03.029.
50. Au SK Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation. Comput Struct 2005, 83:1048-1061.
51. Lagarias JC, Reeds J, Wright MH, Wright PE Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J Optimiz 1998, 9:112-147. 10.1137/S1052623496303470.
52. Nelder JA, Mead R A simplex method for functional minimization. Comput J 1965, 4:308-313.
53. Spendley W, Hext G, Himsworth F Sequential application of simplex designs in optimisation and evolutionary operation. Technometrics 1962, 4:441-461.