BIM: Enabling sustainability and asset management through knowledge management

The Scientific World Journal

Volumn 2013, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Kivits, Robbert Anton ^a   Furneaux, Craig ^b  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING INDUSTRY; BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING; CASE STUDY; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA BASE; ENGINEERING; GOVERNMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; WORK;

EID: 84890014674     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1537744X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2013/983721     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Riskus J., Which Architecture Firms Are Using BIM? Why? AIA, 2007
2. Waterhouse R., National BIM Report 2013 2013 London, UK RIBA Enterprises Ltd.
3. Hartman T., Fischer M., Applications of BIM and Hurdles for Widespread Adoption of BIM-2007 AISC-ACCL eConstruction Roundtable Event Report. CIFE Working Paper 2008 WP105 Stanford, Calif, USA Stanford University
4. Goldberg H. E., State of the AEC industry: BIM implementation slow, but inevitable. Cadalyst 2005 22 5 44 45 2-s2.0-20144371606
5. Ashcraft H. W., Building information modeling: electronic collaboration in conflict with traditional project delivery. Construction Litigation Reporter 2006 27 7-8
6. Stake R. E., Denzin N., Lincoln Y. S., Case studies. Strategies of Qualitative Enquiry 2003 Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA Sage 134 164
7. Miles M., Huberman M., Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 1984 Beverly Hills, Calif, USA Sage
8. Patton M. Q., Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods 2002 3rd Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA Sage
9. CRC for Construction Innovation, Adopting BIM for Facilities Management: Solutions for managing the Sydney Operah House. 2007, http://www.construction- innovation.info/
10. Fallon K. K., Palmer M. E., General Buildings Information Handover Guide: Principles, Methodology and Case Studies. 2007, http://www.wbdg.org/pdfs/ nistir-7417.pdf
11. US GSA, GSA Building information modeling guise series 01-overview. The National 3D-4D-BIM Program, Office of the Chief Architect, Washington, DC, USA, 2007
12. USACE, ERDC TR-06-10, The US Army Corps of Engineers Roadmap for Life-Cycle BIM. US ACE, Washington, DC, USA, 2006
13. Ballesty S., Facilities Management Action Agenda: The Australian Government and Industry Working Together for Improvement. Cooperative Research Center (CRC) for Construction Innovation, 2006
14. Brodt W., East E. W., BuildingSMART with COBIE: the construction operations building information exchange. 2006
15. Matta C., Kam C., The GSA's BIM Pilot Program. The AIA TAP Knowledge Community First Annual BIM Awards Competition, 2005, http://www.aia.org/ SiteObjects/files/gsa.pdf
16. BRAC, Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission Report. U.S. Air Force Fact Sheet, 2005
17. Burgess J., Furneaux C. W., Streamlining Local Government: Evaluating an eGovernment Initiative in South East Queensland. Report 5-CIBE Research Project. P. K. Brown. Brisbane, Australia, 2007
18. Christopher M., Opening other windows: a political economy of "openness" in a global information society. Review of International Studies 2008 34, supplement 1 69 92
19. Larke G. R. G., Has the internet increased exports for firms from low and middle-income countries? Information Economics and Policy 2008 20 1 16 37
20. Brodlie K., Fairbairn D., Kemp Z., Schroeder M., Dykes J., MacEachren A. M., Kraak M.-J., Connecting people, data and resources-distributed geovisualization. Exploring Geovisualisation 2005 London, UK Elsevier 425 443
21. Harris L., Cornelius N., Jackson P., Harris L., Eckersley P. M., Organizational considerations for e-Business. E-Business Fundamentals 2003 New York, NY, USA Routledge 67 100
22. OECD, OECD e-Government Studies: The e-Government Imperative 2003 Paris, France OECD Publishing
23. AIA, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect with Standard Form of Architect's Services. Document 1997 B141 Washington, DC, USA American Institute of Architects
24. AGC, the AGC Contractors' Guide to BIM. 2006, http://store.agc.org/ePubs/ ePubs/2928EB
25. CURT, Collaboration, Integrated Information and the Project Life Cycle in Building Design, Construction and Operation. (WP-1202). Construction Users Roundtable (CURT), August 2004
26. Gallaher M., O'Conner A. C., Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. NIST 2004 GCR 04-867 National Institute of Standards and Technology
27. Froese T. M., Yu K. Q., Industry foundation class modeling for estimating and scheduling. Durability of Building Materials and Components 1999 8 4 2825 2835
28. Bazjanac V., Early lessons from deployment of IFC compatible software. USA, 2002
29. Turk Z., Dolenc M., Nabrzyski J., Towards engineering on the grid. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Product and Process Modelling in the Building and Construction Industry (ECPPM '04) September 2004 Istanbul, Turkey A.A. Balkema: Taylor & Francis Group
30. Batcheler B., Howell I., The Purpose Driven Exchange of Project Information. Design Build DATELINE, 2005
31. Bazjanac V., Virtual building environments (VBE)-applying information modeling to buildings. USA, 2004
32. Moore G. A., Crossing the Chasm, Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customer 1999 New York, NY, USA Harper Collins Publishers
33. Kiviniemi A., Tarandi V., Karlshøj J., Bell H., Karud O. J., Review of the Development and Implementation of IFC compatible BIM, Erabuild. 2008
34. Emmit S., Gorse C., Construction Communication 2003 Blackwell
35. Gibson G. E., Davis-Blake A., Changes to North American project delivery systems. Proceedings of the Cutting Edge and ROOTS Conferences 2001 COBRA
36. Taylor J. E., Levitt R., Innovation alignment and project network dynamics: an integrative model for change. Project Management Journal 2007 38 3 22 35
37. Salazar G., Mokbel H., The building information model in the civil and environmental engineering education at WPI. Proceedings of the ASEE New England Section Annual Conference 2006 New England, UK
38. Dakan M., GSA's BIM Pilot Program shows success. AEC Tech News 2006 2
39. Davison R. M., Wagner C., Ma L. C. K., From government to E-government. Information Technology & People 2005 18 3 280 299
40. Finch E., Third-wave Internet in facilities management. Facilities 2000 18 5-6 204 212
41. Domikis R., Douglas J., Bisson L., Impacts of data format variability on environmental visual analysis systems. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Applied Climatology January 2007
42. OECD, OECD Input to the UN working group on internet governance. 2005
43. Tse T.-C. K., Wong K.-D. A., Wong K.-W. F., The utilisation of Building Information Models in nD modelling: a study of data interfacing and adoption barriers. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction 2005 10 85 110 2-s2.0-21344434751
44. Ibrahim M., Krawczyk R., Schipporeit G., Two approaches to BIM: a comparative study. The Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, 2004
45. Dempsey J. J., Facility Asset Management Doctrine; A Strategy for Making Better Decisions at Lower Risk and Costs. 2006
46. Cyon, The Building Information Model: A Look at Graphisoft's Virtual Building Concept. Bethesda, Md, USA, A Cyon Research White Paper, 2003
47. CRC for Construction Innovation, Fact Sheet 2-Building Information modelling. Sydney opera House Facilities Management Project, 2005, http://www.construction-innovation.info/
48. Fischer M., Keynote Address: visualisation and information-4D CAD and Collaboration. Clients Driving Innovation. Surfers Paradise, 2004
49. Williams M., Technological and process innovation at PB-the effective application of VDC clients driving innovation: benefiting from innovation. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the CRC for Construction Innovation 2008 Gold Coast, Australia CRC for Construction Innovation
50. Elliman D., Pridmore T., Comparing active shape models with active appearance models. 1 10th British Machine Vison Conference 1999 173 182
51. NOIE, Government Online: Online Survey. 2001, http://unpan1.un.org/ intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN003824.pdf
52. FMA,. Facility Management Association of Australia, 1998
53. Akhurst P., Gillespie N., Sydney Opera House; Facilities Management Exemplar Project. Cooperative Research Center (CRC) for Construction Innovation, 2006
54. Kajewski S., Tilley P., Crawford J., Improving ICT Integration in Today's AEC Industry. CRC CI website Report 2001 2001-008-C-09
55. Williams A., Dobson P., Changing Culture: New Organisational Approaches 1993 London, UK Institute of Personal Management (IPM)
56. Pulaski M. H., Field Guide for Sustainable Construction. Pentagon Renovation and Construction Program Office Safety Sustainability and Environment IPT and Washington Headquarters Services Defense Facilities Directorate, USA, 2004
57. Kagioglou M., Lee A., Cooper R., Carmichael S., Aouad G., Mapping the production process: a case study. Proceedings IGLC-10 2002 Gramado, Brazil
58. Karhu V., Lahdenpera P., A formalised process model of current Finnish design and construction practise. International Journal of Construction Information Technology 7 1 51 71
59. Sandivo V. E., Khayyal S., Guvenis M., Norton K., Hetrick M., Al Muallem M., Chung E., Medeiros D., Kumara S., Ham I., An integrated building process model. 1990 1 The Pennsylvania State University. Computer integrated construction research program
60. van Merendonk P. H., van Dissel D. J., Beulens A. J. M., Bouw informatie model: versie 3.1. IOP-Bouw, 1989